The ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 798 (2019) 134942 5
Table 2
Object
selection criteria. The significance of the transverse impact parameter is defined as the transverse impact
parameter d
0
divided by its uncertainty, σ
d
0
, of tracks relative to the primary vertex with the highest sum of
track p
T
. The longitudinal impact parameter z
0
is multiplied by sinθ , where θ is the polar angle of the track.
Electron channel Muon channel
Lepton:
p
T
>26 GeV >28 GeV
|η||η| < 1.37 or 1.52 < |η| < 2.47 < 2.5
Leading lepton quality Medium [61], isolated [61]Medium[62], isolated [62]
Subleading lepton quality Medium, no isolation Medium, no isolation
Transverse impact parameter significance
|d
0
|/σ
d
0
< 5.0 |d
0
|/σ
d
0
< 3.0
Longitudinal impact parameter
|z
0
|sin θ<0.5mm
Trimmed large-R jet:
p
T
>200 GeV
|η| <2.0
Mass
> 50 GeV None
• R
y
between the subleading lepton and the large-R jet is re-
quired
be less than 1, in order for the lepton to be inside the
jet.
• φ between the leading lepton and the large-R jet is required
to be greater than 2, in order to have a balanced topology be-
tween
the N
R
and the lepton from the W
R
decay.
• In order to reduce the Z +jets background, events with a dilep-
ton
invariant mass of less than 200 GeV are vetoed, and the
φ between the leading and subleading leptons is required to
be greater than 1.5.
After applying these requirements, simulation studies show that
the background consists mainly of tt and Z +jets processes (includ-
ing
off-shell Z /γ
∗
production), while contributions from W +jets,
single-top-quark and multijet processes are negligible. No require-
ments
on b-tagged jets are applied, as the W
R
in the signal can
decay to a top and bottom quark pair.
The final discriminating observable used in the analysis is the
reconstructed mass of the W
R
candidate, m
reco
W
R
. In the electron
channel, the selected large-R jet corresponds to the N
R
candidate,
and therefore the W
R
candidate four-momentum is obtained by
adding the large-R jet and the leading electron four-momenta. In
the muon channel, the N
R
candidate four-momentum is obtained
by adding the four-momentum of the selected large-R jet to that of
the muon contained in the jet. The W
R
candidate four-momentum
is obtained by adding the N
R
candidate four-momentum to that of
the leading muon. In both cases, if there is more than one large-R
jet
in the event, the large-R jet with the largest mass is used.
Based
on the range of m
reco
W
R
, control and signal regions (CR,
SR) are defined as specified in Table 3. The CR is defined in a
region of low reconstructed m
reco
W
R
corresponding to a parameter
space excluded by previous searches [14]. The background in the
SR is evaluated from a combined fit of MC and data events in the
CR (described in Section 6). To test the performance of large-R
jets
containing electrons, a validation region (VR) is defined with
a selection orthogonal to the CR and the SR. This requires a muon
balanced in p
T
by a large-R jet with an electron inside. By con-
struction,
the VR is dominated by t
¯
t events decaying dileptonically
to eμ final states.
In
Fig. 3, good agreement is observed between data and sim-
ulation
in the m
reco
W
R
distributions in the control regions of the
electron and muon channels, as well as in the validation region.
In the bottom-right plot, the selection efficiency times acceptance
is shown for different signal samples. The efficiency decreases for
lower m
N
R
and higher m
W
R
values. The largest inefficiency arises
from the difficulty of electron reconstruction close to hadronic ac-
tivity,
which is discussed in the next section. The probability of
producing an off-shell W
R
increases with the mass. This can result
Table 3
Definition
of signal, control and validation regions.
Region Range of m
reco
W
R
Lepton flavour
Signal region (SR) > 2TeV Same flavour
Control region (CR) < 2TeV Same flavour
Validation region (VR) All Mixed flavour (leading:
muon; subleading: electron)
in a less boosted N
R
, explaining the drop in signal efficiency for
higher m
W
R
values.
5. Performance of large-R jets containing electrons
A distinguishing feature of this search is the use of large-R
jets
containing electrons as a proxy for N
R
in the electron chan-
nel.
Since the large-R jet construction procedure is based on en-
ergy
clusters calibrated at the hadronic scale, the effect of a non-
negligible
fraction of EM clusters in the large-R jet needs to be
investigated. The analysis does not use the kinematic properties of
the identified electron inside the large-R jets to reconstruct the
N
R
or W
R
invariant masses, but uses the mass of the large-R jet,
which includes the associated electron clusters. The presence of
real hadronic activity close to an electron may affect the recon-
struction
of the electron.
The
jet mass and energy scales, JMS and JES, defined as the
average of the ratio of the mass or energy of the reconstructed
and corresponding generator-level large-R jets, are used to study
the effect of including the large EM-cluster of the electron in
the jet reconstruction. The matching between detector-level and
generator-level large-R jets is performed with R
y
< 0.75. The
generator-level jet is obtained by clustering stable final-state parti-
cles
(with lifetime greater than 30 ps) except muons and neutrinos
using the same jet algorithm, radius parameter and trimming used
at the detector-level. The JMS and JES of the selected large-R jets
for a few representative signal samples are shown in Fig. 4 as a
function of the ratio of the energy of the electron to the energy of
the large-R jet. This ratio can be considered a proxy for the elec-
tromagnetic
energy fraction in the large-R jet. Constant values of
JES and JMS within a few percent of unity indicate that the large-R
jet
has only a weak dependence on the fraction of electromagnetic
energy inside the jet, and thus no particular additional corrections
are required for the signal large-R jets. Typical numbers for the
large-R jet mass resolution (JMR) in signal events are about 4-6%
in the electron channel and about 7-14% in the muon channel,
while the large-R jet energy resolution (JER) is about 3-5% GeV
in both channels. As opposed to the muon channel, in the electron
channel the large-R jet does contain the electron as a compact and
high energy deposit. This implies a more precise angular distribu-