moderated with a degree of realism reflecting the technology's strengths
and capabilities.
Any end user considering developing a MEMS solution or incorporat-
ing one into a design invariably reaches the difficult question of "Why
MEMS?" The question strikes at the heart of the technology, particularly
in view of competing methods, such as conventional machining or plastic
molding techniques that do not have recourse to micromachining. For
applications that can benefit from existing commercial MEMS products
(e.g., pressure or acceleration sensors), the answer to the above question
relies on the ability to meet required specifications and pricing. But the
vast majority of applications require unique solutions that often necessi-
tate the funding and completion of an evaluation or development
program. In such situations, a clear-cut answer is seldom easy to establish.
In practice, a MEMS solution becomes attractive if it enables a new
function, provides significant cost reduction, or both. For instance, medi-
cal applications generally seem to focus on added or enabled functionality
and improved performance, whereas automotive applications often seek
cost reduction. Size reduction can play an important selling role, but is
seldom sufficient as the sole reason unless it becomes enabling itself.
Naturally, reliability is always a dictated requirement. The
decision-
making process is further complicated by the fact that MEMS is not
a single technology, but a set of technologies (e.g., surface vs. bulk
micromachining). At this point, it is beneficial for the end user to become
familiar with the capabilities and the limitations of any particular MEMS
technology selected for the application in mind. The active participation
of the end user allows for the application to drive the technology develop-
ment, rather than the frequently occurring opposite situation.
Companies seeking MEMS solutions often contract a specialized facil-
ity for the design and manufacture of the product. Others choose first to
evaluate basic conceptual designs through existing foundry services. A
few companies may decide to internally develop a complete design. In
the
latter case, there is considerable risk that manufacturing considerations
are not properly taken into account, resulting in significant challenges in
production.
Regardless of how exciting and promising a technology may be, its
ultimate realization is invariably dependent on economic success. The
end user will justify the technology on the basis of added value, increased
productivity,
and/or cost competitiveness, and the manufacturer must
MEMS:
A
Techno10g.v
from
Lilliput
9
show revenues and profits. On both tracks, MEMS technology is able to
deliver within a set of realistic expectations that may vary with the end
application. A key element in cost competitiveness is "batch fabrication,"
which is the practice of simultaneously manufacturing hundreds or thou-
sands of identical parts, thus diluting the overall impact of fixed costs,
including the cost of maintaining expensive cleanroom and assembly
facilities. This is precisely the same approach that has resulted, over the
last few decades, in a dramatic decrease in the price of computer memory
chips. Unfortunately, the argument works in reverse too: Small manufac-
turing volumes will bear the full burden of overhead expenses, regardless
of how "enabling" the technology may be (Figure
1.1).
Standards
Few disagree that the burgeoning MEMS industry traces many of its
roots to the integrated circuit industry. However, the two market dynam-
ics differ greatly with severe implications, one of which is the lack
of standards in MEMS. Complementary metal-oxide semiconductor
(CMOS) technology has proven itself over the years to be a universally
accepted manufacturing process for integrated circuits, driven primarily
by the insatiable consumer demand for computers and digital electronics.
In contrast, the lack of a dominant MEMS high-volume product, or fam-
ily of products, combined with the unique technical requirements of
Figure
1.1
Volume manufacturing is essential for maintaining
profitability.