Physics Letters B 784 (2018) 248–254
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Physics Letters B
www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb
Probing nonstandard neutrino interactions at the LHC Run II
Debajyoti Choudhury
a
, Kirtiman Ghosh
b,c,∗
, Saurabh Niyogi
d
a
Department of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India
b
Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar 751005, India
c
HBNI, Mumbai, India
d
Department of Physics, Gokhale Memorial Girls’ College, Harish Mukherjee Road, Kolkata 700020, India
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received
29 March 2018
Received
in revised form 16 July 2018
Accepted
29 July 2018
Available
online 14 August 2018
Editor:
A. Ringwald
Searching for non-standard neutrino interactions, as a means for discovering physics beyond the Standard
Model, has been one of the key goals of dedicated neutrino experiments, current and future. This has
received recent fillip in the wake of reported anomalies in leptonic B-decays. We demonstrate here that
much of the parameter space accessible to such dedicated neutrino experiments is already ruled out by
the RUN II data of the Large Hadron Collider experiment.
© 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP
3
.
1. Introduction
Precision measurements of the neutrino mixing parameters,
made over the past few decades has significantly shortened the
list of unanswered questions in the standard scenario to just the
issues of the neutrino mass hierarchy i.e., sign(δm
2
31
), the CP phase
and the correct octant for the mixing angle θ
23
. While the simplest
way to generate neutrino masses is to add right handed neutrino
fields to the Standard Model (SM) particle content, it is hard to
explain the extreme smallness of the said masses. Several scenar-
ios
going beyond the SM have been proposed to this end, often
tying up with other unanswered questions such as (electroweak)
leptogenesis [1,2], neutrino magnetic moments [3–6], and even
dark energy [7,8](by invoking neutrino condensates). An agnos-
tic
alternative is to add dimension-five terms consistent with the
symmetries and particle content of the SM, which naturally leads
to desired tiny Majorana masses for the left-handed neutrinos. Ir-
respective
of the approach, once new physics is invoked to explain
the non-zero neutrino masses, it is unnatural to exclude the pos-
sibility
of non-standard interactions (NSI) as well. Indeed, NSI has
been studied in the context of atmospheric neutrinos [9–14], CPT
violation [15,16], violation of the equivalence principle [13], large
extra dimension models [17], sterile neutrinos [18–20] and collider
experiments [21–24].
*
Corresponding author.
E-mail
addresses: debajyoti.choudhury@gmail.com (D. Choudhury),
kirti.gh@gmail.com (K. Ghosh), saurabhphys@gmail.com (S. Niyogi).
While no incontrovertible evidence for such NSI exists, certain
anomalies in leptonic B-decays [25–30], together, strongly indicate
a new physics scale of a few TeVs [31]. Not only is the existence of
analogous neutrino-NSI conceivable, there exist theoretically well-
motivated
scenarios wherein NSI would manifest primarily in the
neutrino sector (e.g., those referred to earlier). Consequently, the
search of NSI constitutes a major stated goal of neutrino experi-
ments.
We demonstrate, in this letter, that much of the parameter
space that such a future dedicated neutrino experiment would be
sensitive to, can already be ruled out by an analysis of the LHC
data.
At
sufficiently low energies, a wide class of new physics sce-
narios
can be parametrized, in a model independent way, through
the use of effective four-fermion interaction terms.
1
The investiga-
tion
of these assumes further importance as the aforementioned
anomalies in B-decays are quite well-explained on the introduc-
tion
of such terms [31]. While these, in general, would incorporate
both charged-current (CC) and neutral-current (NC) interactions,
we shall confine ourselves largely to the latter (coming back to
the former only later). The dimension-6 neutrino-quark interac-
tions
can, then, be expressed, in terms of the chirality projection
operators P
X
(X = L, R), as
L
4
=−2
√
2 G
F
qX
αβ
qγ
μ
P
X
q
ν
α
γ
μ
P
L
ν
β
+
H.c., (1)
1
The obvious caveat is the situation where the NSI is occasioned by a light (well
below the weak scale) mediator [32–34]. Not only do such models need ultrasmall
fermionic couplings, the model-dependence is extreme and no unified treatment is
possible. Hence we shall eschew a discussion of the same.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.07.053
0370-2693/
© 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by
SCOAP
3
.