For incommensurate magnetic structures the general formalism must be applied. When the magnetic
structure is described using the formalism of propagation vectors, the components M
x
, M
y
, M
z
no longer
represent true magnetic moments (see mathematical section). The user should be cautious in interpreting
the output files. The modulus of the "magnetic moment" represents the Fourier component modulus of an
atomic magnetic moment which have to be calculated externally. The calculation of the intensity is based
on the expression of magnetic structure factor given in mathematical section; therefore the user knows
how to play with his input items in order to obtain physically sound results.
For the spherical description of the magnetic moments the following must be taken into account:
• The orthonormal system with respect to which are defined the spherical angles verifies:
X axis coincides with the crystallographic a-axis
Y axis belongs to the plane a-b
Z-axis is perpendicular to the plane a-b
The particular implementation of spherical components in magnetic structure refinements is that the Z-
axis must coincide with c. This works in all crystallographic systems except for triclinic. The monoclinic
setting must be changed to the setting 1 1 2/m to satisfy the above prescription.
Propagation vectors
A complete list of reflections can be generated when propagation vectors of an incommensurate structure
are present. To each fundamental reflection it is added the corresponding satellites. For n propagation
vectors k
1
, k
2
,... k
n
, there are n satellites obtained from each fundamental reciprocal lattice vector h:
Fundamental reflection: h = (h, k, l)
Satellites h
1
=h+ k
1
, h
2
=h+ k
2
,... h
n
=h+ k
n
In the present version of the program no symmetry analysis is performed. We recommend to use the
triclinic space group of symbol L -1 (where L = P, A, B, C, F, I, R) in order to have a full set of reflections
with the proper multiplicity when the true magnetic symmetry is not known.
The program generates first a list of unique reflections corresponding to the required space group and
then adds the satellites. This method had to be modified for reflections belonging to the boundary planes
and lines of the asymmetric region of the reciprocal space in order to obtain the correct number of
reflections and not miss (or repeat) some of them. Be careful with propagation vectors k equivalent to -k!
Two vectors k
1
and k
2
are "equivalent" if k
1
-k
2
is a vector of the reciprocal lattice. So, for k
1
≡-k
2
, if
H=2k
1
belongs to the reciprocal lattice, k
1
is single and belongs to a point of high symmetry of the
Brillouin Zone. In such cases only ONE propagation vectors should be introduced
Nvk
=1, if the user puts
Nvk
=-1, the satellite reflections are not correctly generated.
For centred cells a propagation vector k having components ±1/2, verifies that 2k has integer
components, but that does not mean that k and -k are equivalent, because 2k could not belong to the
reciprocal lattice. For a C lattice the propagation vector k
1
=(1/2 0 0) is not equivalent to k
2
=(-1/2 0 0)
because K=2k
1
=k
1
-k
2
=(1 0 0) does not belong to the reciprocal lattice: h+k=2n is the lattice C condition
for components (hkl). On the contrary, the vector (0 0 1/2) is single because (001) is a reciprocal lattice
point of the C lattice.
Microstrains and domain size effects. HKL-dependent shifts and asymmetry
The microstructural effects within FullProf are treated using the Voigt approximation: both instrumental
and sample intrinsic profile are supposed to be described approximately by a convolution of Lorentzian
and Gaussian components. The TCH pseudo-Voigt profile function (Thompson, Cox and Hastings, J.
Appl. Cryst. 20, 79 (1987)) is used to mimic the exact Voigt function and it includes the Finger‘s
treatment of the axial divergence (L.W. Finger, J. Appl. Cryst. 31, 111 (1998)). The integral breadth