Physics Letters B 764 (2017) 322–327
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Physics Letters B
www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb
A combined view of sterile-neutrino constraints from CMB and
neutrino oscillation measurements
Sarah Bridle, Jack Elvin-Poole
∗
, Justin Evans, Susana Fernandez, Pawel Guzowski,
Stefan Söldner-Rembold
The University of Manchester, School of Physics and Astronomy, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received
23 November 2016
Accepted
24 November 2016
Available
online 29 November 2016
Editor: S.
Dodelson
Keywords:
Sterile
neutrinos
Cosmology
Oscillation
experiments
We perform a comparative analysis of constraints on sterile neutrinos from the Planck experiment and
from current and future neutrino oscillation experiments (MINOS, IceCube, SBN). For the first time,
we express joint constraints on N
eff
and m
sterile
eff
from the CMB in the m
2
, sin
2
2θ parameter space
used by oscillation experiments. We also show constraints from oscillation experiments in the N
eff
,
m
sterile
eff
cosmology parameter space. In a model with a single sterile neutrino species and using standard
assumptions, we find that the Planck 2015 data and the oscillation experiments measuring muon-
neutrino
(ν
μ
) disappearance have similar sensitivity.
© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP
3
.
1. Introduction
The search for low-mass sterile neutrinos is motivated by sev-
eral
experimental anomalies that are not consistent with the three-
flavour
paradigm. Sterile neutrinos would change the oscillation
probabilities observed by detecting neutrinos from accelerators,
nuclear reactors, or produced in the atmosphere. On a cosmolog-
ical
scale, they would modify the power spectrum of the Cosmic
Microwave Background (CMB) (Fig. 1).
Both
types of measurement put severe constraints on the exis-
tence
of extra neutrino flavours, but they are evaluated in terms
of different parameter sets. The CMB measurements constrain the
effective number of additional neutrino species, N
eff
(above the
Standard Model (SM) prediction of N
eff
= 3.046), and the effective
sterile neutrino mass m
sterile
eff
. Oscillation experiments parameterize
their constraints in terms of mass-squared differences, m
2
ij
, be-
tween
the mass eigenstates, and the mixing angles θ
αβ
between
mass and flavour eigenstates. Here, we use the calculation of [1]
and
show the Planck CMB cosmology constraints in the same pa-
rameter
space as used for ν
μ
disappearance measurements.
Several
experimental anomalies related to the appearance and
disappearance of ν
e
could be explained by light sterile neutri-
nos
with a mass-squared difference relative to the active states
*
Corresponding author.
E-mail
address: jack.elvin-poole@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk (J. Elvin-Poole).
of m
2
≈ 1eV
2
[2–4]. The LSND Collaboration observes an ex-
cess
of
¯
ν
e
appearance in a
¯
ν
μ
beam [5], and MiniBooNE measures
an excess of both ν
e
[6] and
¯
ν
e
appearance [7,8]. Reactor experi-
ments
observe a deficit of ≈ 6% in the
¯
ν
e
flux compared to expec-
tations [9].
Furthermore, Gallium experiments observe a smaller
ν
e
+
71
Ga →
71
Ge+e
−
event rate than expected from
51
Cr and
37
Ar
sources [10]. The Daya Bay Reactor experiment has searched for
¯
ν
e
disappearance setting limits on the mixing angle sin
2
θ
14
in the
low m
2
region 0.0002 <m
2
41
< 0.2eV
2
[11]. These results have
been combined with ν
μ
disappearances searches by MINOS [12] to
obtain stringent constraints on the product sin
2
2θ
14
sin
2
θ
24
[13].
For this analysis, we focus on recent ν
μ
disappearance results,
where no anomalies have been found, and assume that sin
2
θ
14
=
sin
2
θ
34
= 0in order to be consistent with the assumptions that
were used for deriving these limits.
Several
studies have combined oscillation and cosmological data
to constrain sterile neutrinos. Several [14–18] use the posterior
probability distribution on m
2
from short-baseline anomalies as
a prior in the cosmological analysis. Here, we convert the full
CMB cosmology constraints into the oscillation parameterisation
and vise versa, focusing on recent ν
μ
disappearance results. This
conversion has also been studied in [19,20]. Our analysis differs in
several ways: (i) unlike [19] we use the 2D combined constraints
on N
eff
and m
sterile
eff
in the cosmological analysis, rather than con-
verting
1D constraint values in each parameter individually; (ii) we
use the latest CMB data from Planck, updating from the WMAP
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.11.050
0370-2693/
© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by
SCOAP
3
.