fishman princples of discrete event simulation pdf
时间: 2023-10-29 18:02:55 浏览: 45
《离散事件仿真的Fishman原则》是一本关于离散事件仿真的重要参考书籍,作者是Fishman,该书提供了关于离散事件仿真的基本原则和方法。
这本书的主要内容包括:离散事件仿真的概念、离散事件仿真模型的建立、事件驱动的离散事件仿真模型、随机数的生成方法以及仿真实验的设计与分析等方面。
Fishman在书中提出了许多关于离散事件仿真的原则,这些原则可以帮助读者更好地理解和应用离散事件仿真。其中一些原则如下:
1. 离散事件仿真模型应该基于事件的离散性而非连续性。
2. 在建立仿真模型时,应该明确模型中的所有事件和状态转换。
3. 仿真模型应该能够准确地捕捉系统中发生的事件,并能够正确地模拟它们的交互和影响。
4. 在设计仿真实验时,要考虑到模型中的各种随机因素,并对这些随机因素进行恰当的设置和控制。
5. 在进行仿真实验时,要注意模型的验证与验证,以保证模型的准确性和可靠性。
6. 在对仿真结果进行分析时,要注重实验结果的可解释性,以便从中获取有意义的结论。
《离散事件仿真的Fishman原则》是一本系统而全面的离散事件仿真参考书籍,对于对离散事件仿真感兴趣的人士来说是一本必读之作。无论是从理论还是实践的角度,这本书都能为读者提供宝贵的指导和帮助。
相关问题
ctfshow的web15 fishman
根据引用,ctfshow的web15 fishman是一道CTF比赛中的题目。根据引用的源代码,题目要求找到关键的源代码,并扫描目录。代码中包含了一个函数`receiveStreamFile`,用于接收文件流并将其保存到指定的文件中。代码还检查了一个条件,即`md5(date("i")) === $token`,如果满足条件,则将接收的文件进行一系列的判断和比较,最后返回一个JSON格式的结果。根据引用,这道题目可能与之前的SSRF题目相关。至于具体的解题方法和答案,还需要进一步研究和分析。
Huang, L., Cheng, Y., & Ma, Y. (2016). Project-based learning in teaching basic science: A qualitative study on primary school teachers' perceptions and practices. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(1), 40-53. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J. R., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project based learning: A proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction. ASCD. Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., ... & Clay-Chambers, J. (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1063-1080. Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation.用英文APA格式简写一下
Huang, L., Cheng, Y., & Ma, Y. (2016). Project-based learning in teaching basic science: A qualitative study on primary school teachers' perceptions and practices. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(1), 40-53.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J. R., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project based learning: A proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction. ASCD.
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., ... & Clay-Chambers, J. (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1063-1080.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation.