没有合适的资源?快使用搜索试试~ 我知道了~
首页Science 杂志综述长文——Machine learning机器学习发展趋势和前景
资源详情
资源评论
资源推荐
Despite practical challe nges, we are hopeful that
informeddiscussionsamongpolicy-makersandthe
public about data and the capabilities of machine
learning, will lead to insightful designs of programs
and policies that can balance the goals of protecting
privacy and ensuring fairness with those of reaping
the benefits to scientific research and to individual
and public health. Our commitments to privacy and
fairness are evergreen, but our policy choices must
adapt to advance them, and support new tech-
niques for deepening our knowledge.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
1. M. De Choudhury, S. Counts, E. Horvitz, A. Hoff, in Proceedings
of International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media
[Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence
(AAAI), Palo Alto, CA, 2014].
2. J. S. Brownstein, C. C. Freifeld, L. C. Madoff, N. Engl. J. Med.
360, 2153–2155 (2009).
3. G. Eysenbach, J. Med. Internet Res. 11, e11 (2009).
4. D. A. Broniatowski, M. J. Paul, M. Dredze, PLOS ONE 8, e83672
(2013).
5. A. Sadilek, H. Kautz, V. Silenzio, in Proceedings of the
Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
(AAAI, Palo Alto, CA, 2012).
6. M. De Choudhury, S. Counts, E. Horvitz, in Proceedings of the
SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
(Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2013),
pp. 3267–3276.
7. R. W. White, R. Harpaz, N. H. Shah, W. DuMouchel, E. Horvitz,
Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 96, 239–246 (2014).
8. Samaritans Radar; www.samaritans.org/how-we-can-help-you/
supporting-someone-online/samaritans-radar.
9. Shut down Samaritans Radar; http://bit.ly/Samaritans-after.
10. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), 29
Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.), 1630.2 (g) (2013).
11. EEOC, 29 CFR 1635.3 (c) (2013).
12. M. A. Rothstein, J. Law Med. Ethics 36, 837–840 (2008).
13. Executive Office of the President, Big Data: Seizing
Opportunities, Preserving Values (White House, Washington,
DC, 2014); http://1.usa.gov/1TSOhiG.
14. Letter from Maneesha Mithal, FTC, to Reed Freeman, Morrison,
& Foerster LLP, Counsel for Netflix, 2 [closing letter] (2010);
http://1.usa.gov/1GCFyXR.
15. In re Facebook, Complaint, FTC File No. 092 3184 (2012).
16. FTC Staff Report, Mobile Privacy Disclosures: Building Trust Through
Transparency (FTC,Washington,DC,2013);http://1.usa.gov/1eNz8zr.
17. FTC, Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change:
Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers (FTC,
Washington, DC, 2012).
18. Directive 95/46/ec of the European Parliament and of The
Council of Europe, 24 October 1995.
19. L. Sweeney, Online ads roll the dice [blog]; http://1.usa.gov/
1KgEcYg.
20. FTC, “Big data: A tool for inclusion or exclusion?” (workshop,
FTC, Washington, DC, 2014); http://1.usa.gov/1SR65cv
21. FTC, Data Brokers: A Call for Transparency and Accountability
(FTC, Washington, DC, 2014); http://1.usa.gov/1GCFoj5.
22. J. Podesta, “Big data and privacy: 1 year out” [blog]; http://bit.
ly/WHsePrivacy.
23. White House Council of Economic Advisers, Big Data and
Differential Pricing (White House, Washington, DC, 2015).
24. Executive Office of the President, Big Data and Differential Processing
(White House, Washington, DC, 2015); http://1.usa.gov/1eNy7qR.
25. Executive Office of the President, Big Data: Seizing
Opportunities, Preserving Values (White House, Washington,
DC, 2014); http://1.usa.gov/1TSOhiG.
26. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology
(PCAST), Big Data and Privacy: A Technological Perspective
(White House, Washington, DC, 2014); http://1.usa.gov/1C5ewNv.
27. European Commission, Proposal for a Regulation of the European
Parliament and of the Council on the Protection of Individuals
with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free
movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation),
COM(2012) 11 final (2012); http://bit.ly/1Lu5POv.
28. M. Schrems v. Facebook Ireland Limited, §J. Unlawful data
transmission to the U.S.A. (“PRISM”), ¶166 and 167 (2013);
www.europe-v-facebook.org/sk/sk_en.pdf.
10.1126/science.aac4520
REVIEW
Machine learning: Trends,
persp ectives, and prospects
M. I. Jordan
1
* and T. M. Mitchell
2
*
Machine learning addresses the question of how to build computers that improve
automatically through experience. It is one of today’s most rapidly growing technical fields,
lying at the intersection of computer science and statistics, and at the core of artificial
intelligence and data science. Recent progress in machine learning has been driven both by
the development of new learning algorithms and theory and by the ongoing explosion in the
availability of online data and low-cost computation. The adoption of data-intensive
machine-learning methods can be found throughout science, technology and commerce,
leading to more evidence-based decision-making across many walks of life, including
health care, manufacturing, education, financial modeling, policing, and marketing.
M
achine learning is a discipline focused
on two interrelated questions: How can
one construct computer systems that auto-
matically improve through experience?
and What are the fundamental statistical-
computational-information-theoretic laws that
govern all learning systems, including computers,
humans, and organizations? The study of machine
learning is important both for addressing these
fundamental scientific and engineering ques-
tions and for the highly practical computer soft-
wareithasproducedandfieldedacrossmany
applications.
Machine learning has progressed dramati-
cally over the past two decades, from laboratory
curiosity to a practical technology in widespread
commercial use. Within artificial intelligence (AI),
machine learning has emerged as the method
of choice for developing practical software for
computer vision, speech recognition, natural lan-
gu a ge processing, robot control, and other ap-
plications. Many developers of AI systems now
recognize that, for many applications, it can be
far easier to train a system by showing it exam-
ples of desired input-output behavior than to
program it manually by anticipating the desired
response for all possible inputs. The effect of ma-
chine learning has also been felt broadly across
co mputer science and across a range of indus-
tries concerned with data-intensive issues, such
as consumer services, the diagnosis of faults in
complex systems, and the control of logistics
chains. There has been a similarly broad range of
effects across empirical sciences, from biology to
cosmology to social science, as machine-learning
methods have been developed to analyze high-
throughput experimental data in novel ways. See
Fig. 1 for a depiction of some recent areas of ap-
plication of machine learning.
A learning problem can be defined as the
problem of improving some measure of perform-
an c e when executing some task, through some
type of training experience. For example, in learn-
ing to detect credit-card fraud, the task is to as-
sign a label of “fraud” or “not fraud” to any given
credit-card transaction. The performance metric
to be improved might be the accuracy of this
fraud classifier , and the training experience might
consist of a collection of historical credit-card
transactions, each labeled in retrospect as fraud-
ulent or not. Alternatively, one might define a
different performance metric that assigns a higher
penalty when “fraud” is labeled “not fraud” than
when “not fraud” is incorrectly labeled “fraud.”
One mig ht also def in e a di f ferent type of training
experience—for example, by including unlab-
eled credit-card transactions along with labeled
examples.
A diverse array of machine-learning algorithms
ha s been developed to cover the wide variety of
data and problem types exhibited across differ-
ent machine-learning problems (1, 2). Conceptual-
ly, machine-learning algorithms can be viewed as
searching through a large space of candidate
programs, guided by training experience, to find
a program that optimizes the performance metric.
Machine-learning algorithms vary greatly, in part
by the way in which they represent candidate
programs (e.g., decision trees, mathematical func-
tions, and general programming languages) and in
partbythewayinwhichtheysearchthroughthis
space of programs (e.g., optimization algorithm s
with well-understood convergence guarantees
and evolutionary search methods that evaluate
successivegenerationsofrandomlymutatedpro-
gr a ms). Here, we focus on approaches that have
been particularly successful to date.
Many algorithms focus on function approxi-
mation problems, where the task is embodied
in a function (e.g., given an input transaction, out-
put a “fraud” or “not fraud” label), and the learn-
ing problem is to improve the accuracy of that
function, with experience consisting of a sample
of known input-output pai rs of the fun ction . In
some cases, the function is represented explicit-
ly as a parameterized functional form; in other
cases, the function is implicit and obtained via a
search process, a factorization, an optimization
SCIENCE sciencemag.org 17 JULY 20 15 • VOL 349 ISSUE 6245 255
1
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer
Sciences, Department of Statistics, University of California,
Berkeley, CA, USA.
2
Machine Learning Department, Carnegie
Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
*Corresponding author. E-mail: jordan@cs.berkeley.edu (M.I.J.);
tom.mitchell@cs.cmu.edu (T.M.M.)
on January 11, 2018 http://science.sciencemag.org/Downloaded from
zhuf14
- 粉丝: 16
- 资源: 57
上传资源 快速赚钱
- 我的内容管理 收起
- 我的资源 快来上传第一个资源
- 我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
- 我的积分 登录查看自己的积分
- 我的C币 登录后查看C币余额
- 我的收藏
- 我的下载
- 下载帮助
会员权益专享
最新资源
- ExcelVBA中的Range和Cells用法说明.pdf
- 基于单片机的电梯控制模型设计.doc
- 主成分分析和因子分析.pptx
- 共享笔记服务系统论文.doc
- 基于数据治理体系的数据中台实践分享.pptx
- 变压器的铭牌和额定值.pptx
- 计算机网络课程设计报告--用winsock设计Ping应用程序.doc
- 高电压技术课件:第03章 液体和固体介质的电气特性.pdf
- Oracle商务智能精华介绍.pptx
- 基于单片机的输液滴速控制系统设计文档.doc
- dw考试题 5套.pdf
- 学生档案管理系统详细设计说明书.doc
- 操作系统PPT课件.pptx
- 智慧路边停车管理系统方案.pptx
- 【企业内控系列】企业内部控制之人力资源管理控制(17页).doc
- 温度传感器分类与特点.pptx
资源上传下载、课程学习等过程中有任何疑问或建议,欢迎提出宝贵意见哦~我们会及时处理!
点击此处反馈
安全验证
文档复制为VIP权益,开通VIP直接复制
信息提交成功
评论2