other mainstream Free Software distributions, or even of popular proprietary operating systems.
Chances are that you can associate each of them with a large company that is either the main de-
velopment force behind the project, or at the very least the steward of all its non-development
activities. Debian is different. Within the Debian Project volunteers pick on themselves the re-
sponsibilities of all the activities that are needed to keep Debian alive and kicking. The variety
of those activities is stunning: from translations to system administration, from marketing to
management, from conference organization to artwork design, from bookkeeping to legal is-
sues, ... not to mention software packaging and development! Debian contributors take care of
all of these.
As a first consequence of this radical form of independence, Debian needs and relies on a very
diverse community of volunteers. Any skill in any of the above areas, or others you can imagine,
can be invested into Debian and will be used to improve the project. A second consequence of
Debian independence is that Debian's choices can be trusted not to be driven by the commercial
interests of specific companies — interests that we have no guarantee will always be aligned with
the goal of promoting people's control over machines, as too many recent examples in the tech
news testify.
One last aspect contributes to Debian's uniqueness: the way in which the social experiment
is run. Despite the folklore of being bureaucratic, decision making in Debian is in fact highly
unstructured, almost anarchic. There exist clearly defined areas of responsibility within the
project. People in charge of those areas are free to drive their own boat. As long as they keep up
with the quality requirements agreed upon by the community, no one can tell them what to do
or how to do their job. If you want to have a say on how something is done in Debian, you need
to put yourself on the line and be ready to take the job on your shoulders. This peculiar form
of meritocracy — which we sometimes call do-ocracy — is very empowering for contributors.
Anyone with enough skills, time, and motivation can have a real impact on the direction the
project is taking. This is testified by a population of about 1 000 official members of the Debian
Project, and several thousands of contributors world-wide. It is no wonder that Debian is often
credited as the largest community-driven Free Software project in existence.
So Debian is quite unique. Are we the only ones noticing this? Definitely not. According to
DistroWatch
2
there are about 300 active Free Software distributions around. Half of that (about
140) are Debian derivatives. That means that they start from Debian, adapt it to fit the needs of
their users — usually by adding, modifying, and rebuilding packages — and release the resulting
product. In essence, derivatives apply the Free Software granted freedoms of modifying and
redistributing copies not only to individual pieces of software, but to a distribution as a whole.
The potential of reaching out to new Free Software users and contributors by the means of
derivative distributions is huge. We believe that it is mainly thanks to that thriving ecosystem
that Free Software is nowadays finally rivaling with proprietary software in fields which were
historically considered hard to conquer, such as large desktop deployments. Debian sits at the
root of the largest ecosystem of Free Software distributions in existence: even if you are not
using Debian directly, and even if your distributor has not told you, chances are that you are
benefiting right now from the work of the Debian community.
2
http://distrowatch.com/
XVI
The Debian Administrator's Handbook