MicroPython Documentation, Release 1.12
precious memory. Note that there still cases where buffering may be useful, so we may introduce optional buffering
support at a later time.
But in CPython, another important dichotomy is tied with “bufferedness” - it’s whether a stream may incur short
read/writes or not. A short read is when a user asks e.g. 10 bytes from a stream, but gets less, similarly for writes. In
CPython, unbuffered streams are automatically short operation susceptible, while buffered are guarantee against them.
The no short read/writes is an important trait, as it allows to develop more concise and efficient programs - something
which is highly desirable for MicroPython. So, while MicroPython doesn’t support buffered streams, it still provides
for no-short-operations streams. Whether there will be short operations or not depends on each particular class’ needs,
but developers are strongly advised to favor no-short-operations behavior for the reasons stated above. For example,
MicroPython sockets are guaranteed to avoid short read/writes. Actually, at this time, there is no example of a short-
operations stream class in the core, and one would be a port-specific class, where such a need is governed by hardware
peculiarities.
The no-short-operations behavior gets tricky in case of non-blocking streams, blocking vs non-blocking behavior
being another CPython dichotomy, fully supported by MicroPython. Non-blocking streams never wait for data either
to arrive or be written - they read/write whatever possible, or signal lack of data (or ability to write data). Clearly,
this conflicts with “no-short-operations” policy, and indeed, a case of non-blocking buffered (and this no-short-ops)
streams is convoluted in CPython - in some places, such combination is prohibited, in some it’s undefined or just not
documented, in some cases it raises verbose exceptions. The matter is much simpler in MicroPython: non-blocking
stream are important for efficient asynchronous operations, so this property prevails on the “no-short-ops” one. So,
while blocking streams will avoid short reads/writes whenever possible (the only case to get a short read is if end of
file is reached, or in case of error (but errors don’t return short data, but raise exceptions)), non-blocking streams may
produce short data to avoid blocking the operation.
The final dichotomy is binary vs text streams. MicroPython of course supports these, but while in CPython text
streams are inherently buffered, they aren’t in MicroPython. (Indeed, that’s one of the cases for which we may
introduce buffering support.)
Note that for efficiency, MicroPython doesn’t provide abstract base classes corresponding to the hierarchy above, and
it’s not possible to implement, or subclass, a stream class in pure Python.
Functions
uio.open(name, mode=’r’, **kwargs)
Open a file. Builtin open() function is aliased to this function. All ports (which provide access to file system)
are required to support mode parameter, but support for other arguments vary by port.
Classes
class uio.FileIO(...)
This is type of a file open in binary mode, e.g. using open(name,"rb"). You should not instantiate this
class directly.
class uio.TextIOWrapper(...)
This is type of a file open in text mode, e.g. using open(name,"rt"). You should not instantiate this class
directly.
class uio.StringIO([string ])
class uio.BytesIO([string ])
In-memory file-like objects for input/output. StringIO is used for text-mode I/O (similar to a normal file
opened with “t” modifier). BytesIO is used for binary-mode I/O (similar to a normal file opened with “b”
modifier). Initial contents of file-like objects can be specified with string parameter (should be normal string
for StringIO or bytes object for BytesIO). All the usual file methods like read(), write(), seek(),
flush(), close() are available on these objects, and additionally, a following method:
1.1. Python standard libraries and micro-libraries 15