SELECT ems.vin AS vincode, count(*) AS `count` FROM autost_auction.epms_order ems WHERE ems.created_time >= DATE_SUB(NOW(), INTERVAL 90 DAY) and ems.created_time <= NOW() GROUP BY ems.vin;优化这条SQL,使created_time字段的索引生效
时间: 2024-04-15 20:27:59 浏览: 11
为了使 `created_time` 字段的索引生效,可以进行以下优化步骤:
1. 索引创建:首先,确保 `created_time` 字段已经创建了索引。如果没有创建索引,可以使用以下语句创建一个索引:
```
CREATE INDEX idx_created_time ON autost_auction.epms_order (created_time);
```
2. 查询优化:优化查询语句以利用索引。以下是优化后的查询语句:
```sql
SELECT
ems.vin AS vincode,
COUNT(*) AS `count`
FROM
autost_auction.epms_order ems
WHERE
ems.created_time >= DATE_SUB(NOW(), INTERVAL 90 DAY) AND ems.created_time <= NOW()
GROUP BY
ems.vin;
```
注意,在 `WHERE` 子句中,将 `ems.created_time` 与常量进行比较,以使索引得到利用。同时,确保在 `GROUP BY` 子句中只包含需要分组的列。
以上是优化 SQL 查询的常见步骤。但请注意,优化效果可能因数据库的特定配置和数据量而有所不同。在进行任何更改之前,请确保在测试环境中进行彻底测试。
相关问题
帮我优化下这个sql : SELECT t4.vin, t3.msg_id AS trip_id, t3.trip_start_time, t4.switch_value AS has_trip FROM ( SELECT * FROM dds.dwd_driving_calendar t1 WHERE t1.vin = 'LSJA24396MS179029' AND 1681745400001 > t1.trip_start_time AND 1681745400001 < t1.trip_end_time ) t3 LEFT JOIN ( SELECT * FROM dds.vehicle_journey_switch_history t2 WHERE t2.vin IN ( 'LSJA24396MS179029' ) ) t4 ON t3.vin = t4.vin AND t4.switch_key = 'vehicle_journey_data' AND '2023-04-17 23:30:00' > t4.create_time AND '2023-04-17 23:30:00' < t4.update_time
可以尝试优化以下几个方面:
1. 使用EXISTS替换LEFT JOIN
可以使用EXISTS来代替LEFT JOIN进行连接查询,因为EXISTS在查询到一条匹配的数据后就会停止,而LEFT JOIN需要查询完整个表再返回结果。
```
SELECT t3.vin, t3.msg_id AS trip_id, t3.trip_start_time,
t4.switch_value AS has_trip
FROM dds.dwd_driving_calendar t3
WHERE t3.vin = 'LSJA24396MS179029'
AND 1681745400001 > t3.trip_start_time
AND 1681745400001 < t3.trip_end_time
AND EXISTS (
SELECT 1
FROM dds.vehicle_journey_switch_history t4
WHERE t3.vin = t4.vin
AND t4.switch_key = 'vehicle_journey_data'
AND '2023-04-17 23:30:00' > t4.create_time
AND '2023-04-17 23:30:00' < t4.update_time
)
```
2. 添加索引
在vin、trip_start_time、trip_end_time、switch_key、create_time和update_time列上添加索引,可以加速查询。
3. 不要使用SELECT *
在子查询中不要使用SELECT *,而是明确指定需要查询的列,可以减少不必要的数据读取和传输,提高查询效率。例如:
```
SELECT vin, msg_id AS trip_id, trip_start_time
FROM dds.dwd_driving_calendar
WHERE vin = 'LSJA24396MS179029'
AND 1681745400001 > trip_start_time
AND 1681745400001 < trip_end_time
```
```
SELECT vin, switch_value
FROM dds.vehicle_journey_switch_history
WHERE vin IN ('LSJA24396MS179029')
AND switch_key = 'vehicle_journey_data'
AND '2023-04-17 23:30:00' > create_time
AND '2023-04-17 23:30:00' < update_time
```
WITH temp AS ( SELECT * FROM doris_fdbfault_QBMonitor_OA WHERE vin IN ( SELECT DISTINCT vin FROM vin_packID_pairing_v2 WHERE SUBSTR(packID, 6, 3) = 'VB6' ) ), result_detail AS ( SELECT day, vin, Flag_RositivetoGroundISOR, Counts_RositivetoGroundISOR, ST_RositivetoGroundISOR, ET_RositivetoGroundISOR, Flag_NegativetoGroundISOR, Counts_NegativetoGroundISOR, ST_NegativetoGroundISOR, ET_NegativetoGroundISOR FROM temp t1 WHERE day >= '2023-07-01' AND vin NOT IN ( SELECT DISTINCT vin FROM temp t2 WHERE t2.day < t1.day ) ) SELECT COUNT(*) FROM result_detail WHERE day = '2023-07-01'; 帮忙修改这段代码
根据你提供的代码,我注意到其中一个问题是在子查询中使用了相同的表别名 `t1`,这会导致语法错误。此外,你还可以进行一些代码优化来提高查询性能。
以下是修改后的代码:
```sql
WITH temp AS (
SELECT *
FROM doris_fdbfault_QBMonitor_OA
WHERE vin IN (
SELECT DISTINCT vin
FROM vin_packID_pairing_v2
WHERE SUBSTR(packID, 6, 3) = 'VB6'
)
),
result_detail AS (
SELECT t1.day, t1.vin, t1.Flag_RositivetoGroundISOR, t1.Counts_RositivetoGroundISOR, t1.ST_RositivetoGroundISOR, t1.ET_RositivetoGroundISOR,
t1.Flag_NegativetoGroundISOR, t1.Counts_NegativetoGroundISOR, t1.ST_NegativetoGroundISOR, t1.ET_NegativetoGroundISOR
FROM temp t1
LEFT JOIN temp t2 ON t2.vin = t1.vin AND t2.day < t1.day
WHERE t1.day >= '2023-07-01' AND t2.vin IS NULL
)
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM result_detail
WHERE day = '2023-07-01';
```
在修改后的代码中,我将第一个子查询中的表别名 `t1` 修改为了 `t2`,以便与外部查询的别名区分开来。另外,我还将子查询中的 `NOT IN` 子句改为了使用左连接 `LEFT JOIN` 和 `IS NULL` 的方式来过滤出不满足条件的行,这样可以提高查询性能。
请注意,这只是根据你提供的代码进行的修改,如果还有其他问题,请提供更多详细信息,我将尽力帮助你。