functions (2.3). It is clear that S
1
encodes the usual lower spin couplings like Yukawa,
electro-magnetic and gravitational ones as well as couplings to higher spin sources. In
what follows we refer to f as to background fields to stress that they are not required to
be infinitesimal.
The full action of the conformal Dirac field coupled to all sources can be written as
6
S = S
0
+ S
1
=
Z
d
d
x
¯
ψ(iγ · ∂
x
+ if)ψ , (2.9)
where it is useful to absorb the kinetic term into F = iγ · ∂
x
+ if.
To describe sources in terms of the constrained system (2.5), we should also allow for
a deformation h = h(γ, ∂
x
|x) of the −∂
2
x
constraint, which can altogether be packed into
H = −∂
2
x
+ h. In these terms the equations of motion for the Dirac field are identified as
physical state conditions:
F ψ = (iγ · ∂
x
+ if)ψ = 0 , Hψ = (−∂
2
x
+ h)ψ = 0 . (2.10)
If we insist that the constraint algebra is unchanged we find
[F, F ] = 2H ⇐⇒ 2[γ · ∂
x
, f] + [f, f] = −2h , (2.11)
so that, as expected, h is determined by f and H does not introduce any new indepen-
dent sources.
There is a natural gauge symmetry which acts on both ψ and F and leaves the La-
grangian (2.9) unchanged. Indeed, consider
δF = [, F ] + {α, F } + {β, H}, δψ = ψ − αψ − F βψ , (2.12)
where the three gauge parameters , α and β are functions of the same type as F , i.e.
they depend on γ, ∂
x
and x. The reality of the action implies
†
= −, α
†
= α and
β
†
= β. The -symmetry is a usual gauge transformation, while α and β are responsible
for reparameterization of the constraints, which we discuss in the next section.
To study gauge symmetry for F , H it is convenient to work in terms of symbols
rather than operators. To this end we introduce variables θ
a
, p
a
associated with γ
a
and
∂
a
, respectively. The algebra of operators is then the tensor product of Weyl algebra and
Clifford algebra. Seen as a ?-product algebra of symbols it can be identified as an algebra
freely generated by x
a
, p
b
, θ
a
modulo the following relations:
[x
a
, p
b
]
?
= δ
a
b
, [θ
a
, θ
b
]
?
= 2η
ab
, (2.13)
where [A, B]
?
:
= A ? B − (−1)
|A||B|
B ? A denotes ?-product super-commutator, with the
Grassmann degree assigned according to |x
a
| = |p
a
| = 0 and |θ
a
| = 1. The linearized gauge
symmetries of f read as
δf = −(p · ∂
θ
− θ · ∂
x
) + 2α(p · θ) + 2β(p · p) + . . . , (2.14)
where we dropped the terms with derivatives of α and β.
6
Note that the usual minimal coupling of fermion to gravity, |e|
¯
ψγ
a
e
m
a
(∂
m
+ω
a,b
m
1
8
[γ
a
, γ
b
])ψ, is certainly a
part of (2.7) upon appropriate identification of fields, see also the comment below about general covariance.
The Taylor coefficients of f should be understood as f
a
1
...a
s
m
1
...m
q
, i.e. as tensors of the fiber Lorentz group
O(d − 1, 1) and transforming as coefficients of differential operators in the m’s. In the present paper we do
not dwell on the global geometry issues.
– 7 –