
UNCORRECTED PROOF
JID:NUPHB AID:14419 /FLA [m1+; v1.287; Prn:13/08/2018; 10:41] P.9 (1-43)
A. Lewandowski / Nuclear Physics B ••• (••••) •••–••• 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
A
α
μ
with the eigenvector ζ
α
V [λ
r
]
and the appropriate (canonically normalized) polarization vector
e
μ
(p, m
V(λ)
) or e
μ
(p, m
V(λ)
)
.
In the presence of spontaneous breaking of some gauge
symmetries, it is also necessary to
identify those terms in the decomposition (12)of the asymptotic scalar field which create/anni-
hilate physical states. This is particularly easy if there are no Goldstone bosons of spontaneously
broken global symmetries
14
as then all fields
r
corresponding to m
S()
= 0 create would-be
Goldstone bosons while all remaining fields are associated with physical particles. If the true
Goldstone bosons are present (e.g. in the singlet Majoron model [34], see also Section 4.2), we
need a prescription for identifying massless eigenvectors ζ
S[
r
]
associated with them. The gauge
symmetry implies that the eigenvectors ζ
S[
r
]
corresponding to the would-be Goldstone bosons
are linear combinations of vectors
15
T
α
v. The orthogonality condition (9) then suggests that of
all vectors ζ
S[
r
]
associated with poles at p
2
= 0, to physical massless states should correspond
vectors ζ
S[
r
]
such that
ζ
S[
r
]
1 −M
2
S
(0)
T
α
v = 0 , (22)
for all indices α.
16
In Sec. 5.5 we will show that the states of the asymptotic Fock spaces asso-
ciated with eigenvectors ζ
S[
r
]
obeying this condition do indeed belong to the physical subspace
of the kernel of BRST charge.
It should be also stressed that the normalization condition, which for vectors ζ
j
S[]
takes the
form (9), has to be slightly modified in order to avoid spurious infrared divergences. Take, for
instance, the Z-photon block of the Standard Model (SM, see e.g. [1]); the 2-by-2 matrix M
2
V
(0)
(more precisely, its ZZ entry) is IR divergent at one-loop order, however the photonic singularity
is still a pole. The IR-finiteness of the whole matrix M
2
V
(0) is therefore too strong a requirement.
In Sec. 5.3 we will show that Eq. (20) holds provided M
2
V
(s) is continuous at each m
2
V(λ)
and
that the limit
lim
q
2
→m
2
V(λ)
M
2
V
(q
2
)ξ
, (23)
exists for each ξ belonging to the eigenspace
17
M
2
V
(m
2
V(λ)
) associated with m
2
V(λ)
.
The vectors ζ
V [λ
r
]
appearing in (20)are then elements of a basis of the eigenspace
M
2
V
(m
2
V(λ)
)ζ
V [λ
r
]
=m
2
V(λ)
ζ
V [λ
r
]
, (24)
obeying the normalization conditions
lim
q
2
→m
2
V(λ)
ζ
V [λ
r
]
1 −M
2
V
(q
2
)
ζ
V [λ
t
]
=δ
rt
. (25)
Furthermore, if massless spin 1 particles are present, an additional assumption is necessary to
ensure that the singularity of the full propagator (19)at q
2
=0is a (second order) pole: the limit
14
Of physical spin 0 particles, only Goldstone bosons can naturally be massless.
15
More precisely, this fact follows from the “non-renormalization theorem” expressed by the relation (87), which is a
manifestation of an additional symmetry of the action specific for the Landau gauge [22].
16
At the tree-level this reduces to a well-known condition (see e.g. (1.1) in [27]).
17
As before, we have to assume that each generalized eigenvector of M
2
V
(m
2
V(λ)
) associated with the eigenvalue m
2
V(λ)
is an ordinary eigenvector.