Java单元测试实践：用JUnit优化测试

5星 · 超过95%的资源需积分: 10 105 浏览量更新于2024-07-23 收藏 1.2MB PDF 举报

"本书《Pragmatic Unit Testing in Java with JUnit》主要关注Java语言的实用单元测试，通过JUnit框架进行实践。读者评论表明，这本书深入浅出地介绍了单元测试的概念和重要性，并通过实例和类比帮助读者理解其实际应用价值。适合不同层次的开发者，无论是测试新手还是有经验的开发者，都能从中获益。" 详细内容: 《Pragmatic Unit Testing in Java with JUnit》是一本专注于Java开发中单元测试实践的书籍，特别强调了使用JUnit测试框架的方法。单元测试是软件开发过程中的重要环节，它允许开发者对代码的各个独立部分进行验证，确保它们按预期工作，从而提高软件质量，减少错误和维护成本。书中的内容可能包括以下几个方面： 1. **单元测试基础**：首先，书籍会解释单元测试的基本概念，如什么是单元测试，为何需要进行单元测试。作者通过生动的实例和轶事，让读者理解单元测试在软件开发中的重要性和实际意义。 2. **JUnit框架介绍**：书中详细介绍了JUnit框架的使用，包括如何创建测试用例、断言、测试套件以及使用注解等。这将帮助读者快速上手使用JUnit进行单元测试。 3. **最佳实践**：书中可能会涵盖单元测试的最佳实践，比如测试驱动开发(TDD)和行为驱动开发(BDD)，以及如何编写可读性强、易于维护的测试代码。 4. **测试策略**：书中可能讨论了如何设计和组织测试，如如何选择合适的测试数据，何时使用模拟对象（Mock Objects）来隔离被测试代码，以及如何处理依赖和并发问题。 5. **问题解决与调试**：当遇到测试失败或困难时，书中的内容可能包含了解决这些问题的策略和技巧，帮助读者有效地调试和修复测试。 6. **高级主题**：除了基础知识，书籍也面向有一定经验的开发者，提供了一些高级话题，如持续集成（Continuous Integration）、测试覆盖率分析以及测试的自动化。 7. **团队协作与文化**：书中可能还涉及如何在团队中推广单元测试，建立测试文化，以及如何将单元测试作为团队开发流程的一部分。 8. **案例研究**：书中可能包含真实的项目案例，通过这些案例，读者可以更直观地看到单元测试在实际项目中的应用和价值。《Pragmatic Unit Testing in Java with JUnit》是一本旨在帮助开发者提高单元测试技能的实用指南，无论你是刚开始接触单元测试，还是已经有一定经验，都能从中找到有价值的信息和启示。通过学习本书，你可以提升自己的测试能力，从而写出更稳定、更可靠的Java应用程序。

WHY SHOULD I BOTHER WITH UNIT TESTING? 4

work as expected, we can then proceed to assemble and test

working systems.

After all, if we aren’t sure the code is doing what we think,

then any other forms of testing may just be a waste of time.

You still need other forms of testing, and perhaps much more

formal testing depending on your environment. But testing,

as with charity, begins at home.

1.3 Why Should I Bother with Unit Testing?

Unit testing will make your life easier. It will make your de-

signs better and drastically reduce the amount of time you

spend debugging.

In our tale above, Pat got into trouble by assuming that lower-

level code worked, and then went on to use that in higher-level

code, which was in turn used by more code, and so on. With-

out legitimate conﬁdence in any of the code, Pat was building

a “house of cards” of assumptions—one little nudge at the

bottom and the whole thing falls down.

When basic, low-level code isn’t reliable, the requisite ﬁxes

don’t stay at the low level. You ﬁx the low level problem, but

that impacts code at higher levels, which then need ﬁxing,

and so on. Fixes begin to ripple throughout the code, getting

larger and more complicated as they go. The house of cards

falls down, taking the project with it.

Pat keeps saying things like “that’s impossible” or “I don’t un-

derstand how that could happen.” If you ﬁnd yourself think-

ing these sorts of thoughts, then that’s usually a good indica-

tion that you don’t have enough conﬁdence in your code—you

don’t know for sure what’s working and what’s not.

In order to gain the kind of code conﬁdence that Dale has,

you’ll need to ask the code itself what it is doing, and check

that the result is what you expect it to be.

That simple idea describes the heart of unit testing: the single

most effective technique to better coding.

Prepared exclusively for Francilene Procopio Garcia

WHAT DO I WANT TO ACCOMPLISH? 6

Can I Depend On It?

Code that you can’t depend on is useless. Worse, code that

you think you can depend on (but turns out to have bugs) can

cost you a lot of time to track down and debug. There are

very few projects that can afford to waste time, so you want to

avoid that “one step forward two steps back” approach at all

costs, and stick to moving forward.

No one writes perfect code, and that’s okay—as long you know

where the problems exist. Many of the most spectacular soft-

ware failures that strand broken spacecraft on distant planets

or blow them up in mid-ﬂight could have been avoided sim-

ply by knowing the limitations of the software. For instance,

the Arianne 5 rocket software re-used a library from an older

rocket that simply couldn’t handle the larger numbers of the

higher-ﬂying new rocket.

It exploded 40 minutes into ﬂight,

taking $500 million dollars with it into oblivion.

We want to be able to depend on the code we write, and know

for certain both its strengths and its limitations.

For example, suppose you’ve written a routine to reverse a

list of numbers. As part of testing, you give it an empty list—

and the code blows up. The requirements don’t say you have

to accept an empty list, so maybe you simply document that

fact in the comment block for the method and throw an ex-

ception if the routine is called with an empty list. Now you

know the limitations of code right away, instead of ﬁnding out

the hard way (often somewhere inconvenient, such as in the

upper atmosphere).

Does it Document my Intent?

One nice side-effect of unit testing is that it helps you commu-

nicate the code’s intended use. In effect, a unit test behaves as

executable documentation, showing how you expect the code

to behave under the various conditions you’ve considered.

For aviation geeks: The numeric overﬂow was due to a much larger “hor-

izontal bias” due to a different trajectory that increased the horizontal velocity

of the rocket.

Prepared exclusively for Francilene Procopio Garcia

剩余162页未读，继续阅读

yzlworld

粉丝: 22
资源: 8

Java单元测试实践：用JUnit优化测试

Pragmatic Unit Testing in Java with JUnit源码

Pragmatic Unit Testing In Java With Junit

pragmatic unit testing in java with junit

pragmatic programmers:pragmatic unit testing in java with junit

Pragmatic Unit Testing in Java 8 with JUnit epub

Pragmatic Unit Testing in Java 8 with JUnit 无水印pdf

Pragmatic Unit Testing in Java 8 with JUnit(PACKT,2015）

Pragmatic Unit Testing-Java

《Pragmatic Unit Testing实战指南》：Java 8 JUnit实用教程

junit 电子书，Pragmatic Unit Testing

最新资源