1340 JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 27, NO. 10, MAY 15, 2009
Estimation of the Bit Error Rate for Direct-Detected
OFDM Signals With Optically Preamplified Receivers
Wei-Ren Peng, Kai-Ming Feng, Alan E. Willner, Fellow, IEEE, Fellow, OSA, and Sien Chi, Fellow, OSA
Abstract—In this paper, we provide a numerical bit error rate
(BER) estimation approach for direct-detected orthogonal fre-
quency division multiplexing (OFDM) signals in the presence of
optical preamplified receivers. The individual BER of each subcar-
rier is first computed by considering their electrical signal-to-noise
ratio (SNR), and then the ensemble BER is derived simply by
taking the average of all the subcarriers’ BERs. The calculated
BER is verified by the conventional error-counting approach with
high precision and is still accurate with higher quadratic-ampli-
tude modulation (QAM) formats, even under the influences of
the optical filtering and polarization mode dispersion (PMD) ef-
fects. Based on our simulation approach, the required extra power
budget for 16- and 64-QAM relative to 4-QAM format are found to
be
3.8 and 8.2 dB, respectively, at a BER of 10
9
. Furthermore,
we use this approach to compare the receiving sensitivities and
PMD tolerances for the previous proposed gapped and interleaved
radio-frequency (RF)-tone-assisted OFDM systems. The results
show that the gapped OFDM has a better sensitivity while the
interleaved OFDM has a more PMD-tolerable capability.
Index Terms—Bit error rate (BER), direct detection, optical
fiber communication, orthogonal frequency division multiplexing
(OFDM), optical modulation.
I. INTRODUCTION
O
PTICAL orthogonal frequency division multiplexing
(OFDM) has recently been proposed as a promising
format for optical long-haul transmission since the fiber chro-
matic dispersion (CD) could be electrically compensated for by
digital signal process (DSP) procedures at the receiver [1]–[3].
The direct-detected OFDM, which uses only one photodiode
and thus is very simple to be implemented, with eight-channel
wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) system has been
successfully transmitted through 1000 km of uncompensated
standard single-mode fiber (SSMF) [4], and with single channel
using virtual single sideband OFDM (VSSB-OFDM) format
also has reached 1600 km of SSMF with only
3 dB power
penalty [5]. Moreover, by utilizing the polarization division
Manuscript received July 29, 2008; revised November 23, 2008. First pub-
lished April 24, 2009; current version published May 08, 2009.
W.-R. Peng is with the Department of Photonics and Institute of Electro-
Optical Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, HsinChu 300, Taiwan
(e-mail: pwr.eo92g@nctu.edu.tw).
K.-M. Feng is with the Institute of Communications Engineering, National
Tsing Hua University, HsinChu 300, Taiwan (e-mail: kmfeng@ee.nthu.edu.tw).
A. E. Willner is with the Department of Electrical Engineering, University of
Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA.
S. Chi is with the Yuan-Ze University, Chung Li 320, Taiwan.
Color versions of one or more of the figures in this paper are available online
at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/JLT.2008.2012173
multiplexing (PDM) and the self-polarization diversity re-
ceiving, the capacity of a direct-detected OFDM system can be
further doubled with a moderate receiver complexity [6].
To explore in detail how the signal performance would change
with various system parameters, one direct and simple approach
is to evaluate system performances in terms of the bit error
rate (BER). Conventional BER calculation is evaluated by the
error-counting approach, which typically is time and memory
consuming, because to get a certain degree of statistic confi-
dence at low BER, numerous OFDM symbols have to be gen-
erated for counting the errors bit by bit. Thus, an accurate and
highly efficient BER estimation is crucially desired for under-
standing, designing, and optimizing an OFDM system.
A Q-factor approach, which assumes a Gaussian distribution
for the electrical beat noise and estimates the average electrical
signal-to-noise ratio (ESNR) from the received constellations,
is suggested approximating the BER of a 4-quadratic-ampli-
tude modulation (QAM), direct-detected OFDM system [7], [8].
However, there is no evidence in [7] and [8] to justify how well
this Q-factor approach can match the practical error-counting
method in an OFDM system. Thus, both the appropriateness of
the Q-factor approach, which is simply extracted from the re-
ceived constellations without considering the individual ESNR
of each subcarrier, and the suitability of the Gaussian assump-
tion to the electrical beat noise are still unsolved issues.
In this paper, we show that the exact BER of an optically
preamplified direct-detected OFDM signal can be accurately es-
timated by first evaluating the individual ESNR of each sub-
carrier and then averaging the BERs of all subcarriers [9]. The
ESNR of each subcarrier can be easily obtained by numeri-
cally computing the power spectral density (PSD) of both the
signal and the beat noises. We found that both the PSD of the
received data subcarrier and the beat noises are colored due
to the filtering effect, which also has been described in [10],
thus yielding a nonuniform ESNR distribution over the sub-
carriers. The numerical results, supported by the error-counting
method, show our scheme can well predict the exact BER even
under tight optical filtering or severe polarization mode disper-
sion (PMD) conditions. Moreover, although a larger QAM size
is more spectrally efficient, the required extra power at a BER
of 10
for the 16- and 64-QAM are found to be 3.8 and
8.2 dB, respectively, relative to the 4-QAM format based on
our BER evaluation technique. In addition, by using our ap-
proach, we compare the sensitivities and PMD tolerances at
BER
10 for the previous gapped and interleaved radio-fre-
quency (RF)-tone-assisted OFDM systems. The results show
that the gapped OFDM exhibits a
2.3 dB better sensitivity
0733-8724/$25.00 © 2008 IEEE
Authorized licensed use limited to: Qualcomm. Downloaded on May 8, 2009 at 03:09 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.