雷达截面积评估：影响因素与舰船模型解析

需积分: 5 19 浏览量更新于2024-06-27 收藏 2.43MB PDF 举报

本文主要探讨了雷达截面(RCS)评估方法及其对水面舰船的影响因素。在当前的雷达技术中，舰船的设计形状、材料选择以及尺寸是决定其RCS的关键要素。文章详细分析了各种RCS预测模型，这些模型包括但不限于几何建模、散射理论、蒙特卡洛模拟等，每种方法都有其适用的场景和局限性。在舰船形状处理方面，不规则形状和复杂的表面结构会增加RCS的复杂性，因为它们会导致电磁波的散射和反射。通过精确的三维建模，可以更好地理解和控制这些效应。在材料的选择上，不同类型的金属、复合材料和雷达吸收材料(RAM)会直接影响舰船对雷达波的反射性能。例如，使用RAM能够降低舰船的可探测性，但可能会影响舰体的其他性能。舰船尺寸也显著影响RCS，通常大型舰艇由于表面积大，RCS相对较大，而小型舰艇则可通过设计减小暴露的雷达反射面积。此外，舰体的形状和布局（如垂直面和水平面的分布）对RCS有显著影响，如采用线型或低矮的外形设计有助于减少RCS。文章还提到了可用的软件工具，如专用的RCS计算软件、电子战模拟软件以及舰船设计软件集成的RCS模块。这些工具可以帮助工程师在设计阶段进行实时的RCS优化，确保舰船在满足战术需求的同时，尽可能降低被敌方雷达发现的风险。对于哥伦比亚海军而言，理解并应用这些评估方法和参数至关重要，它有助于他们制定有效的舰船设计策略，提高作战效率和生存能力。通过结合舰船设计流程，采用最合适的RCS预测方法，并在实际操作中不断优化，哥伦比亚海军可以确保其水面战舰在现代电子战环境中具备优势。本文为理解与改善水面舰船的雷达隐身性能提供了深入的理论支持和技术指导。

regions are dened depending on the target size in

terms of the incident wavelength as: low-frequency

region or Rayleigh region, resonance region or Mie

region, high-frequency region or optical region.

• Low-frequency region or Rayleigh (2π/λ< 1),

where the induced current in the body of the

target is approximately constant in amplitude

and phase.

• Resonance or Mie region (2π/λ≈1). e phase

variation of the current through the body of

the target is important and all parts contribute

to the dispersion. Generally, λ against 2π/L

will uctuate.

• High-frequency or Opticalregion (2π/λ>1).

ere are many cycles in the variation of the

current phase through the target body and,

consequently, the discrete eld will be a highly

dependent angle (Jenn D. C., 1995).

Methods to predict RCS

Methods are available to make RCS

predictions,such as methods of moments, nite

dierence, microwave optics, and method of

optical physics where many disadvantages can be

found in each of them in terms of high computation

requirements and increased runtime to perform

the prediction;described as the best option is

RCS prediction in the optical physics method

consuming the least amount of computational

resources and with less complexity (Garrido,

2000). It is necessary to validate, in any case, the

accuracy for ranges of frequencies of interest and

the size of the ships to consider.

Modeling and visualization of radar targets

Several types of modeling and visualization of

radar exist such as geometric modeling of solids,

modeling by borders, modeling by Curved Patches,

and Modeling by Facets, which are techniques for

predicting radar cross section that require a realistic

model of the target to impose boundary conditions

of the electromagnetic problem on its surface.

e most common method used today is modeling

by borders through at facets in which the modeled

surface is more similar to the real and results in

much higher prediction (Rius Casals, 1991).

e main drawback of modeling with at facets is

that the performance of the model is dicult when

the radar target presents very complex surface

shapes, as shown in Fig. 3, where the wings and

aircraft turbines have hundreds of facets to achieve

its real constitution.

To achieve a precise model, the facets should be

approximated to the actual surface as much as

necessary at the expense of raising the number

of facets used. e large number of facets, each

characterized by the spatial coordinates of its

vertices, constitutes an extremely large amount of

information to process, requiring a considerable

computational eort even with high-frequency

techniques, although much less than the level

required by discretization with low-frequency

methods.

Physical optical model

It is another of the techniques most commonly

used today to predict cross section of complex

radar targets and it is obtained by consistently

adding the contributions of each of the illuminated

areas (Garrido, 2000).

e method of modeling by facets allows easily

adding the diraction in edges by analyzing the

wedges that form adjacent facets. ese wedges

may correspond to the edges of the real model, such

as the trailing edge of the wings on an airplane or

articial edges due to the creation of facets of the

real curved surface.

e main limitation of the geometrical optics

approximation is to assume innite frequency.

e physical optics approximation introduces

Fig. 3. Boeing 727 modeled with at facets

(Rius Casals, 1991)

Díaz, Gómez

Ship Science & Technology - Vol. 6 - n.° 11 - (91-106) July 2012 - Cartagena (Colombia)

剩余15页未读，继续阅读

eiurijkajk

粉丝: 0
资源: 63

雷达截面积评估：影响因素与舰船模型解析

TOWARDS THE HARMONIZATION OF SAFETY ASSESSMENT METHODS OF AUTOMA

风险建模、评估和管理（risk modeling assessment and management 3rd）

Assessment of severe hailstorms and hail risk using weather radar data

Assessment myths and current fads: A rejoinder to a position paper on nonbiased assessment

GSMA - IoT Security Assessment Process and Checkist.zip

GSMA - IoT Security Assessment Process and Checkist.7z

Vocational assessment involvement and use of the self-directed search by school psychologists

Assessment and treatment of depression in children and adolescents

Merrell, K. W. (1994). Assessment of behavioral, social and emotional problems: Direct and objective methods for use with children and adolescents. New York: Longman, 304 pp., [dollar]49.95

Risk Assessment and Evaluation of Predictions

最新资源