data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d04a/7d04a89906dcdb31679fa09df3a9234e7c46f3db" alt=""
Design and analysis of LDMOS_SCR with narrow
windows
Xiang-Liang Jin
1, 2*
, Yi-Fei Zheng
1,2
, Yang Wang
1,2
, Zi-Jie Zhou
1,2
1
Faculty of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China 1
.
2
Hunan Engineering Laboratory for Microelectronics, Optoelectronics and System on a Chip, Xiangtan 411105 2.
*
Phone: +86 0731 58292195
E-mail –jinxl@xtu.edu.cn
Abstract- In this paper, an improved LDPMOS_SCR without a
LDPMOS structure (NonLDPMOS_SCR) is discussed, which is
realized in 0.5-µm 5V/18V/24V CDMOS process. The theoretical
analysis and transmission line pulse (TLP) testing system are used
to predict and characterize the proposed ESD protection devices.
According to the measurement results, compared with the normal
LDPMOS_SCR, NonLDPMOS_SCR elevates the second
breakdown current (It2) from 3.87A to 4.64A and decreases the
trigger voltage (Vh) from 33V to 21.4V without expanding device
area. Furthermore, the influence of the size of D2 and D3 (as
shown in Fig.1(c)) on holding voltage is discussed. The TLP results
confirm that by adding the width of D2, the holding voltage is
increased from 11.7V to 14.79V. And by adding the width of D3,
the holding voltage is increased from 11.7V to 15.9V. It is proved
that increasing the width of D3 in the proposed device is more
effective in increasing the holding voltage.
I. INTRODUCTION
With the rapid development of power integrated
technology, high-voltage (HV) devices are widely used in
smart-power integrated circuits, such as automotive electronics,
high-voltage circuit drivers, and power management circuits
[1-2]. And electrostatic discharge (ESD) reliability has become
one of the most severe reliability issues in HV devices. ESD
protection devices for HV ICs require a reasonable
, a high
holding voltage (
) and strong ESD robustness within a
small device area [3]. Laterally-diffused
metal-oxide-semiconductor (LDMOS) with embedded silicon
control rectifier (LDMOS-SCR) is proposed for providing ESD
protection in HV process due to its good compatibility with
CMOS processes [4-5]. However, with the feature size of HV
ICs scaling down, LDMOS-SCR served as ESD protection is
greatly limited by its weak latch-up immunity and the high
trigger voltage(
) . Generally, the latch-up immunity is
determined by the
and the holding current (
). Some
prior studies have been proposed to increase
[6-8].
However, the consumed silicon area and the latch-up risk of
LDMOS-SCR could not be sufficiently minimized by these
methods. In this work, high performance in s mall
areas(47um*56um) of NonLDPMOS_SCR has been achieved
though the increase in the width of D2 and D3. And the result of
TLP has some guidance as to the trade-off between the holding
voltage and the maximum degree of protection required for the
device.
II. Devices Structure and ESD Characteristic Analysis
The LDPMOS_SCR device illustrated in Fig.1 (a) is a
PNPNP DDSCR consisting of two LDPMOS devices with their
drain in common. The P+ region in PW is reserved for the
purpose of obeying to the design rule without any modifications
to the structure. The drain electrode is floating. The bulk, source,
and gate electrode of each LDPMOS are combined to form
anode or cathode of the device. When a positive ESD pulse is
stressed on the anode of LDPMOS_SCR, the gate, source, and
bulk of LDPMOS device Mp1 are all connected to high
potential. Mp1 is shutting off. The other LDPMOS device Mp2
is on-state because the gate of Mp2 is bound to ground. The b-c
(PW/NWD) junction of the parasitic BJT (T1//T3) in Mp1 is
reverse biased, and it generates a large amount of electron-hole
pairs when the voltage reaches a level of avalanche breakdown.
Only if the voltage on the parasitic resistor R1 is large enough to
forward bias the e-b (P+/NWD) junction of T1//T3, the current
conducting by T1//T3 will drive the parasitic SCR composed of
T1//T3 and T2, and the SCR path will become the major
discharging path eventually. Hence, the lateral PNP BJT T1//T3
and NPN BJT T2 pair form a regenerative thyristor to conduct
the ESD current through the real line path shown in Fig.1 (b).
When a negative ESD pulse is applied to the anode of this
device, it is equivalent as a positive ESD pulse is stressed on the
cathode. Since the device structure is symmetric, its working
mechanism will be similar to the case that when a positive ESD
pulse is applied to the anode. But device triggering will occur at
the NWD/PW junction on the cathode side.
Fig.1(c) shows the NonLDPMOS_SCR. Compared with
LDPMOS_SCR, the NWD-PW junction is moved under the P+
diffusion region of the drain. So there is no LDPMOS structure
in NonLDPMOS_SCR. Fig.2 (d) is the equivalent schematic
when a positive ESD pulse is stressed on the anode. Its operation
mechanism is almost the same as LDPMOS_SCR. The only
difference is that when a positive ESD pulse is stressed on the
anode of NonLDPMOS_SCR, the Mp1 and Mp2 are neither
on-state nor off-state. Because there is no channel in Mp1 and
Mp2, which can be considered respectively as resistor Rmp1
and Rmp2, as shown in Fig.2(d).