C4ISR架构与社交网络分析：FINC方法实验

5星 · 超过95%的资源需积分: 9 37 浏览量更新于2024-08-01 收藏 672KB PDF 举报

"这篇论文探讨了C4ISR（Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance）架构，社会网络分析以及FINC（Force, Intelligence, Networking and C2）方法论在军事组织结构实验中的应用。通过构建一个基于‘SCUD猎杀’场景的简单测试平台，研究者能够探索不同条件下的组织架构。FINC方法论用于计算每个C4ISR架构的三个关键指标，从而验证该方法论的有效性，并提炼出C4ISR架构的四个基本原理。" C4ISR架构是军事指挥与控制的核心组成部分，它整合了通信、计算机、情报、监视和侦察等多方面的能力，旨在提高战场决策效率和行动协调性。在“SCUD猎杀”场景中，C4ISR系统可能涉及到对移动导弹发射器的定位、跟踪和打击，这需要高效的指挥链、信息共享和快速响应。社会网络分析（SNA）在这里被用作理解C4ISR架构中不同单元间关系和信息流动的工具。SNA可以帮助识别关键节点、信息瓶颈以及网络的脆弱性，这对于优化组织结构和增强协同作战能力至关重要。通过SNA，可以评估不同组织架构在面对复杂作战任务时的适应性和效率。 FINC方法论是一种评估C4ISR架构性能的方法，它包括三个主要的度量指标： 1. **Force（力量）**：衡量作战单位的可用性和战斗力。 2. **Intelligence（情报）**：评估信息收集、处理和分发的效率。 3. **Networking（网络）**：关注信息传输的可靠性和速度。 4. **C2（指挥与控制）**：考察决策制定和命令执行的效能。将FINC方法论应用于测试平台，不仅验证了该方法的实用性，还揭示了C4ISR架构的四个基本原则，这些原则可能包括但不限于： 1. **集成性**：C4ISR系统需要高度集成，确保所有组件能够无缝协作。 2. **灵活性**：系统应能适应不断变化的战场环境和任务需求。 3. **实时性**：情报更新和命令传递必须迅速准确。 4. **冗余与容错性**：设计中应考虑备份和故障恢复机制，以降低单点故障的风险。通过这样的实验，军事组织能够更好地理解和优化其C4ISR架构，提升整体作战效能。这篇论文的工作对于未来军事战略规划和系统设计具有重要的参考价值。

DSTO-GD-0313

1. Introduction

In this paper we discuss the application of Social Network Analysis concepts [1, 2] to

C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence,

Surveillance & Reconnaissance) architectures. In particular, we describe the FINC

methodology [3], which calculates a number of metrics for evaluating C4ISR

architectures.

We also present a simple experimental testbed for evaluating some C4ISR

architectures, and some experimental results which validate the FINC methodology.

We believe that, in order to gain understanding of organisational design, it is

important to use simple and easily understood testbeds that permit rapid

experimentation, in much the same way that early experiments with rapidly-

breeding fruit flies [4] led to modern successes in genetic engineering. We share this

belief with the Carnegie Mellon group, which has published extensive studies using

a simple testbed focused on bureaucratic organisations [5, 6]. The use of agent-based

distillations for studying military operations [17], and Conway's famous “Game of

Life” are based on similar philosophies of experimentation.

For our purposes, we require a testbed more closely aligned with military activities,

and which models an organisation not only as an information-processing structure,

but which also includes the interactions between the organisation and its

environment. The organisation receives information (intelligence) from its

environment, makes decisions, and produces some effect on the environment. In this

way, it resembles a model of a biological organism, and like an organism, the

performance of a military organisation depends on the appropriateness of its

response to its environment. The testbed we use is based on the SCUDHunt [7]

game, which was originally designed for experiments on the coordination of virtual

(distributed) teams using different communication tools. This testbed is precisely

suited to our purpose since it is simple, yet has an interesting range of behaviour,

allowing us to explore the impact of different organisational architectures under a

range of different conditions.

This paper is divided into three main parts: the first discusses our experimental

testbed and the results of experimentation, the second describes the FINC

methodology, and the third applies the FINC methodology to our experimental

results, allowing us to derive four basic principles of C4ISR architectures, which are

outlined in table 7 at the end of the paper.

1.1 C4ISR Architectures

The term C4ISR architecture [8] is used by the US and other militaries to refer to the

organisational structure used by military forces in carrying out a mission. The key

aspect of C4ISR is command (authority and responsibility) and control (exercising

authority over subordinates). These two indivisible aspects of leadership are

referred to as C2. Since communications and computer technology are important in

carrying out these leadership functions in a large organisation, the acronyms C3 and

C4 are used to include these facilities.

DSTO-GD-0313

Since leadership cannot be carried out without information of some kind, the

acronyms C3I and C4I are used to include intelligence, which means the collection of

relevant information. The acronym C4ISR includes two specific sources of

information: surveillance (systematic observations of something) and

reconnaissance (observations on a specific occasion).

Traditionally military structures have been very hierarchical, but modern

innovations in communications and computer technology have made a wide range

of other structures possible. At the same time, an emerging emphasis on operations

other than war may require more flexible non-traditional organisational structures.

In this environment, there is a need for formal techniques for the evaluation of a

wide range of organisational structure options. We believe that Social Network

Analysis techniques are the obvious choice for such evaluation.

1.2 Social Network Analysis

Social Network Analysis is an approach to analysing organisations focusing on the

relationships between people and/or groups as the most important aspect. Going

back to the 1950's, it is characterised by adopting mathematical techniques especially

from graph theory [9, 10]. It has applications in organisational psychology, sociology

and anthropology. A good summary is found in [1].

The first goal of Social Network Analysis is to visualise communication and other

relationships between people and/or groups by means of diagrams. The second goal

is to study the factors which influence relationships and to study the correlations

between relationships. The third goal is to draw out implications of the relational

data, including bottlenecks where multiple information flows funnel through one

person or section (slowing down work processes) and situations where information

flows does not match formal group structure. The fourth and most important goal of

Social Network Analysis is to make recommendations to improve communication

and workflow in an organisation, and (in military terms) to speed up the orient-

observe-decide-act (OODA) loop or decision cycle.

Social Network Analysis provides an avenue for analysing and comparing formal

and informal information flows in an organisation, as well as comparing information

flows with officially defined work processes. In previous work, we have applied

Social Network Analysis to military organisations in more or less standard ways [2].

In this paper, we describe an extension to traditional Social Network Analysis for the

specific area of C4ISR architectures which we call the FINC (Force, Intelligence,

Networking and C2) methodology. We have constructed a Java-based tool called

CAVALIER [18], to carry out this and other forms of Social Network Analysis.

剩余39页未读，继续阅读

larosa

粉丝: 0
资源: 3

C4ISR架构与社交网络分析：FINC方法实验

C4ISR体系架构

C4ISR architectures: I. Developing a process for C4ISR architecture design

C4ISR architectures: II. A structured analysis approach for architecture design

C4ISR 架构：I. 开发 C4ISR 架构设计流程

C4ISR architectures: III. An object-oriented approach for architecture design

C4ISR框架设计

什么是C4ISR系统呢

C4ISR系统的作战运用.doc

C4ISR体系[汇编].pdf

建模和验证C4ISR系统的SoS性能要求

最新资源