Speciation by postzygotic isolation:
forces, genes and molecules
H. Allen Orr* and Daven C. Presgraves
Summary
New species arise as reproductive isolation evolves
between diverging populations. Here we review recent
work in the genetics of postzygotic reproductive isola-
tionÐthe sterility and inviability of species hybrids. Over
the last few years, research has taken two new directions.
First, we have begun to learn a good deal about the
population genetic forces driving the evolution of post-
zygotic isolation. It has, for instance, become increas-
ingly clear that conflict-driven processes, like sexual
selection and meiotic drive, may contribute to the
evolution of hybrid sterility. Second, we have begun to
learn something about the identity and molecular char-
acteristics of the actual genes causing hybrid problems.
Although molecular genetic data are limited, early find-
ings suggest that ``speciation genes'' correspond to loci
having normal functions within species and that these
loci sometimes diverge as a consequence of evolution in
gene regulation. BioEssays 22:1085±1094, 2000.
ß 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Introduction
SpeciationÐthe splitting of one species into twoÐoccupies a
unique place in the theory of evolution. Although a micro-
evolutionary process, speciation ultimately gives rise to the
macroevolutionary relationships we see reflected in phylo-
geny. Despite this special position, the history of speciation
research has been curiously episodic: periods of intense work
have been separated by many years of neglect.
In the first period of sustained work, Darwin, Wallace,
Jordan, Wagner and others came to realize that species are
mutable and wrestled with the roles of adaptation and geo-
graphic isolation in their origin. In the second period, the foun-
ders of the Modern Synthesis profoundly transformed our
understanding of just what species are and, in turn, of what it
means for species to split. Dobzhansky and Mayr, in particular,
championed the Biological Species Concept, the view that
species are characterized by their reproductive isolation from
each other, not by differences in morphology. This reproduc-
tive isolation, they argued, takes two forms: prezygotic and
postzygotic. In the former, barriers such as courtship
differences prevent the actual formation of hybrid zygotes
while, in the latter, barriers such as hybrid sterility or inviability
bar the flow of genes between species through hybrids. In both
cases, reproductive isolation ensures that species remain
genetically distinct and, consequently, that they can undergo
independent evolutionary fates.
In the third periodÐwhich began in the early 1980's and
which followed forty years of relative neglectÐattention
shifted to the genetics of speciation. Although much has been
learned during this period, progress has centered on a fairly
narrow class of problems. We now know a good deal, for
instance, about the number of genes that cause reproductive
isolation as well as their locations in the genome. We also
understand, at least roughly, the causes of several patterns
that characterize speciation. The best known of these is
Haldane's rule, the preferential sterility and inviability of
hybrids of the heterogametic [XY] sex.
(1±3)
And last, we now
possess a reasonably rich population genetic theory of
speciation, a theory that did not exist fifteen years ago and
that has yielded a number of novel predictions about the
evolution of reproductive isolation.
(4±6)
While these develop-
ments represent real accomplishments, they share a certain
focus. They all concern what might be called the classical or
``black box'' genetics of speciation. Only now are we beginning
to open this box, getting our first glimpse of the detailed forces,
genes and molecules that underlie reproductive isolation. We
believe that these new studies may represent a nascent fourth
period in the study of speciation.
Our goal here is to summarize some of these recent
developments. Given, however, that the speciation literature
has been heavily reviewed, it might be best if we first make
clear what we will
not do. We will not be concerned here with
the geography or ecology of speciation. Nor will we consider
prezygotic isolation in any detail. Instead, we focus on intrinsic
postzygotic isolation, i.e., on hybrid sterility and inviability,
particularly on the genetics and molecular bases of hybrid
problems, rather than on comparative patterns like Haldane's
rule. We make these restrictions for several reasons. For one,
we know much more about the genetics of hybrid sterility and
inviability than about any other form of isolation and there is
good reason to believe that there will be major advances in this
field soon. For another, while broad patterns like Haldane's
rule have received a great deal of attention, progress on the
BioEssays 22:1085±1094, ß 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. BioEssays 22.12 1085
Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Funding agencies: NIH; Grant Number: GM51932; David and Lucile
Packard Foundation.
*Correspondence to: H. Allen Orr, Department of Biology, University of
Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627.
Review articles