4 | P a g e
About Academic Phrasebank
Theoretical Influences
The Academic Phrasebank largely draws on an approach to analysing academic texts originally
pioneered by John Swales in the 1980s. Utilising a genre analysis approach to identify rhetorical
patterns in the introductions to research articles, Swales defined a ‘move’ as a section of text that
serves a specific communicative function (Swales, 1981,1990). This unit of rhetorical analysis is used
as one of the main organising sub-categories of the Academic Phrasebank. Swales not only identified
commonly-used moves in article introductions, but he was interested in showing the kind of
language which was used to achieve the communicative purpose of each move. Much of this
language was phraseological in nature.
The resource also draws upon psycholinguistic insights into how language is learnt and produced. It
is now accepted that much of the language we use is phraseological in nature; that it is acquired,
stored and retrieved as pre-formulated constructions (Bolinger, 1976; Pawley and Syder, 1983).
These insights began to be supported empirically as computer technology permitted the
identification of recurrent phraseological patterns in very large corpora of spoken and written
English using specialised software (e.g. Sinclair, 1991). Phrasebank recognises that there is an
important phraseological dimension to academic language and attempts to make examples of this
explicit.
Sources of the phrases
The vast majority of phrases in this resource have been taken from authentic academic sources. The
original corpus from which the phrases were ‘harvested’ consisted of 100 postgraduate dissertations
completed at the University of Manchester. However, phrases from academic articles drawn from a
broad spectrum of disciples have also been, and continue to be, incorporated. In most cases, the
phrases have been simplified and where necessary they have been ‘sifted’ from their particularised
academic content. Where content words have been included for exemplificatory purposes, these are
substitutions of the original words. In selecting a phrase for inclusion into the Academic Phrasebank,
the following questions are asked:
• does it serve a useful communicative purpose in academic text?
• does it contain collocational and/or formulaic elements?
• are the content words (nouns, verbs, adjectives) generic in nature?
• does the combination ‘sound natural' to a native speaker or writer of English?
When is it acceptable to reuse phrases in academic writing?
In a recent study (Davis and Morley, 2013), 45 academics from two British universities were
surveyed to determine whether reusing phrases was a legitimate activity for academic writers, and if
so, what kind of phrases could be reused. From the survey and later from in-depth interviews, the
following characteristics for acceptability emerged. A reused phrase:
• should not have a unique or original construction;
• should not express a clear point of view of another writer;
• depending on the phrase, may be up to nine words in length; beyond this 'acceptability'
declines;
• may contain up to four generic content words (nouns, verbs or adjectives which are not
bound to a specific disciplinary domain).
我的内容管理
收起
我的收益 登录查看自己的收益
我的积分
登录查看自己的积分
我的C币
登录后查看C币余额
我的收藏 
我的下载 
下载帮助 
评论0