Physics Letters B 736 (2014) 411–414
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Physics Letters B
www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb
On the momentum dependence of the flavor structure
of
the nucleon sea
Jen-Chieh Peng
a
, Wen-Chen Chang
b
, Hai-Yang Cheng
b
, Tie-Jiun Hou
b
, Keh-Fei Liu
c
,
Jian-Wei Qiu
d,e
a
Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
b
Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan
c
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
d
Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
e
C.N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received
16 May 2014
Received
in revised form 1 July 2014
Accepted
28 July 2014
Available
online 1 August 2014
Editor:
D.F. Geesaman
Keywords:
Parton
distributions
Sea
quark
¯
d(x) −
¯
u(x)
Lattice QCD
Difference between the
¯
u and
¯
d sea quark distributions in the proton was first observed in the violation
of the Gottfried sum rule in deep-inelastic scattering (DIS) experiments. The parton momentum fraction
x dependence of this difference has been measured over the region 0.02 < x < 0.35 from Drell–Yan and
semi-inclusive DIS experiments. The Drell–Yan data suggested a possible sign-change for
¯
d(x) −
¯
u(x) near
x ∼ 0.3, which has not yet been explained by existing theoretical models. We present an independent
evidence for the
¯
d(x) −
¯
u(x) sign-change at x ∼ 0.3from an analysis of the DIS data. We further discuss
the x-dependence of
¯
d −
¯
u in the context of meson cloud model and the lattice QCD formulation.
© 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). Funded by SCOAP
3
.
It is now a well established fact that the
¯
u and
¯
d distribu-
tions
in the proton are strikingly different. The first evidence for
this difference came from the observation of the violation of the
Gottfried sum rule [1] in a deep-inelastic scattering (DIS) ex-
periment
by the NMC Collaboration [2]. The Gottfried sum rule,
I
G
≡
1
0
[F
p
2
(x
B
) − F
n
2
(x
B
)]/x
B
dx
B
= 1/3, is obtained under the as-
sumption
of a symmetric
¯
u and
¯
d sea [1], where x
B
is the Bjorken
variable and is effectively equal to parton momentum fraction x
probed
in DIS using the leading order QCD factorization formal-
ism
of the structure function F
2
(x
B
). The NMC measurement of
I
G
= 0.235 ± 0.026 implies that this assumption is invalid with an
x-integrated difference of
1
0
[
¯
d(x) −
¯
u(x)]dx = 0.148 ± 0.039.
The
NMC result was subsequently checked using two indepen-
dent
experimental techniques. From measurements of the Drell–
Yan
cross section ratios of [σ (p + d)]/[σ (p + p)], the NA51 [3] and
the Fermilab E866 [4] experiments measured
¯
d/
¯
u as a function of x
over
the kinematic range of 0.015 < x < 0.35. As shown in Fig. 1,
the
¯
d/
¯
u ratios clearly differ from unity. From a semi-inclusive DIS
measurement, the HERMES Collaboration also reported the obser-
vation [5] of
¯
d(x) −
¯
u(x) = 0, consistent with the Drell–Yan results.
The
¯
d(x)/
¯
u(x) data obtained from the Drell–Yan experiments
have provided stringent constraints for parameterizing the parton
distribution functions (PDFs). Fig. 1 compares the data measured
at Q
2
= 54 GeV
2
from Fermilab E866 with parameterizations of
several PDFs. The E866 data show the salient feature that
¯
d/
¯
u
rises
linearly with x for x < 0.15 and then drops as x further in-
creases.
At the largest value of x (x = 0.315), the
¯
d/
¯
u ratio falls
below unity, albeit with large experimental uncertainty. This in-
triguing
x-dependence of
¯
d/
¯
u is reflected in recent PDFs including
CTEQ6 [6], CT10 [7], MSTW08 [8], and JR14 [9]. However, for the
CTEQ4M [10] PDF, which predated the E866 data, the
¯
d/
¯
u ra-
tios
at large x are not well described by the parameterizations.
In particular,
¯
d(x)/
¯
u(x) remains greater than unity, or equivalently,
¯
d(x) −
¯
u(x) > 0, at all x. The parameterizations of the more re-
cent
PDFs are sufficiently flexible to accommodate a sign-change
for
¯
d(x) −
¯
u(x) at x ∼ 0.3, as suggested by the E866 data.
Many
theoretical models have been put forward to explain the
surprisingly large difference between
¯
d(x) and
¯
u(x). For reviews on
various
theoretical models, see Refs. [11–15]. While these models
can explain the enhancement of
¯
d over
¯
u involving various mecha-
nisms
such as meson cloud, chiral-quark, intrinsic sea, soliton, and
Pauli-blocking, none of them predicts that the
¯
d/
¯
u ratio falls be-
low
unity at any value of x [14]. In order to understand the origin
of the sea-quark flavor structure, it is important to improve the
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.07.050
0370-2693/
© 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). Funded by
SCOAP
3
.