482 S.-F. Ge et al. / Physics Letters B 757 (2016) 480–492
The observed sizable di-photon rate at M
γγ
≈ 750 GeV and the
absence of dijet excess in the same mass region so far suggests that
the new resonance S
0
should have enhanced decay rate into di-
photons.
This indicates that the heavy quarks may have larger elec-
tric
charges and thus enhanced couplings with di-photons. For this,
we introduce a weak doublet of vector-like quarks, T = (T
, T )
T
,
with hypercharge Y =
7
6
and thus the electric charges
5
3
,
2
3
,
where the heavy quark T shares the same electric charge with
the SM up-type quarks.
According to the model construction in Table 1, we write down
the relevant Yukawa interactions including the Yukawa interaction
between the vector-like quark doublet T and singlet scalar S , as
well as the Yukawa interactions between T and light SM up-type
quarks,
L
Tu
=−y
ij
Q
iL
Hu
jR
−
˜
y
j
T
L
Hu
jR
−
1
2
˜
y
S
S
+
TT
−
1
2
M
0
TT +h.c., (2.3)
where
H = iτ
2
H
∗
, and i, j =1, 2 stand for flavor indices of the first
and second family fermions. We see that T does not mix with third
family top quark due to Z
2
symmetry. The Yukawa coupling
˜
y
S
in
Eq. (2.3) is real, since the singlet S interactions conserve CP. Be-
sides,
all interactions respect Z
2
symmetry, and the only possible
soft breaking term of Z
2
is the bare mass term (M
0
) of vector-like
quark doublet T. Eq. (2.3) gives the following mixing mass matrix
for u
j
( j = 1, 2) and T ,
1
M
u
j
T
=
1
√
2
⎧
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎩
y
11
vy
12
v 0
y
21
vy
22
v 0
˜
y
1
v
˜
y
2
v
˜
y
S
u +
√
2M
0
⎫
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎭
,
(2.4)
where the (3, 3)-component contains both the VEV contribution
term
˜
y
S
u/
√
2[from the third term of Eq. (2.3)] and the bare mass
term M
0
[from the fourth term of Eq. (2.3)]. For our purpose, we
consider the parameter space of
˜
y
j
v
˜
y
S
u +
√
2M
0
. Taking the
small non-diagonal couplings
˜
y
1,2
being comparable, we estimate
the small mixing of T and u
j
, θ
Lj
≈ y
jj
˜
y
j
v
2
/(
˜
y
S
u +
√
2M
0
)
2
for
the left-handed quarks, and θ
Rj
≈
˜
y
j
v/(
˜
y
S
u +
√
2M
0
) for the right-
handed
quarks. Thus, we have nearly degenerate heavy quarks,
M
T
≈ M
T
≈
1
√
2
˜
y
S
u + M
0
. (2.5)
The small mixing couplings
˜
y
j
will induce T and T
decays.
The heavy quark T has two main decay channels, T → u
j
h and
T → d
j
W
+
, while T
dominantly decays via T
→ u
j
W
+
. We
find that for channels T → d
j
W
+
, u
j
Z and T
→ u
j
W
+
, the de-
cay
amplitudes are dominated by the final state with longitudinal
polarization W
+
L
. Since M
T
M
W
, we can apply equivalence the-
orem [15] to
compute the corresponding Goldstone amplitudes
with W
+
L
replaced by π
+
. Thus, we estimate the leading decay
width for each channel as follows,
1
We also note that the small quark mixings between the light families and
the third family can arise from dimension-5 effective operators involving singlet
scalar, (y
it
/)S
+
Q
iL
Ht
R
and (y
ib
/)S
+
Q
iL
Hb
R
, where i = 1, 2and is the cut-
off.
Such effective operators will induce the desired small CKM mixings. They may
result from integrating out a heavy Higgs doublet H
which is Z
2
odd and can re-
alize
dimension-4 Yukawa terms between the light families and the third family,
y
it
Q
iL
H
t
R
and y
ib
Q
iL
H
b
R
. Adding this heavy Higgs doublet H
will increase the
scalar degrees of freedom and make vacuum stability much easier, but does not
change the main physics picture. For the current purpose of accommodating the
diphoton excess, we focus on the minimal setup for simplicity.
Table 2
Coupling
ratios ξ
hXY
and ξ
SXY
of the Higgs bosons h and S, relative to the SM
counterparts, where V = W , Z , and the SM Yukawa coupling is y
f
=m
f
/v.
XY f
¯
fVVTT
ξ
hXY
c
α
c
α
s
α
(
˜
y
S
/y
t
)
ξ
SXY
−s
α
−s
α
c
α
(
˜
y
S
/y
t
)
[T →u
j
h]≈
˜
y
2
j
16π
M
T
,[T →d
j
W
+
, u
j
Z]≈
y
2
jj
θ
2
Rj
32π
M
T
,
[
T
→u
j
W
+
]≈
˜
y
2
j
32π
M
T
. (2.6)
It is clear that T → u
j
h is the dominant decay mode for T . For
later analysis, we will consider the parameter range, 10
−5
˜
y
j
10
−3
. This is sufficient to evade the flavor constraints involving
the first two family quarks, and the tiny mixing coupling
˜
y
j
is
negligible in our later analysis of renormalization group running
and collider studies. Furthermore, this ensures that the lifetimes
of T and T
are much smaller than 10
−13
s. So they are short-
lived
and will have prompt decays inside the detector [16]. The
searches of heavy vector-like quarks via prompt decays put non-
trivial
constraints on the new quark masses. The limits on their
decays into a light quark are weaker than that into top or bot-
tom.
For T
→ u
j
W
+
, the limit is M
T
690 GeV, while the decay
channel T → u
j
h is much less constrained [17].
3. New particle decays and production
In the physical vacuum, the Higgs doublet H and singlet S ac-
quire
nonzero VEVs, as shown in (2.1). This spontaneously breaks
SU(2)
L
⊗U(1)
Y
⊗Z
2
down to U(1)
em
, while the CP symmetry is re-
tained.
The CP-even states (h
0
, S
0
) can mix with each other via h =
c
α
h
0
+ s
α
S
0
and S = c
α
S
0
− s
α
h
0
, where (c
α
, s
α
) ≡ (cos α, sin α).
The mixing angle α is determined by diagonalizing the mass ma-
trix,
M
2
N
=
⎧
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎩
2λ
1
v
2
λ
3
vu
λ
3
vu 2λ
2
u
2
⎫
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎭
, =⇒ (M
2
N
)
diag
=
⎧
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎩
M
2
h
0
0 M
2
S
⎫
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎭
,
(3.1)
with
tan 2α =
λ
3
vu
λ
1
v
2
−λ
2
u
2
. (3.2)
Alternatively, we may resolve the 3 involved scalar couplings
(λ
1
, λ
2
, λ
3
) in terms of the measured mass-eigenvalues (M
h
, M
S
)
(
125, 750) GeV, the known light Higgs VEV v 246 GeV, and the
Higgs mixing angle α (which is taken as an input parameter, but
will be constrained by the LHC data). Thus, we have,
λ
1
=
M
2
h
c
2
α
+M
2
S
s
2
α
2v
2
,λ
2
=
M
2
S
c
2
α
+M
2
h
s
2
α
2u
2
,
λ
3
=
s
α
c
α
(M
2
h
−M
2
S
)
uv
. (3.3)
Although the singlet scalar S does not couple to the SM fermions
and gauge bosons, the mixing between the two CP-even compo-
nents
S
0
and h
0
will induce these couplings suppressed by sin α.
Table 2 summarizes the coupling ratios ξ
hXY
and ξ
SXY
relative to
the SM counterparts, for the mass-eigenstates h and S.
Inspecting
the cubic scalar coupling of Shh vertex and using
Eq. (3.3), we derive its compact form as follows,
G
Shh
=
s
α
c
α
(uc
α
− vs
α
)
uv
(M
2
S
+2M
2
h
). (3.4)