4122 M.Nadimi-Shahraki et al.
1 3
In summary, most prior surveys lack a critical analysis
of the WOA algorithm, its weaknesses and behaviors, an
adapted methodology for extracting the eligible papers, and
an introduction to effective techniques and algorithms to
develop more successful variants. In addition, many WOA
variants have been introduced in the last five years; therefore,
an updated systematic review of this algorithm is needed.
Hence, the scope of this systematic review is considered
from 2019. This study analyzes the WOA algorithm criti-
cally to highlight its weakness and behaviors. The reported
results of this analysis can provide informative knowledge
for further developing the WOA by knowing its strengths
and weaknesses. Then, an adapted methodology is intro-
duced to extract eligible papers of WOA variants. The eli-
gible papers are reviewed in two main categories, improved
and hybrid WOA variants. The common techniques used
in improved WOA and the effective algorithms applied in
hybrid WOA are highlighted and explained, which can guide
future developments for metaheuristic algorithms.
5 The Adapted Methodology
This section introduces an adapted methodology for our
systematic review to filter the number of related documents
efficiently since Fig.2 alerts usto numerous developments
in WOA. Thus, as shown in Fig.8, we adapted the PRISMA
methodology [71] to select a reasonable number of the most
reputable papers for full-text reading. The introduced meth-
odology consists of three main stages as follows.
5.1 Identification Stage
In this stage, related keywords and alternative synonyms
are defined as target search problems to search and extract
documents from different databases. The defined keywords
include “WOA”, “whale algorithm”, “whale optimization”,
“whale optimiser”, “whale optimizer”, “whale optimiza-
tion algorithm”, and “whale optimisation algorithm”.
Then, the defined keywords were searched in the Google
Scholar database restricted from 2019 to the end of March
2023, and 2983 documents were identified in this stage.
5.2 Evaluation Stage
This stage uses three screening steps to evaluate the identi-
fied documents and select eligible papers. In the screening
steps, the Rayyan tool [67] is used for citation sharing and
allowing comparison of decisions to include or exclude.
Duplicate papers and those papers published by non-aca-
demic journals were removedinthe first screening. There
were 39 duplicated papers extracted from theScopus and
WOS databases. The remaining 2944 papers were checked
for non-academic and disreputable journalsto remove, and
as shown in Fig.9, 1751 papers published by different
journals were selected for the next screening.
In the second screening, the title and abstract of
candidate papers were investigated, 1096 papers were
thenexcluded respecting the study scope, and 655 papers
remained. The third screening has two steps; first, the full
text of the candidate papers is read to select eligible papers
using the inclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria consid-
ered for this study are listed as follows.
– C
1
: Papers published from 2019 to the end of March
2023.
– C
2
: Papers written in theEnglish language.
– C
3
: Non-conference papers and Non-short communica-
tions.
– C
4
: Papers published in reputable journals.
– C
5
: Papers focused on WOA as the main topic.
– C
6
: Papers focused on developing WOA using improve-
ment or hybridizing approaches.
Although some of these criteria were checked to reduce
the number of candidate papers in the previous stage, they
were carefully rechecked in this step by reading their full
texts. This step selected 111 eligible papers and then
increased the countto 116 by studying their references in
the second step of the third screening to find more eligible
papers based on inclusion criteria.
5.3 Reporting stage
In this stage, the116 eligible papers collected from Rayyan
as the final set are first classified by six main and other pub-
lishers. Then, they are reviewed for the qualitative synthesis
59%
15%
3%
2%
21%
Journal article (1751)
Conference paper (441)
Book & Book chapter (81) Dissertation (57)
Disreputable document (614)
Fig. 8 The percentage of different WOA documents from 2019 to the
end of March 2023