没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
首页中国金融科技崛起:腾讯、蚂蚁等引领行业创新
中国金融科技崛起:腾讯、蚂蚁等引领行业创新
需积分: 10 2 下载量 162 浏览量
更新于2024-07-09
收藏 10.16MB PDF 举报
"《高盛-中国金融科技的崛起》行业报告显示,随着科技巨头如腾讯、蚂蚁金服、京东金融和平安集团等在中国金融科技领域的蓬勃发展,这些创新者正深刻改变着中国的消费支付、借贷和投资模式。它们通过智能手机的便捷应用,提供了从快速支付到在线储蓄产品和贷款的一站式金融服务,显著满足了消费者日益增长的金融需求,传统银行业面临着前所未有的竞争压力。 报告指出,由于高盛在涉及其研究报告的公司中开展业务,投资者需意识到可能存在的利益冲突,这可能会影响报告的客观性。因此,在做出投资决策时,这份报告应被视为众多因素中的一个。为了获取更全面的信息,投资者应参考附录中的披露信息,或访问高盛官方网站www.gs.com/research/hedge.html,了解关于注册分析师和美国 FINRA 认证的相关声明。值得注意的是,非美国附属公司的分析师在美国并不被注册或认定为具备研究分析师资格。 作为全球领先的金融机构,高盛集团于2017年8月7日发布这份研究报告,它标志着中国金融科技行业的崭新阶段,即所谓的“中国金融科技崛起”。在该系列的第一篇中,焦点主要集中在这一新兴市场的独特机遇和技术创新如何驱动巨大的盈利潜力。这些金融科技企业不仅重塑了金融服务的面貌,也为投资者打开了一个全新的投资领域,对于关注中国经济发展和科技革新的人来说,这是一个不容忽视的重要趋势。"
资源详情
资源推荐
August 7, 2017
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 13
The integration mind set
Did you know? In these companies’ 2016 annual reports....
95 times: Alibaba mentioned the word ‘Ecosystem’
35 times: Ping An mentioned the word ‘Integrated finance/financial’, ‘Ecosystem’, or ‘One-stop’
13 times: Tencent mentioned the word ‘Ecosystem’, or ‘”Connection” strategy’, or
‘Connection/connected’*
13 times: JD mentioned the word ‘One-stop’ or ‘Comprehensive’*
10 times: Baidu mentioned the word ‘Ecosystem’
22 times: ICBC mentioned the word ‘Internet’ or ‘FinTech’*
Note*: Strategy product-related context only, excluding accounting/legal/technical terms
Although the FinTech sector had seen significant growth in the past few years, the combined market share of today is
still a fraction of China’s colossal financial system, and the regulators are still generally pro-growth – but we believe the
final form of the FinTech ecosystem will likely be very different from the current form we observe today. We believe it’s
likely the government, through many forms including regulatory bodies, will continue to play a big role in the future. It
is crucial for us to watch the regulatory direction from here.
Exhibit 8: Total payment value (TPV) of third-party
payment firms is 13% of that of bank card transactions.
Third-party payment TPV as % of bank card in China
Exhibit 9: Internet lending grew exponentially since
2013, but small compared to the total social financing.
Internet lending as % of total social financing in China
Source: PBOC, WIND, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research Source: PBOC, WIND, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
10
25
49
99
2013 2014 2015 2016
TPV of 3rd-party payment companies as % of bank
card transactions in China (Rmb trn)
TPV of 3rd-
party payment
companies
As % of
TPV of
bank card
2.4%
5.5%
7.4%
13.4%
CAGR =
115%
30
107
497
1,078
2013 2014 2015 2016
Internet lending as % of total social financing* by loan
balance outstanding (Rmb bn)
Loan balance of
internet lending
CAGR =
230%
*Total social financing excluding bonds and equities
As % of
TSF
0.03%
0.10%
0.42% 0.79%
Future of Finance: The Rise of China FinTech
August 7, 2017
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 14
Key shaping trends #2: Regulation
Regulation plays a vital role in determining the future evolution. Over the years, the
FinTech regulatory environment has shifted from the initial free hand to promote
growth, to a more balanced approach. These regulatory trends will be detailed in
each of our Rise of China FinTech reports. We expect it to continue to evolve,
especially with private capital’s uncharacteristically high participation in
infrastructure build-out, and the nascent nature of the industry.
The regulatory environment has supported innovation
, especially in 2013-2015. Due to
historical protection and strict regulation, traditional financial institutions (especially banks)
have mainly served state-owned enterprises (SOEs), and are moving slowly with a
continuing structural mismatch between supply and demand. This generates a relatively
uncompetitive environment, with consumers and small businesses’ financial needs largely
underpenetrated. Higher regulatory costs and lack of infrastructure (such as personal credit
scoring systems) also hindered banks from entering the space. As China’s economy enters
the ‘new normal’, a largely investment-and-SOE-led economy is no longer sustainable, and
consumer spending and SME growth are becoming more pivotal drivers. With that macro
backdrop, the government and regulators have explicitly expressed support for financial
innovation and internet finance since 2013, and imposed far less regulatory constraints vs
banks until recently.
Exhibit 10: The regulatory environment has in general supported innovation, but started to get more sophisticated in
risk management.
Quotes on internet finance from the Report on the Work of the Government by Premier Li Keqiang
Source: State Council of the PRC, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
The tightening trend of the regulatory environment will increase regulatory costs,
although overall the regulatory environment is still supportive. Initially free from regulatory
oversights, the FinTech industry boomed and with the rapid growth came fraud and
dangerous funding models, especially in the internet lending space. As risks events started
to occur, Chinese regulators started to put more emphasis on market order, healthy
development, and risk management. In a series of announcements from Jun 2015 to Oct
"
...
encourage
the
healthy development
of e-commerce, industrial networks, and
Internet banking, and to guide Internet-based companies to increase their presence in the
international market...
...channel
great energy
into developing
inclusive finance
...
"
2015
"
...be
fully alert
to the
buildup of risks
, including risks related to non-performing
assets, bond defaults, shadow banking, and Internet finance....
...
encourage large and medium commercial banks
to establish inclusive finance
departments...
"
2017
"
...work to see that Internet finance
develops in line with regulations
...
...make a
major push
to develop inclusive and green finance...
"
2016
Future of Finance: The Rise of China FinTech
August 7, 2017
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 15
2016, the government laid out a comprehensive overarching framework, defining who and
how they will regulate each business verticals within the ‘internet finance’ industry, putting
more checks and balances on FinTech companies’ business practices, especially on
compliance, funding models, as well as consumer protection. On May 15, 2017, the central
bank introduced a new FinTech committee, who will be responsible for coordinating
between different financial regulators and industry participants. Regulators are constantly
reviewing and revising the existing rules, and in some cases creating opportunities for
incumbents. For instance, a recent CBRC regulation update suspended internet lending
companies access to the student loan market, but instead encouraged banks to provide
such services, a market that banks were previously not allowed to enter.
The unique closed-loop ecosystems of the big players also call for more sophisticated
regulatory oversight and greater efforts in ensuring transparency. Indeed, it is already
possible for the few big players to create credit within their closed ecosystem, and
completely outside of the central banks’ system. Thus, there is an increasing need for
monitoring. An important milestone will be the establishment of the centralized clearing
house for all third-party payments, Wanglian, in March 2017 – which is still in test-run stage
and expected to clear all third-party payments in the long run. This will wend the current
arrangements where most third-party players connect to each bank directly and effectively
circumvent regulator oversights on transaction natures and fund flows.
We do not believe these measures are targeted to suppress innovation, but we do believe
this would add speed bumps and induce significant business model changes for some
players. We believe that the regulatory costs for FinTech companies will increase
significantly over the next few years, thereby reducing return on capital to a more
normalized level. Part of the lower return on capital should be compensated by the
increase of the revenue pool. Scale will become more important in that context - and we
might see waves of consolidations, especially within the payment and lending space.
Exhibit 11: Regulators have laid out and keep updating their framework for regulating the “internet finance” industry
Overview of the regulations on internet finance in China
Source: PBOC, CBRC, CIRC, CSRC, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
PBOC: People's Bank of China
CBRC: China Banking Regulatory Commission CIRC: China Insurance Regulatory Commission CSRC: China Securities Regulatory Commission
Guidance on promoting healthy development of Internet Finance (Jul 2015)
Definition of scope of coverage: Financial institutions and internet companies, providing capital intermediation, payment, and investment services, and
related-information intermediary services.
Government approach: Promote building of basic infrastructures by industry participants, encourage technology adoption and innovation, broaden financing
Regulation: Aug 16
Key approaches:
1. Emphasis on
platform function;
2. Requirement to use
banks as custodian of
funds;
3. Cap loan size;
4. 13 non-compliant
activities.
Regulation: Aug 15
Key approaches:
1. Brought into CSRC
supervision;
2. Define authorized
participants and
licensing criteria.
Regulation: Oct 16
Key approaches:
1. Customer protection
by centralized custody
of clients' reserve;
2. Risk management
by establishing
Wanglian, a centralized
clearing house for
third-party payment.
Regulation: Mar 16
Key approaches:
1. Broaden financing
channel;
2. Encourage the use
of interbank market for
liquidity;
3. Encourage asset
securitization.
Regulation: July 15
Key approaches:
1. Relax geographic
restrictions for certain
products;
2. Define applicable
products;
3. Define non-
compliant activities and
actions.
Regulation: Jul 16
Key approaches:
1. Separation of funds
with payment activities;
2. Increase scrutiny on
risk and return
disclosure.
Internet lending Crowdfunding Internet payment
Online consumer
finance
Online insurance
Online mutual fund
distribution
CBRC CSRC PBOC CBRC CIRC CSRC
Establishment of
FinTech Committee
by PBOC (May 2017) -to strengthen FinTech research planning and to act as an
overall coordinator
.
RegTech
: active adoption of big data, AI, cloud computing and other technology to improve cross-industry/ cross-market risk identification / prevention.
Future of Finance: The Rise of China FinTech
August 7, 2017
Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research 16
Private capital now has a seat at the table, and technology is the key enabler
Although the regulatory shifts might introduce changes to some disruptors’ business
models, we note that private capital has uncharacteristically high participation in the
FinTech infrastructure ownership, and it will therefore likely have a bigger voice in
influencing future policy directions. Most of China’s existing basic infrastructures (bridges
and roads/electricity grids), regardless of industries, were built and owned by SOEs or
government agencies, and hence eventually the government. But we point out that a few
big players in the FinTech industry have not only built a sizeable user base for the next
generation of financial infrastructure, but also started to own them. Indeed, some
innovators have come a long way making themselves more indispensable with a real
technological advantage. We believe this could have implications on future industry
structure/directions, technological standards as well as customer ownerships.
One of these early examples is Wanglian, China’s newly established centralized clearing
network for all third-party payments. The largest shareholders besides the Central Bank
PBOC and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) are Ant Financial (9.61%)
and Tencent (9.61%). This is in stark contrast with China’s only card network UnionPay,
which was built and still owned by PBOC and SOE Banks, and hence eventually the
government.
Private participation in infrastructure of this scale is almost unprecedented in other
industries in China. We think this is because – in order to regulate in the digital age – the
regulators need to work closely with disruptors (who are often private companies instead
of SOEs), as that is where the technology know-how and processing power lies.
We emphasize that regulating the FinTech industry is a dynamic balancing act and we
might see regulations constantly evolving through trial and error. Owing to the nascent
nature of the business model and the public-private collaboration, it would be difficult to
surmise the policy directions. Thus, we believe it is important to track the development of
how a few early initiatives evolves (such as the payment clearing house), as it could have
deep implications for regulating the rest of the FinTech industry.
Exhibit 12: Private companies are playing a bigger role in China’s FinTech infrastructure for the first time.
Alipay and Tenpay are the largest shareholders of China’s only clearing house for all online payments, besides PBOC and SAFE.
This compares to China’s only card network, UnionPay, built and owned by PBOC and SOE banks. Data as of 2017.
Source: Company data, Sina, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
China UnionPay Wanglian (sole clearing house for all online payment)
152 45
2.93 2
25% by 6 main shareholders:
China Banknote Printing and Minting (4.86%)
China Construction Bank (4.78%) China National Clearing Center (12%)
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (3.84%) Wutongshu Investment Platform (10%)
Agricultural Bank of China (3.84%) Shanghai Clearing House (3%)
Bank of China (3.84%) Shanghai Gold Exchange (3%)
Bank of Communications (3.84%)
China Banknote Printing and Minting (3%)
National Association of Financial Market Institutional
Investors (3%)
Joint-stock commercial banks such as: 63% by 38 non-bank payment companies such as:
China Merchants Bank, Shanghai Pudong Development
Bank, Postal Saving Bank of China, China CITIC Bank,
China Guangfa Bank, Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank,
Hua Xia Bank, Industrial Bank, Minsheng Bank, etc.
Alipay (9.61%)
Tenpay (9.61%)
JD Pay (4.71%)
35 other payment companies (<3% each)
Municipal commercial banks, credit cooperatives and non-
bank institutions
Payment and Clearing Association of China (3%,
representing other small & medium-sized payment
companies)
34% by 6 national institutions, including affiliates of
PBOC and State Administration of Foreign Exchange
Number of shareholders
Capital (Rmb bn)
Main shareholders
Future of Finance: The Rise of China FinTech
剩余71页未读,继续阅读
探索者我有我路向
- 粉丝: 326
- 资源: 2100
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 展开
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
最新资源
- JDK 17 Linux版本压缩包解压与安装指南
- C++/Qt飞行模拟器教员控制台系统源码发布
- TensorFlow深度学习实践:CNN在MNIST数据集上的应用
- 鸿蒙驱动HCIA资料整理-培训教材与开发者指南
- 凯撒Java版SaaS OA协同办公软件v2.0特性解析
- AutoCAD二次开发中文指南下载 - C#编程深入解析
- C语言冒泡排序算法实现详解
- Pointofix截屏:轻松实现高效截图体验
- Matlab实现SVM数据分类与预测教程
- 基于JSP+SQL的网站流量统计管理系统设计与实现
- C语言实现删除字符中重复项的方法与技巧
- e-sqlcipher.dll动态链接库的作用与应用
- 浙江工业大学自考网站开发与继续教育官网模板设计
- STM32 103C8T6 OLED 显示程序实现指南
- 高效压缩技术:删除重复字符压缩包
- JSP+SQL智能交通管理系统:违章处理与交通效率提升
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功