FENG et al.: VIRTUAL MIMO IN MULTI-CELL DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS: COORDINATED TRANSMISSIONS WITH LARGE-SCALE CSIT 2069
Remote antenna (RA)
Mobile terminal (MT
Central processor (CP)
Intra-cell system backhaul
Inter-cell system backhaul
Fig. 1. Illustration of a multi-cell DAS.
II. SYSTEM MODEL
As illustrated in Fig. 1, the system model for a multi-cell
DAS consists of K cells (indexed with 1, ..., K), and in cell
k,thereareN
k
RAs and an MT
2
equipped with M
k
antennas.
A full-fledged intra-cell system backhaul (e.g., using optical
fibers [45]) is assumed to support the joint signal processing at
the CP within each cell. Moreover, a limited system backhaul
(e.g., using the standardized interface named X2 [45]) is
assumed across the cells so that the large-scale CSIT and some
control signaling needed for coordinated transmissions can be
shared among different CPs.
The received signal of the MT in cell k in the downlink
can be written as
y
(k)
= H
(k,k)
x
(k)
+
K
i=1,i=k
H
(k,i)
x
(i)
+ n
(k)
, (1)
where H
(k,i)
∈ C
M
k
×N
i
denotes the channel matrix between
the RAs in cell i and the MT in cell k, x
(i)
∈ C
N
i
×1
is
the transmit signal for the MT in cell i,andn
(k)
represents
the additive white Gaussian noise with independent entries
distributed according to CN(0,σ
2
). Assuming a total transmit
power constraint for each cell, we have that
tr
E[x
(k)
x
(k)
H
]
= tr(Φ
(k)
) ≤ P
(k)
, (2)
where Φ
(k)
0 denotes the input covariance for the MT in
cell k,andP
(k)
is the transmit power constraint for cell k.
For all k, i =1, ..., K, H
(k,i)
can be modeled as [22][23]
H
(k,i)
= S
(k,i)
L
(k,i)
, (3)
where S
(k,i)
and L
(k,i)
represent the small-scale and the
large-scale fading effects, respectively. The entries of S
(k,i)
are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) according
to CN(0, 1). L
(k,i)
is a diagonal matrix, i.e., L
(k,i)
=
2
There can be multiple MTs in each cell that are served in orthogonal
resource blocks, e.g., different subcarriers for an orthogonal frequency di vi-
sion multiplexing access (OFDMA) system [44], and this work focuses on a
particular resource block.
diag
l
(k,i)
1
, ..., l
(k,i)
N
i
, the entries of which can be expressed
as
l
(k,i)
n
=
D
(k,i)
n
−γ
F
(k,i)
n
,n=1, ..., N
i
, (4)
where D
(k,i)
n
and γ represent the distance and the path-
loss exponent, respectively, and F
(k,i)
n
denotes the shadowing
effect.
III. T
HE COORDINAT ED TRANSMISSION PROBLEM
In this section, we first formulate the coordinated transmis-
sion problem in Section III-A. The problem comes out to be
a quite challenging non-convex problem with a complicated
non-closed-form objective function. In Section III-B, we recast
the problem equivalently as a Max-Min problem, which is
more tractable, allowing us to find a solution via optimization
techniques.
A. Problem Formulation
Base on (1), the interference plus noise suffered by the MT
in cell k can be expressed as
z
(k)
=
K
i=1,i=k
H
(k,i)
x
(i)
+ n
(k)
. (5)
Then, combining (2) and (5), we conclude that the following
sum rate is achievable [13][46]-[49]
R(Φ)=
K
k=1
log
2
det
H
(k,k)
Φ
(k)
H
(k,k)
H
+ Z
(k)
det
Z
(k)
, (6)
where Φ = diag
Φ
(1)
, ..., Φ
(K)
,and
Z
(k)
=
K
i=1,i=k
H
(k,i)
Φ
(i)
H
(k,i)
H
+ σ
2
I
M
k
, (7)
is the covariance matrix of z
(k)
.
When only the large-scale CSIT {L
(k,i)
|k, i =1, ..., K} is
available, the achievable ergodic sum rate, i.e., the achievable
sum rate averaged over the random small-scale CSIT S =
{S
(k,i)
|k, i =1, ..., K}, is of great interest for the system
performance [26][50]. Based on (6) and (7), the achievable
ergodic sum rate can be expressed as (8) on the top of the
next page.
It can be seen from (8) that the input covariances for all
the MTs, i.e., Φ
(1)
, ..., Φ
(K)
, should be jointly optimized so
as to maximize the achievable ergodic sum rate. Under the
transmit power constraint for each cell as expressed in (2),
the coordinated transmission problem can be formulated as
(P1) max
Φ
¯
R(Φ) (9a)
s.t. tr(Φ
(k)
) ≤ P
(k)
, (9b)
Φ
(k)
0,k =1, ..., K. (9c)
It is easy to observe from (8) that
¯
R(Φ) is neither concave
nor convex with respect to {Φ
(k)
|k =1, ..., K} because of
the strong coupling between different cells caused b y ICI. In
addition, due to the expectation operator,
¯
R(Φ),asshown