Physics Letters B 755 (2016) 353–357
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Physics Letters B
www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb
Singlet scalar resonances and the diphoton excess
Samuel D. McDermott
∗
, Patrick Meade, Harikrishnan Ramani
C. N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received
17 December 2015
Received
in revised form 4 February 2016
Accepted
15 February 2016
Available
online 23 February 2016
Editor:
A. Ringwald
ATLAS and CMS recently released the first results of searches for diphoton resonances in 13 TeV data,
revealing a modest excess at an invariant mass of approximately 750 GeV. We find that it is generically
possible that a singlet scalar resonance is the origin of the excess while avoiding all other constraints.
We highlight some of the implications of this model and how compatible it is with certain features of
the experimental results. In particular, we find that the very large total width of the excess is difficult to
explain with loop-level decays alone, pointing to other interesting bounds and signals if this feature of
the data persists. Finally we comment on the robust Zγ signature that will always accompany the model
we investigate.
© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP
3
.
1. Introduction
The excess found in diphoton final states in the 13 TeV ATLAS
and CMS data at 750 GeV [1,2] presents an interesting model-
building
challenge. (While this paper was in preparation a number
of attempts at explaining the diphoton excess appeared [3].) ATLAS
and CMS both characterize the events that make up their signal to
have the same composition as the background in sidebands [1,2].
Therefore, we assume that this peak in the event spectrum comes
from the direct production of a resonance rather than a cascade
decay.
If
the signal is caused by a resonance that decays to diphotons,
the Landau–Yang theorem [4] restricts the spin of the resonance
to 0 or 2. The spin 2 possibility was preliminarily investigated by
CMS [2], and, though interesting, it is difficult to construct a model
that satisfies all constraints. However, an example of a scalar res-
onance
which decays to diphotons is already provided by the SM
Higgs, illustrating that it is straightforward to construct a “cousin”
of the Higgs to explain this excess.
Models
of a scalar resonance which explain the excess can
come from sectors with a wide variety of field content and quan-
tum
number assignments [3]. The simplest possibility which avoids
many correlated bounds is a resonance that is a singlet under the
Standard Model gauge group. This implies that the coupling to
protons and photons is generated by loops of new non-Standard
Model particles that are colored and charged.
*
Corresponding author.
E-mail
address: samuel.mcdermott@stonybrook.edu (S.D. McDermott).
As discussed in more detail below, the width of the excess
preferred by ATLAS and CMS [1,2] immediately implies additional
constraints on singlet models. The preferred fit from ATLAS has a
width of 45 GeV [1] with a local significance of 3.9σ , although
this represents only a marginal improvement over a narrow-width
model. CMS slightly prefers a narrow width [2], but overall has
a smaller number of events, which can be partially attributed to
their lower luminosity. The model point favored by CMS data has
a width of O(100 MeV), with an excess of 2.6σ . However, CMS
is compatible at a similar level of confidence with a width of
42 GeV. It should be noted that ATLAS, while compatible with
narrow width, prefers a larger width for several reasons. In the
narrow width model, ATLAS finds a pull based on marginalizing
over the width. This indicates a resonance width larger than the
experimental resolution of 5.3GeV(we estimate this by a linear
interpolation on the diphoton invariant mass resolution parameter
listed in section 5 of [1]). Additionally, when comparing the excess
between 13 TeV and 8TeV, ATLAS finds that the narrow width
is only compatible at the 2.2σ level whereas the larger width is
compatible with a smaller 1.4σ tension. Given the limited data it
is therefore still possible to have a narrow width (indicative, as we
discuss below, of strictly loop-induced processes), but it is more
experimentally favored to have a larger width.
This
brings singlet models under some tension. The number of
observed photons is given by
N
γγ
= σ
prod
×
γγ
tot
×L × × A, (1)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.033
0370-2693/
© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by
SCOAP
3
.