Eur. Phys. J. C (2015) 75 :498 Page 3 of 15 498
[GeV]
A/h
m
20 40 60 80 100 120
[pb]σ
−1
10
1
10
= 14 TeVs
htt
=1
t
A, gtt
(a)
[GeV]
A/h
T
p
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
a.u.
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
0.22
0.24
= 14 TeVs
= 20 GeV
A
m
= 100 GeV
A
m
= 20 GeV
h
m
= 100 GeV
h
m
(b)
Fig. 1 a Comparison of the leading-order cross section for t
¯
tA(solid
line)andt
¯
th (dashed line)in pp collisions at
√
s = 14 TeV as a func-
tion of Higgs boson mass. In both cases a value of g
t
= 1 is assumed.
b Comparison of the Higgs boson p
T
between t
¯
tA(black)andt
¯
th (red)
for two different values of the Higgs boson mass, 20 GeV (solid)and
100 GeV (dashed)
section at a mass of 20 GeV, and only about a factor of 2 larger
at a mass of 120 GeV [44]. This difference results from the
presence of the extra γ
5
factor in the interaction between
a CP-odd Higgs boson and the top quark, compared to the
case of a CP-even Higgs boson. Another consequence of
the different interaction is that a CP-odd Higgs boson has a
substantially harder p
T
spectrum compared to the CP-even
case, particularly at low mass, as illustrated in Fig. 1b. This
is a key feature exploited in this analysis, as discussed in
Sect. 4.
A large sample of t
¯
t+jets background events is gener-
ated including tree-level diagrams with up to two addi-
tional partons in the 5F scheme (i.e. including b- and c-
quarks). To avoid double-counting of partonic configura-
tions generated by both the matrix-element calculation and
the parton shower, a parton–jet matching scheme (“MLM
matching”) [45] is employed. The sample is normalised to
a cross section of 990 pb obtained using Top++ v2.0 [46]
at next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) in QCD, including
resummation of next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic (NNLL)
soft gluon terms [47–51], and using the MSTW 2008
NNLO [52,53]PDFset.Thet
¯
t+jets sample is generated
inclusively, but events are categorised depending on the
flavour content of additional particle jets in the event (i.e.
jets not originating from the decay of the t
¯
t system). Par-
ticle jets are reconstructed with the anti-k
t
[54–56] algo-
rithm with a radius parameter R = 0.4 and are required
to have p
T
> 15 GeV and |η| < 2.5. Events where at least
one such particle jet is matched within R < 0.4toab-
hadron with p
T
> 5 GeV not originating from a top quark
decay are generically labelled as t
¯
t +≥1b events. Similarly,
events where at least one such particle jet is matched within
R < 0.4toac-hadron with p
T
> 5 GeV not originating
from a W boson decay, and that are not labelled already as
t
¯
t +≥1b, are labelled as t
¯
t +≥1c events. Events labelled as
either t
¯
t +≥1b or t
¯
t+≥1c are generically referred to below
as t
¯
t+HF events, where HF stands for “heavy flavour”. We
do not apply dedicated corrections to the normalisation of
t
¯
t+HF events, since Run 1 searches at the LHC [57]showed
that the LO prediction from Madgraph5 using the same set-
tings as us is consistent with data within ∼20 %, and a larger
systematic uncertainty will be assumed in this study. As in
Ref. [57], a finer categorisation of t
¯
t+HF events is consid-
ered for the purpose of assigning systematic uncertainties
associated with the modelling of heavy-flavour production
in different topologies. In this way, a distinction is made
between events with only one extra heavy-flavour jet satisfy-
ing the above cuts (referred to as t
¯
t +b or t
¯
t +c), events with
two extra heavy-flavour jets (referred to as t
¯
t +b
¯
b or t
¯
t +c ¯c)
and events with one extra heavy-flavour jet containing two b-
or c
-hadrons (referred to as t
¯
t + B or t
¯
t +C). The remaining
events are labelled as t
¯
t+ light-jet events, including those
with no additional jets.
Additional background samples corresponding to t
¯
tW,
t
¯
tZand t
¯
th
SM
production, where h
SM
is the SM Higgs boson,
are also produced. The t
¯
tW sample is generated requiring at
least one W boson in the event to decay leptonically, and is
normalised to the corresponding LO cross section, 0.404pb,
times a k-factor of 1.4 [58]. The t
¯
tZ sample is generated
requiring Z → q ¯q decays and is normalised to the cor-
responding LO cross section, 0.353 pb, times a k-factor of
1.3 [58]. Finally, the t
¯
th
SM
sample is generated assuming
m
h
= 125 GeV and requiring h → b
¯
b decays. It is nor-
malised to the NLO cross section [59–61], 0.611 pb, times
the h
SM
→ b
¯
b branching ratio of 57.7 % [62–65], collected
in Ref. [66]. In these samples Z → q ¯q and h
SM
→ b
¯
b
decays are performed by Madgraph5 and top quarks and
W bosons are decayed by Pythia.
123