equations have extra terms because quarks q have mass
m
q
≠ 0. When the trace anomaly [56–59] (with the vacuum
expectation value subtracted)
11
θ
μ
μ
¼
βðα
s
Þ
4α
s
G
A
μν
G
Aμν
þð1 þγ
m
ðα
s
ÞÞ
X
q
m
q
¯
qq
− fVEVg
ð40Þ
and the CS equation
μ
∂
∂μ
þβðα
s
Þ
∂
∂α
s
− γ
m
ðα
s
Þ
X
q
m
q
∂
∂m
q
þγ
O
ðα
s
Þ
× hvacjOð0Þjvaci¼0 ð41Þ
are compared, we find
μ
∂
∂μ
þ γ
O
ðα
s
Þ
hvacjOð0Þjvaci¼i lim
q→0
Z
d
4
xe
iq·x
T
vac
X
q
m
q
¯
qqðxÞ − θ
μ
μ
ðxÞ
Oð0Þ
vac
subtr
: ð42Þ
If heavy quarks have been decoupled, and the limit m
q
→ 0 is taken for the light quarks q ¼ u, d, s as the IR fixed point is
approached, dilaton pole terms from both θ
μ
μ
and
P
q
m
q
¯
qq may survive the limit [13–15]:
μ
∂
∂μ
þ γ
O
ðα
s
Þ
hvacjOð0Þjvaci → f
σ
hσjOð0Þjvaci
1 − ð 3 − γ
m
ðα
sIR
ÞÞðf
π
=f
σ
Þ
2
m
2
K
þ
1
2
m
2
π
m
2
σ
: ð43Þ
III. CRAWLING TC: HIDDEN
ELECTROWEAK-SCALE SYMMETRY
TC is based on the idea [76–78] that electroweak
symmetry “breaking” is the dynamical effect of a gauge
theory which resembles QCD but whose coupling becomes
strong at scales of a few TeV. The trigger for this effect
is a techniquark condensate h
¯
ψψi
vac
≠ 0. The resulting
technipions become the longitudinal components of the
W
and Z
0
bosons, while the masses and couplings of the
other technihadrons are estimated by scaling up QCD
quantities, where the electroweak scale v ≃ 246 GeV plays
the role of the pion decay constant f
π
≃ 93 MeV.
An attractive feature of TC is that the hierarchy problem
is avoided: the mechanism for mass generation does not
rely on elementary Higgs-like scalars. Instead, masses are
generated dynamically through dimensional transmutation
[67], as in QCD.
When TC was invented, the Particle Data Group (PDG)
tables did not include QCD scalar J
PC
¼ 0
þþ
resonances
below ≈1 GeV,
12
so for many years, it was thought, by
analogy with QCD, that TC scalar particles would not be
seen below the TeV scale.
There is now strong evidence for a light, broad 0
þþ
resonance f
0
ð500Þ in the QCD meson spectrum with mass
m
f
0
≃ 441 MeV [79–81] (evidence which seems to have
been mostly overlooked in the TC literature), and also for a
narrow Higgs boson h at m
h
≃ 125 GeV [82,83]. Given
these facts, can h be the TC version of the f
0
ð500Þ? At first
sight, the answer to this question is negative. An applica-
tion of the scaling rules mentioned above requires the TC
analogue f
0T
of f
0
to have a large mass [84]
m
f
0T
≈ ðv=f
π
Þm
f
0
¼ OðTeVÞ; ð44Þ
also, they seem to imply an OðTeVÞ width except for the
fact that the f
0
ð500Þ has plenty of phase space for its decay
into two pions, whereas there are no technipions for f
0T
to
decay into and (for a mass of 125 GeV) no phase space for
it to decay into W
þ
W
−
or Z
0
Z
0
. But it is evident that this
estimate for the mass is much too large.
A convincing explanation for why the observed mass
m
h
≃ 125 MeV is so small relative to TeV scales is hard to
find. That is a key problem shared by all theories of
dynamical Higgs mass generation, including TC and its
extensions. The most promising strategy is to suppose that
the Higgs is a pseudo-NG (pNG) boson of a hidden
symmetry. Then the mass acquired by the pNG boson
due to explicit symmetry breaking is protected by the
underlying symmetry [85,86]. A light Higgs mass can arise
if explicit symmetry breaking is due to physics at the
electroweak scale and hence small relative to the scale of
dynamical symmetry breaking.
In composite Higgs models [87–91], where the hidden
symmetry is internal, this mechanism is well understood:
the Higgs boson and all would-be NG bosons are placed in
the same multiplet of an extended group such as SOð5Þ
[92–94]. For a recent review of these models, see chapter III
of Ref. [95].
12
The ϵð700Þ was excluded from the PDG tables in 1974. Its
successor f
0
ð500Þ was first mentioned in 1996, but became a
well-defined resonance only in the 2008 tables.
11
For consistency, the γ
m
terms in Eqs. (40) and (41) must
have opposite signs (unlike Ref. [14] where conventions
were changed during review). Here we choose the definition
γ
m
¼ −μ∂ ln m
q
=∂μ [75]. Then
¯
qq has dynamical dimension
3 − γ
m
ðα
sIR
Þ at a QCD fixed point α
sIR
, and similarly for
¯
ψψ in
crawling TC, where the notation becomes γ
m
ðαÞ and α
IR
.
CRAWLING TECHNICOLOR PHYS. REV. D 100, 095007 (2019)
095007-9