May 31, 2021 BARRON’S 13
implicated in climate change.
Gone are the days when oil compa-
nies could delay responding to calls
for change, or implementing it at a
slow and cautious pace. For Exxon, in
particular, the defeat could lead to a
reorientation. For years, the company
has behaved as though hydrocarbons
will remain the cornerstone of the
world’s energy plans indefinitely—and
it has spent accordingly, shelling out
enormous sums to find and develop
new oil and gas prospects around the
globe. Wednesday’s shareholder vote
suggests that Exxon will now begin
planning more seriously for a future
without oil, even if that future still
is a long way off.
Exxon’s capital expenditure
totaled $21.4 billion in 2020, down
nearly $10 billion from 2019’s, but
only $4 billion below 2018’s outlays.
Return on average capital, mean-
while, peaked in 2008 at more than
34%. Last year, as o il demand col-
lapsed amid the coronavirus pan-
demic and crude prices sank, it fell
to negative 9.3%.
Exxon also pays out about $15 bil-
lion a year in dividends. Last year,
cash flow was negative, and the com-
pany borrowed to cover the payout.
Long-term debt totaled some $47.2
billion at the end of 2020, more than
double the $20.5 billion on the books
at the end of 2018.
In the short term, preserving its
dividend yield—now almost 6%—has
looked like the right move for Exxon.
Its shares returned 27% in the past 12
months, while European supermajors,
such as Shell and BP (BP), saw their
shares sink after they cut their pay-
outs in 2020. Longer term, however,
Exxon has been no winner: The stock
has returned just 0.5% a year in the
past decade, including reinvested divi-
dends, lagging behind the S&P 500
index’s 14.5% average annual return
and rival Chevron’s 4.1%.
It is this sort of poor performance
that attracted Engine No. 1, which
was launched in December 2020 by
Chris James with roughly $250 mil-
lion. The fund bought 0.02% of
Exxon’s shares. In Februar y, it sent
a letter to Exxon’s board, stating that
the o il giant needs a “more disci-
plined capital allocation strategy, im-
proved long-term strategic planning,
more shareholder-aligned manage-
ment compensation, and a board of
directors with the skills, experience,
and independence to make these
goals a reality.” Additionally, it
sought to unseat four Exxon direc-
tors, arguing that the board needs
fresh voices to focus on the problems
posed by climate change.
Such demands from a little-known
firm would have been laughable just
a few years ago. But some of Engine’s
board nominees won the backing of
investment titans, such as the Califor-
nia State Teachers’ Retirement Sys-
tem, or Calstrs; the Church of Eng-
land’s investment fund; the California
Public Employees’ Retirement Sys-
tem; and the New York State Com-
mon Retirement Fund. Proxy advi-
sory firms also backed some of
Engine No. 1’s nominees, as did
BlackRock (BLK), the world’s largest
asset manager, which owns 6.6% of
Exxon’s shares.
Exxon said in a statement after
Wednesda y’s vote that it looks forward
to working with the new directors. It
also acknow ledged conversa tions it has
had with shareholders about finding
low-carbon solutions, improving costs,
and boosting earnings. The company
said that it has “significantl y reduced
emissions” and has further reductions
planned. “We heard from shareholders
toda y about their desire to further
these efforts, and we are well posi-
tioned to respond,” said Darren
Woods, Exxon’ s chairman and CEO.
Exxon didn’t respond to Bar ron’s
requests for comment. However, in
a Barron’s interview in early May,
Woods defended the qualifications of
Exxon’s current board members and
the company’s “long history” in car-
bon capture and storage and hydro-
gen technologies.
N
ow, Exxon—and Chevron and
Shell—have more motivation
to embrace the energy indus-
try’s coming transition. And
they will. While eco-friendly propos-
als were once perceived as costly dis-
tractions, investors now realize that
the cost of doing nothing in a decar-
bonizing world is potentially too
high. “We believe these events are
consistent with a pattern of increased
shareholder awareness and concern
regarding climate, [and] the potential
for inaction to raise companies’ cost
of capital and potentially inhibit or
slow value creation,” wrote James
West, an analyst at Evercore ISI,
on Thursday.
Exxon’ s shares have rallied 40%, to
$58.37, since Engine No. 1 wen t public
with its activist campaign, outpacing
a gain of 28% in the Energy Select
Sector SPDR fund (XLE). Sure, a
45% rally in crude prices has helped,
but the prospect of more capital disci-
pline and a greater focus on renewable-
energy sources also has enticed in-
vestors. Engine No. 1 won’t control
Exxon’s board, but its influence could
help the stock rise even more.
B
Exxon Key Data
Exxon Mobil / XOM
Recent Price $58.56
Market Value (bil) $248
52-Week Price Change 26.6%
2022E EPS $4.29
2022E P/E 13.7
2022E Return on Assets 7.4 %
Debt / Equity Ratio 0.4
Dividend Yield 5.9%
E=estimate. Source: Bloomber
Exxon’s
shares have
rallied 40%
since Engine
No.1went
public with
its activist
campaign.
Big Oil ’s Bad Week
Is Good for In vestors
By pushing Exxon Mobil and other oil giants toward more-sustainable
strategies, shareholders and regulators are strengthening the companies
B
ig Oil suffered a triple
setback on Wednesday,
but its defeat could move
the industry for ward in
ways that will benefit en-
ergy companies and their
shareholders.
Exxon Mobil (ticker: XOM) lost at
least two board seats to Engine No. 1,
an upstart investment fund bent on
improving the company’s financial
discipline and moving it toward a
net-zero emissions strategy by 2050.
On the same day, a Dutch court or-
dered European energy giant Royal
Dutch Shell (RDS.A) to slash its
carbon emissions by a net 45% by
2030. And, at Chevron’s (CVX)
annual meeting, shareholders sup-
ported a nonbinding proposal to ask
the company to cut carbon emissions
generated by the use of its products.
Carbon-dioxide emissions have been
By CARLETON ENGLISH
Photo illustration by Sarina Finkelstein; (reference) Getty Images (1); Dreamstime (1)