CMS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 83–104 87
Table 1
Minimum
L
T
requirements and search windows for each EGM W
mass point along with the number of expected background events (N
bkg
), observed events (N
obs
), expected
W
signal events (N
sig
), and the product of the signal efficiency and acceptance (ε
sig
×Acc.). The indicated uncertainties are statistical only.
W
mass (GeV) L
T
(GeV) M
WZ
window (GeV) N
bkg
N
obs
N
sig
ε
sig
×Acc. (%)
170 110 163–177 9.0 ±0.3818±11.33 ±0.09
180 115 172–188 38
±2 49 140 ±71.97 ±0.09
190 120 181–199 62
±1 76 371 ±14 2.6 ±0.1
200 125 190–210 81
±4 86 610 ±20 3.2 ±0.1
210 130 199–221 86
±3 101 786 ±23 3.9 ±0.1
220 135 208–232 91
±3 84 896 ±24 4.5 ±0.1
230 140 217–243 92
±4 80 977 ±25 5.2 ±0.1
240 145 226–254 91
±4841011±24 5.8 ±0.1
250 150 235–265 82
±1851021±23 6.4 ±0.1
275 162 258–292 73
±3 85 970 ±20 8.0 ±0.2
300 175 280–320 60
±1 74 858 ±16 9.6 ±0.2
325 188 302–348 56
±3 53 792 ±13 11.8 ±0.2
350 200 325–375 48
±3 37 699 ±10 13.9 ±0.2
400 225 370–430 32
±1 40 542 ±718.1 ±0.2
450 250 415–485 23
.1 ±0.8 26 399 ±521.5 ±0.2
500 275 460–540 16
.6 ±0.5 13 297 ±324.8 ±0.3
550 300 505–595 13
.2 ±0.6 14 220 ±227.6 ±0.3
600 325 550–650 10
.0 ±0.5 10 167 ±230.4 ±0.3
700 375 640–760 4
.7 ±0.2496.9 ±0.834.3±0.3
800 425 730–870 2
.8 ±0.2556.5 ±0.536.5±0.3
900 475 820–980 2
.1 ±0.2435.0 ±0.338.6±0.3
1000 500 910–1090 1
.4 ±0.1023.7 ±0.243.3±0.3
1100 500 1000–1200 0
.8 ±0.1015.9 ±0.146.8 ±0.3
1200 500 1080–1320 0
.58 ±0.08 1 10.77 ±0.07 49.1 ±0.3
1300 500 1108–1492 0
.56 ±0.08 1 8.20 ±0.04 56.1 ±0.3
1400 500 1135–1665 0
.60 ±0.08 1 5.64 ±0.03 57.3 ±0.3
1500 500 1162–1838 0
.57 ±0.08 1 3.76 ±0.02 57.5 ±0.3
1600 500 1190–2010 0
.56 ±0.08 1 2.56 ±0.01 57.7 ±0.3
1700 500 1218–2182 0
.50 ±0.08 1 1.782 ±0.009 57.6 ±0.3
1800 500 1245–2355 0
.44 ±0.07 1 1.255 ±0.007 58.0 ±0.3
1900 500 1272–2528 0
.39 ±0.07 0 0.844 ±0.005 55.0 ±0.3
2000 500 1300–2700 0
.36 ±0.07 0 0.595 ±0.003 54.7 ±0.3
Fig. 2. Limits at 95% CL on σ × B(W
→ 3ν) as a function of the mass of the
EGM W
(blue) and ρ
TC
(red), along with the 1σ and 2σ combined statisti-
cal
and systematic uncertainties indicated by the green (dark) and yellow (light)
bands, respectively. The theoretical cross sections include a mass-dependent NNLO
K-factor. The thickness of the theory lines represents the PDF uncertainty associ-
ated
with the signal cross sections. The predicted cross sections for ρ
TC
assume
that M
π
TC
=
3
4
M
ρ
TC
− 25 GeV and that the LSTC parameter sin χ = 1/3. (For inter-
pretation
of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to
the web version of this article.)
Finally, an additional uncertainty of 2.6% due to the measure-
ment
of the integrated luminosity is included [59]. Table 2 presents
a summary of the above systematic uncertainties.
Table 2
Summary
of systematic uncertainties. Values are given for the impact on signal and
background event yields. When the value of the uncertainty differs between the
different decay modes of the Wand Z bosons and/or between different W
masses
considered, a range is quoted in order to provide an idea of the magnitude of the
uncertainty, i.e. its impact.
Systematic uncertainty Signal impact Background impact
E
miss
T
resolution & scale 1–3% 1–23%
Muon p
T
resolution 1–3% 0.5–5%
Muon p
T
scale 1–2% 1–22%
Electron energy scale & resolution 0.5–2% 1.5–12%
Pileup 0.1–0.8% 0.5–5%
Electron trigger efficiency 2% 2%
Electron reconstruction efficiency 2% 2%
Electron ID & isolation efficiencies 1% 1%
Muon trigger efficiency 5% 5%
Muon reconstruction efficiency 2% 2%
Muon ID & isolation efficiencies 3% 3%
Z
+jets – 30%
t
¯
t – 15%
Z
γ –50%
ZZ – 30%
WZ PDF – 5–10%
WZ scale – 5–15%
WZ MadGraph modeling – 5–30%
Luminosity 2.6% 2.6%
6. Results
As shown in Fig. 1, the data are compatible with the ex-
pected
SM background and no significant excess is observed. Ex-
clusion
limits on the production cross section σ (pp → W
/ρ
TC
→
WZ) × B(WZ → 3ν) are determined using a counting experiment
and comparing the number of observed events to the number of