Haskell高级类型编程指南：从新手到编译器驱动

需积分: 10 63 浏览量更新于2024-07-17 收藏 4.71MB PDF 举报

"《思考类型：2018》是一本专注于Haskell语言中类型编程的全面指南。作者Sandy Maguire旨在帮助读者从一个熟练的Haskell程序员提升到能够说服编译器执行更多工作的专家。本书的核心内容涵盖了类型编程的基础理论，如类型背后的代数原理，如同构性和基数，以及类型构造如联合、产品和指数类型的应用。通过实例如Tic-Tac-Toe游戏展示了如何将业务逻辑转化为类型检查，强调了类型错误的潜在好处。第1章深入剖析了类型系统的基础，包括类型、箭头种类和约束种类的概念。数据种类（Data Kinds）的介绍让读者理解如何在类型层次上处理内置类型的推广，例如符号、自然数、列表和元组。类型级别的函数也被详细讨论，展示了如何在类型层面上进行操作。章节2探讨了 variance，即类型变量在不同上下文中的行为，这对于理解函数签名和类型参数的重要性至关重要。书中的这一部分有助于读者理解如何处理类型作用域和类型应用的规则，以及如何处理可能的类型歧义和非唯一性问题。第3章进一步探讨了如何与类型互动，特别是在处理类型限制和解构方面。类型作用域的控制以及类型应用的操作方法被详细阐述，这对于编写高效且可维护的代码至关重要。章节4聚焦于类型约束和GADTs（Generalized Algebraic Data Types），这是类型系统中的关键特性。GADTs允许在类型定义中包含条件，这对于实现更为复杂的数据结构和验证机制非常有用。通过介绍GADTs的概念及其在实际项目中的应用，作者展示了如何利用这些工具提高代码的灵活性和表达力。《思考类型：2018》为Haskell开发者提供了一个强大的工具箱，通过学习和实践书中的内容，读者不仅能掌握类型编程的技巧，还能学会如何利用类型系统来消除错误，优化代码，并实现更高级的抽象。这本书不仅适合有基础的Haskell程序员，也对希望深入理解类型理论和实践的读者极具价值。"

2 CONTENTS

or any such thing. Rather, this desire comes from a place of

benevolence—a little frustration with the type-checker now is

preferable to a hard-to-ﬁnd bug making its way into production.

Type-level programming, like anything, is best in moderation. It

comes with its own costs in terms of complexity, and as such should

be wielded with care. While it’s pretty crucial that your ﬁnancial

application handling billions of dollars a day runs smoothly, it’s a

little less critical if your hobbyist video game draws a single frame of

gameplay incorrectly. In the ﬁrst case, it’s probably worthwhile to

use whatever tools you have in order to prevent things from going

wrong. In the second, these techniques are likely too heavy-handed.

Style is a notoriously dicult thing to teach—in a very real sense,

style seems to be what’s left after we’ve extracted from a subject all of

the things we know how to teach. Unfortunately, when to use type-

level programming is largely a matter of style. It’s easy to take the

ball and run with it, but discretion is divine.

When in doubt, err on the side of not doing it at the type-level.

Save these techniques for the cases where it’d be catastrophic to get

things wrong, for the cases where a little type-level stu goes a long

way, and for the cases where it will drastically improve the API. If

your use-case isn’t obviously one of these, it’s a good bet that there

is a cleaner and easier means of doing it with values.

But let’s talk more about types themselves.

As a group, I think it’s fair to say that Haskellers are contrarians.

Most of us, I’d suspect, have spent at least one evening trying to extol

the virtues of a strong type system to a dynamically typed colleague.

They’ll say things along the lines of “I like Ruby because the types

don’t get in my way.” Though our ﬁrst instinct, as proponents of

strongly typed systems, might be to forcibly connect our head to the

table, I think this is a criticism worth keeping in mind.

As Haskellers, we certainly have strong opinions about the value

of types. They are useful, and they do carry their weight in gold

when coding, debugging and refactoring. While we can dismiss our

colleague’s complaints with a wave of the hand and the justiﬁcation

that they’ve never seen a “real” type system before, we are doing

them and ourselves a disservice both. Such a ﬂippant response is to

ignore the spirit of their unhappiness—types often do get in the way.

We’ve just learned to blind ourselves to these shortcomings, rather

than to bite the bullet and entertain that maybe types aren’t always

剩余248页未读，继续阅读

Lullaxm

粉丝: 0
资源: 1

Haskell高级类型编程指南：从新手到编译器驱动

Thinking with Types

Data Structure and Algorithmic Thinking with Python 无水印pdf 0分

Web.Client.Programming.with.Perl.Automating.Tasks.on.the.Web.pdf

Mind Tools_Practical Thinking Skills for an Excellent Life_2007.pdf

Java.9.Data.Structures.and.Algorithms.2017.4.pdf

cisco_ios_access_lists.pdf

1903_Mesh-Models-Overview_FINAL.pdf

Get Programming with HASKELL

Google C++ Style Guide(Google C++编程规范）高清PDF

白色卡通风格响应式游戏应用商店企业网站模板.zip

最新资源