鲁棒滑模预测控制：PMSM驱动器的电流控制与扰动补偿

43 浏览量更新于2024-08-26 收藏 2.62MB PDF 举报

本文针对电动驱动系统中永久磁同步电机(PMSM)的电流控制问题，着重探讨了在模型不确定性以及外界干扰存在的情况下，如何实现快速响应和强健性的控制策略。研究者Xudong Liu、Chenghui Zhang、Ke Li 和 Qi Zhang 来自山东大学控制科学与工程学院，他们在2016年5月13日首次提交了这篇论文，并在2017年7月2日进行了修订，最终于8月27日接受，于同年9月7日在线发表。论文的核心贡献是提出了一种结合广义预测控制（Generalized Predictive Control, GPC）和滑模扰动补偿方法的鲁棒电流控制策略。GPC理论通常基于连续时间模型，该方法在设计时并未考虑扰动因素，这使得其在数字控制器中实现起来较为简便。然而，实际应用中，电机驱动系统经常面临如负载变化、电机参数漂移等不确定性，这些都可能导致控制系统性能下降。为了克服这些问题，论文提出了一种改进的GPC，它能够在预测控制过程中考虑到这些扰动。通过引入滑模控制技术，能够有效地抑制扰动对系统的影响，提高控制系统的鲁棒性。滑模控制利用其固有的“无穷维”结构，能够实现对快速变化的动态环境有很好的适应性，确保在存在外部扰动时仍能保持系统稳定和高精度的电流控制。在实施这一方法时，首先对电机模型进行建模，然后利用GPC的优化算法预测未来状态，制定出最优电流指令。在执行过程中，通过实时监测并补偿由扰动引起的误差，保持电流跟踪目标值。这种方法不仅提升了控制系统的响应速度，也显著增强了其抵抗外部干扰的能力，从而满足了电动驱动系统对于高性能和稳定性的要求。这篇研究论文提供了一个实用且具有理论基础的解决方案，对于提升PMSM在电动驱动中的控制性能，尤其是在复杂工况下的应用具有重要意义。未来的研究可能继续探索如何进一步优化滑模补偿算法，以减少计算负担，或者将此方法推广到更广泛的电机类型中。

disturbance and adapting parameter variations and model un-

certainties. Thus a robust and adaptive current controller based on

generalized predictive control with sliding mode disturbance

compensation is proposed in this paper.

3.1. The design of predictive current controller

Inspired by the generalized predictive control theory in [27],

the design of current controller for ideal system is presented as

follows.

According to (4), neglecting the disturbance part, the nominal

model can be expressed as



=()+()

=()=()

()

xfxgxu

yhxgxx

where

=[ ]uuu

111

Let

be the reference current, and

]yii

. First of all,

the cost function is deﬁned as

∫

τττττ

(+)−

(+))(

(+)−

(+))

()

J ytytytytd

where T is the predictive horizon,

)

and

)

represent

the predictive current and the predictive reference current,

respectively.

According to the nominal PMSM system (5), each of the output

current has the same relative degree

= 1

. The total relative de-

gree of the system is equal to the systems order. Consequently,

there is no zero dynamics. The output current is measurable. In

addition, the current is taken as the smooth variable, so it satisﬁes

continuously differentiable with respect to the time. Therefore,

four assumptions given in [27] can be satisﬁed. In order to alleviate

the computation burden, the control order

is chosen, thus

the control input

τ(+

)

in the moving time frame is constant.

Repeated differentiation up to

ρ(+

)

th of the output

(

)

with

respect to time

()= ()



()= ()+ ()

()

yt Lhx

yt Lhx Lhxu

where

()= ()=[ ]Lhx hx i i

fdq

()= ()= (

)

∂( ( ))

∂

Lhx f x f x

⎡

⎣

⎢

⎤

⎦

⎥

()=

∂( ( ))

∂

()=Lhx

Because

= 1

and

, at least

+=r 1

terms should be

maintained in the truncated Taylor's expansion of

)

, i.e.

ττ

(+)=

()+



() =

()

yt yt y tm,1,2.

mmm

where m is deﬁned as an element index of multidimensional

output

(

)

, with

()=[

()

()] =[ ]yt y t y t i i

Then

⎡

⎣

⎢

⎤

⎦

⎥

⎡

⎣

⎢

⎤

⎦

⎥

(+)=

()



()

10 0

010

Let

⎡

⎣

⎢

⎤

⎦

⎥

⎡

⎣

⎢

⎤

⎦

⎥

Γτ

()=

()



()

10 0

010

It follows that

τΓτ

(+)= ()

()

yt Yt.

Similarly, the Taylor's expansion of the reference output current

τΓτ

(+)= ()

()

yt Yt,

where

()=[ ()



()]

tytyt

and



(

)

is the derivative of the re-

ference current.

Let

∫

ΓΓτΓττ

()= ()()Td

, and according to the Appendix A in

[27], the

(

)

ij,

th element in the matrix

()T

can be represented as

⎡

⎣

⎢

⎤

⎦

⎥

() =

( − )!( − )!( + − )

()

+−

ijij

11 1

, , 1, 2.

Then, allow for the truncation of

)

and

)

, the cost

function is approximatively equal to

()−

()]

()[

()−

()]

()

JYtYtTYtYt

To minimize the current tracking error in ﬁnite horizon, the

generalized predictive control law [18] for PMSM is derived as

=− ()( + ()−



)

()

−

uGxKMLhxy,

where

⎡

⎣

⎤

⎦

⎡

⎣

⎢

⎤

⎦

⎥

⎡

⎣

⎤

⎦

⎡

⎣

⎢

⎤

⎦

⎥

()=

() ()

()− ()

−

LhxLhx

hx y t

11 12

represent the column vector of

(

∈

is the ﬁrst

2 rows of the matrix

−

, and

⎡

⎣

⎢

⎤

⎦

⎥

ΓΓ

()=

¯¯

ρρ ρ

T ,

where

∈

ρρ

∈

. Then, K can be get as

⎡

⎣

⎢

⎤

⎦

⎥

The control laws

and

calculated in (15) are the reference

voltage in the PMSM control system based on GPC. It's worth

noting that the controller in (15) can solve the GPC control pro-

blem in general without any additional supporting means, and the

inﬂuence triggered by model uncertainties in the PMSM drive

system is disregarded. The current regulator performance may be

affected signiﬁcantly by the strong disturbance. For this reason, it's

necessary to consider the disturbance to strength the robustness

of the current controller.

3.2. The design of sliding mode disturbance compensation controller

To improve the robustness of the current controller and guar-

antee the fast current response, a sliding mode disturbance com-

pensation [32,33] combining the generalized predictive controller

is studied. The objective is to ﬁnd a control voltage u such that the

trajectories of the real motor system (4) coincide with the nominal

system (5). A kind of method is to add another control

=[ ]uuu

222

to the control

of the nominal system, i.e.

=+uu u

. The structure of the proposed current controller is

shown in Fig. 1. The sliding mode control

will be used to

eliminate the disturbance d, and the predictive control

provides

the preliminaries for the design of sliding mode controller.

is a

discontinuous control. According to (4) and (5) yields

() =−

()

gxu d,

where

eq2

is the equivalent control of

X. Liu et al. / ISA Transactions 71 (2017) 542–552544

剩余10页未读，继续阅读

weixin_38722944

粉丝: 3
资源: 889

鲁棒滑模预测控制：PMSM驱动器的电流控制与扰动补偿

基于滑模速度控制器的PMSM矢量控制系统matlab仿真模型

PMSM_SMC_变结构控制系统_扰动pmsm_鲁棒控制_滑模_pmsm参数_

PMSM_SMC_pmsm_pmsm滑模_matlabsimulink_基于滑模速度控制器的PMSM矢量控制_滑模控制_源码.z

基于滑模速度控器的pmsm矢量控制研究_董馨雨

基于滑模无感的pmsm控制csdn

指的是控制领域常用的一些控制方法，比如鲁棒控制，PID，滑模控制，模型预测控制，模糊控制，自抗扰控制等等

pmsm速度滑模控制

基于模型预测控制pmsm控制系统设计

广义Hamilton鲁棒控制器如何优化

滑模控制算法加上模型预测算法能构成鲁棒模型预测算法吗

最新资源