多摄像头网络技术：分布式监控的应用与原理

需积分: 9 47 浏览量更新于2024-07-24 收藏 22.14MB PDF 举报

"Multi-Camera Networks Principles and Applications" 本书《多摄像头网络：原理和应用》是针对视频监控领域的专业著作，特别适合那些从事分布式摄像头和多摄像头视频监控系统研究的学者和工程师阅读。它深入探讨了如何利用多个摄像头构建有效的监控网络，以及在实际应用中的各种技术和挑战。内容涵盖： 1. **多摄像头网络架构**：书中可能详细阐述了多摄像头网络的基本设计原则，包括摄像头的部署策略、网络拓扑结构（如星型、环形、树形或网状结构）以及如何优化这些结构以实现高效的数据传输和处理。 2. **图像同步与校准**：在多摄像头系统中，确保不同摄像头捕获的视频帧同步至关重要。这可能涉及到时间戳同步技术、空间校准以消除视差，以及如何处理光照变化和环境因素对图像质量的影响。 3. **目标检测与跟踪**：多摄像头网络的一个关键应用是目标检测和跟踪。书中可能介绍了各种算法，如基于模板匹配、特征点检测、深度学习的方法，以及如何在多摄像头之间共享和融合信息来提高跟踪的准确性和鲁棒性。 4. **数据管理和分析**：随着大量视频数据的生成，有效的数据存储、检索和分析变得至关重要。书中可能涉及了数据压缩技术、视频摘要方法，以及如何利用智能分析工具进行行为识别和异常检测。 5. **网络安全与隐私保护**：在分布式监控系统中，数据安全和用户隐私是不可忽视的问题。这部分可能会讨论加密技术、访问控制策略，以及如何在保障监控效率的同时，确保系统的安全性。 6. **案例研究与应用**：书中的实例部分可能包含了真实世界的多摄像头监控系统案例，例如城市交通监控、零售店人流分析、公共场所安全监控等，这些案例有助于读者理解理论知识在实际中的应用。 7. **未来趋势与挑战**：最后，作者可能对未来的技术发展趋势进行了展望，如物联网(IoT)集成、5G通信对监控网络的影响、人工智能在视频分析中的进一步应用，以及当前技术面临的挑战和潜在解决方案。《多摄像头网络：原理和应用》是一本全面介绍多摄像头监控系统技术的专业书籍，对于希望在这个领域深入学习和研究的人员来说，是一份宝贵的参考资料。通过阅读，读者不仅可以掌握基础理论，还能了解到最新的研究进展和技术应用。

6 CHAPTER 1 Multi-View Geometry for Camera Networks

Here, the symbol | denotes the horizontal concatenation of two matrices. Then

⎡

⎢

⎣

⎤

⎥

⎦

⫽

⎡

⎣

f 00

0 f 0

001

⎤

⎦



R | ⫺RC



⎡

⎢

⎣

⎤

⎥

⎦

⫽

⎡

⎣

f 00

0 f 0

001

⎤

⎦

⎛

⎝

⎡

⎣

⎤

⎦

⫺C

⎞

⎠

⫽

⎡

⎣

f 00

0 f 0

001

⎤

⎦

⎡

⎣

⎤

⎦

⫽

⎡

⎣

⎤

⎦

∼

⎡

⎢

⎣

⎤

⎥

⎦

We often state this relationship succinctly as

u∼PX (1.4)

Intrinsic and Extrinsic Parameters

We note that the camera matrix can be factored as

P ⫽ KR [I |⫺ C] (1.5)

The matrix K contains the intrinsic parameters of the camera, while the variables R and

C comprise the extrinsic parameters, specifying its position and orientation in the world

coordinate system. While the intrinsic parameter matrix K in (1.3) was just a diagonal

matrix containing the focal length, a more general camera can be constructed using a K

matrix of the form

K ⫽

⎡

⎣

⎤

⎦

⎡

⎣

fs/m

⎤

⎦

(1.6)

In addition to the focal length of the camera f , this intrinsic parameter matrix includes

and m

, the number of pixels per x and y unit of image coordinates, respectively;

, p

), the coordinates of the principal point of the image; and s, the skew (deviation

from rectangularity) of the pixels. For high-quality cameras, the pixels are usually square,

the skew is typically 0, and the principal point can often be approximated by the image

origin.

A general camera matrix has 11 degrees of freedom (since it is only deﬁned up to a

scale factor). The camera center and the rotation matrix each account for 3 degrees of

freedom, leaving 5 degrees of freedom for the intrinsic parameters.

Extracting Camera Parameters from P

Often, we begin with an estimate of a 3⫻ 4 camera matrix P and want to extract the

intrinsic and extrinsic parameters from it. The homogeneous coordinates of the camera

center C can easily be extracted as the right-hand null vector of P (i.e., a vector satisfying

1.2 Image Formation 7

PC ⫽0). If we denote the left 3⫻3blockofP as M, then we can factor M ⫽KR, where K

is upper triangular and R is orthogonal using a modiﬁed version of the QR decomposition

[4]. Enforcing that K has positive values on its diagonal should remove any ambiguity

about the factorization.

More General Cameras

While the perspective model of projection generally matches the image formation process

of a real camera, an afﬁne model of projection is sometimes more computationally appeal-

ing. Although less mathematically accurate, such an approximation may be acceptable

in cases where the depth of scene points is fairly uniform or the ﬁeld of view is fairly

narrow. Common choices for linear models include orthographic projection, in which

the camera matrix has the form

P ⫽

⎡

⎣

1000

0100

0001

⎤

⎦





(1.7)

or weak perspective projection, in which the camera matrix has the form

P ⫽

⎡

⎣

␣

000

0 ␣

0001

⎤

⎦





(1.8)

Finally, we note that real cameras frequently exhibit radial lens distortion, which

can be modeled by



ˆx

ˆy



⫽L





⫹y





(1.9)

where (x, y) is the result of applying the perspective model (1.4), and L(·) is a function of

the radial distance from the image center, often modeled as a fourth-degree polynomial.

The parameters of the distortion function are typically measured ofﬂine using a calibration

grid [5].

1.2.3 Estimating the Camera Matrix

The P matrix for a given camera is typically estimated based on a set of matched corre-

spondences between image points u

∈R

and scene points X

with known coordinates

. That is, the goal is to select the matrix P ∈R

3⫻4

that best matches a given set of

point mappings:

→u

, j ⫽1,...,N } (1.10)

Each correspondence (u

, X

) produces two independent linear equations in the ele-

ments of P. Thus, the equations for all the data points can be collected into a linear

system Ap ⫽0, where A isa2N⫻12 matrix involving the data, and p ⫽( p

,...,p

)

is the vector of unknowns. Since the camera matrix is unique up to scale, we must ﬁx

some scaling (say, ||p||

⫽1) to ensure that Ap cannot become arbitrarily small.

The least squares minimization problem is then

min Ap

s.t. p

p ⫽1 (1.11)

8 CHAPTER 1 Multi-View Geometry for Camera Networks

The solution to this problem is well known: The minimizer is the eigenvector p∈R

of A

A corresponding to the minimal eigenvalue, which can be computed via the singular

value decomposition. This eigenvector is then reassembled into a 3⫻4 matrix

P, which

can be factored into intrinsic and extrinsic parameters as described earlier.

To maintain numerical stability, it is critical to normalize the data before solving the

estimation problem. That is, each of the sets {u

} and {X

} should be translated to have

zero mean and then isotropically scaled so that the average distance to the origin is

√

for the image points and

√

3 for the scene points. These translations and scalings can

be represented by similarity transform matrices T and U that act on the homogeneous

coordinates of u

and X

. After the camera matrix for the normalized points

P has been

estimated, the estimate of the camera matrix in the original coordinates is given by

P ⫽ T

⫺1

PU (1.12)

Several more advanced algorithms for camera matrix estimation (also called resection-

ing) are discussed in Hartley and Zisserman [6], typically requiring iterative, nonlinear

optimization.

When the data sets contain outliers (i.e., incorrect point correspondences inconsistent

with the underlying projection model), it is necessary to detect and reject them during

the estimation process. Frequently, the robust estimation framework called RANSAC [7]

is employed for this purpose. RANSAC is based on randomly selecting a large number

of data subsets, each containing the minimal number of correspondences that make

the estimation problem solvable. An estimate of outlier probability is used to select a

number of subsets to guarantee that at least one of the minimal subsets has a high

probability of containing all inliers.

The point correspondences required for camera matrix estimation are typically gener-

ated using images of a calibration grid resembling a high-contrast checkerboard. Bouguet

authored a widely disseminated camera calibration toolbox in MATLAB that only requires

the user to print and acquire several images of such a calibration grid [8].

1.3 TWO-CAMERA GEOMETRY

Next, we discuss the image relationships resulting from the same static scene being

imaged by two cameras

C and C



, as illustrated in Figure 1.2. These could be two phys-

ically separate cameras or a single moving camera at different points in time. Let the

scene coordinates of a point X in the

C coordinate system be (X, Y , Z) and, in the C



coordinate system, be (X



, Y



, Z



). We denote the corresponding image coordinates of

X in

P and P



by u⫽(x, y) and u



⫽(x



, y



), respectively. The points u and u



are said to

be corresponding points, and the pair (u, u



) is called a point correspondence.

Assuming standard values for the intrinsic parameters, the scene point X is projected

onto the image points u and u



via the perspective projection equations (1.2):

x ⫽f

y ⫽ f

(1.13)



⫽f



⫽f



(1.14)

10 CHAPTER 1 Multi-View Geometry for Camera Networks

1.3.1 Epipolar Geometry and Its Estimation

We now introduce the fundamental matrix, which encapsulates an important constraint

on point correspondences between two images of the same scene. For each generic pair

of cameras (

C, C



), there exists a matrix F of rank 2 such that for all correspondences

(u, u



)⫽((x, y), (x



, y



))∈P⫻



⎡

⎣



⎤

⎦

⎡

⎣

⎤

⎦

⫽0 (1.19)

The fundamental matrix is unique up to scale provided that there exists no quadric surface

Q containing the line CC



and every point in the scene S [9].

Given the fundamental matrix F for a camera pair (

C, C



), we obtain a constraint

on the possible locations of point correspondences between the associated image pair

(

I, I



The epipolar line corresponding to a point u ∈

P is the set of points:



⫽





⫽(x



, y



)

∈P















⫽0



(1.20)

If u is the image of scene point X in P, the image u



of X in P



is constrained to lie on

the epipolar line 

. Epipolar lines for points in P



can be deﬁned accordingly. Hence,

epipolar lines exist in conjugate pairs (, 



), such that the match to a point u∈ must lie

on 



and vice versa. Conjugate epipolar lines are generated by intersecting any plane ⌸

containing the baseline



with the pair of image planes (P, P



) (see Figure 1.3). For

a more thorough review of epipolar geometry, the reader is referred to [10].

The epipoles e ∈

P and e



∈P



are the projections of the camera centers C



and C onto

P and P



, respectively. It can be seen from Figure 1.3 that the epipolar lines in each image

all intersect at the epipole. In fact, the homogeneous coordinates of the epipoles e and e



are the right and left eigenvectors of F, respectively, corresponding to the eigenvalue 0.

FIGURE 1.3

Relationship between two images of the same scene, encapsulated by the epipolar geometry. For any

scene point X, we construct the plane ⌸ containing X and the two camera centers, which intersect

the image planes at the two epipolar lines  and 



剩余587页未读，继续阅读

pb09210

粉丝: 18
资源: 16

多摄像头网络技术：分布式监控的应用与原理

Multi-Camera Networks: Principles and Applications

复杂网络大家名著：Complex Networks---Principles, Methods and Applications书籍配套数据

复杂网络大家名著：Complex Networks---Principles, Methods and Applications书籍配套代码

国外电子书-Understanding GPS Principles and Applications

Electrical-Engineering-Principles-and-Applications

Handbook-of-Swarm-Intelligence-Concepts-Principles-and-Applications

Cooperation in Wireless Networks-Principles and Applications（2006）

Gesture Recognition - Principles, Techniques and Applications

Springer.Cooperation.in.Wireless.Networks-Principles.and.Applications.2006

Finite-Temperature Field Theory-Principles and Applications

最新资源