"考满分 GRE Argument参考答案1：古村特定花纹编织篮唯一来源"

The argument presented asserts that woven baskets with a distinct pattern were only found near the prehistoric village of Palea. This statement is used to draw a conclusion about the origins of these baskets. However, there are several flaws in this line of reasoning that need to be addressed. First, the argument assumes that the presence of these baskets exclusively near Palea indicates that they originated from the village. This assumption overlooks the possibility that the baskets could have been traded or transported from other regions to Palea. Without further evidence to support the claim that the baskets were actually made in Palea, the conclusion that they originated from the village is unfounded. Second, the argument fails to consider the possibility of cultural diffusion or imitation. It is possible that the distinctive pattern on the baskets was adopted by neighboring villages or communities after being introduced to them by Palea. Without exploring alternative explanations for the presence of these baskets outside of Palea, the argument jumps to the conclusion that they must have originated from the village. Furthermore, the argument does not provide any information about the timeframe in which these baskets were found near Palea. It is crucial to establish whether the baskets were contemporaneous with the village or if they were from a later time period. Without this information, it is difficult to draw any meaningful conclusions about the origins of the baskets. In conclusion, the argument that woven baskets with a unique pattern found near Palea must have originated from the village is unsupported and oversimplified. Without considering alternative explanations, such as trade, cultural diffusion, or imitation, the conclusion drawn in the argument lacks credibility. More research and evidence are needed to accurately determine the origins of these baskets.