985 Page 6 of 29 Eur. Phys. J. C (2019) 79 :985
gitudinal impact parameters of the track to 0.5 mm. For the
p+Pb analysis, the loose selection relaxes the requirements
on the transverse and longitudinal impact parameters of the
track to 2 mm and on the impact parameter significances
to less than 4. In the tight selection, the impact parame-
ter values and their significances must be less than 1 mm
and 2, respectively. For each of the two track selections the
absolute difference is calculated with respect to the baseline
measurement: |ρ(v
n
{2}
2
, [p
T
])
base
−ρ(v
n
{2}
2
, [p
T
])
loose
|or
|ρ(v
n
{2}
2
, [p
T
])
base
− ρ(v
n
{2}
2
, [p
T
])
tight
|. The largest dif-
ference is taken as a systematic uncertainty.
Detector material Since the tracks that are used in the cal-
culation of ρ(v
n
{2}
2
, [p
T
]) are weighted by the inverse of
the tracking efficiency, a bias in its estimation due to inac-
curate modelling of the material in the detector may change
the balance between low- and high-p
T
tracks in the sums.
Based on simulations, the estimated uncertainty in the detec-
tor description is obtained [43,44]. The resulting p
T
- and
η-dependent uncertainties in the track efficiency of up to 4%
are used to determine the systematic uncertainty.
Tracking azimuthal uniformity In this analysis, the weight-
ing factors w correct for any non-uniformity in the azimuthal
angle distribution of reconstructed tracks. The weights are
obtained from the data by requiring azimuthal uniformity
over the two-dimensional distribution of reconstructed tracks
in the η–φ plane. The effect of that correction on the result
is conservatively estimated by comparing the baseline mea-
surement and the measurement obtained without applying
this weight. The uncertainty is small, and it envelopes poten-
tial effects of imperfections in the weighting factors determi-
nation, including their dependence on the transverse momen-
tum, collision centrality, run-by-run differences, on dead
module maps or the vertex position.
Residual pile-up events The selection criteria discussed in
Sect. 3 suppress the fraction of pile-up events accepted for
analysis to almost zero in central Pb+Pb collisions. To esti-
mate the systematic uncertainty related to pile-up, the mea-
surement is conservatively repeated without this event rejec-
tion, resulting in at most a 1% difference in the most central
Pb+Pb events for the ρ(v
2
{2}
2
, [p
T
]) coefficient. The p +Pb
data were taken with higher pile-up than the Pb+Pb data.
To estimate the impact of contamination by residual pile-up
events, p+Pb results were obtained with only the vertex crite-
ria applied. The variation covers the estimated residual pile-
up fraction in events of the highest track multiplicity [36].
Centrality selection The minimum-bias trigger is fully effi-
cient for the 0–85% centrality interval. However, the total
fraction of inelastic Pb+Pb events selected is known only to
1% accuracy due to trigger inefficiency and possible sample
contamination in more peripheral interactions. The central-
ity is estimated using the E
FCal
T
distribution [6,10] and the
Glauber model [38] to obtain the mapping from the observed
E
FCal
T
to the number of nucleons participating in the col-
lision, N
part
. The modified PCC uncertainty is evaluated by
repeating the analysis with the altered centrality selections on
the E
FCal
T
distribution, which results in ±1% uncertainty
in the total fraction of inelastic Pb+Pb events. The centrality
selection contributes mainly to uncertainties for peripheral
collisions.
Figure 1 shows the magnitude of the systematic uncer-
tainties δρ(v
n
{2}
2
, [p
T
]) for n = 2 − 4 in Pb+Pb collisions
as a function of N
ch
. In Pb+Pb collisions, the systematic
uncertainty of the measured correlation coefficients across
different order harmonics and centralities is not dominated
by a single source. One of the largest uncertainties comes
from restoring the azimuthal uniformity, and dominates for
the second order harmonic in the most central collisions and
for the third and fourth order harmonics almost over the full
centrality range.Asizeable contributionto the uncertainty for
all three harmonics is due to the track selection. The impact
of the detector material is rather small except for a significant
contribution for the forth order harmonic in the most central
events. The residual pile-up in Pb+Pb collisions gives a negli-
gible contribution. Figure 1d shows systematic uncertainties
for ρ(v
2
{2}
2
, [p
T
]) coefficients in p+Pb collisions for the
main interval of 0.3 < p
T
< 2 GeV as a function of event
activity. In p+Pb interactions the largest uncertainty in the
most active collisions (N
ch
> 150) originates from pile-up.
The track selection is a source of sizeable uncertainty for this
collision system, while the azimuthal uniformity correction
procedure and the detector material have a small impact.
Details on the contributions to systematic uncertainties
from different sources of c
k
,Var
v
n
{2}
2
dyn
and
cov(v
n
{2}
2
, [p
T
]) are included in the Appendix.
6 Results
6.1 The constituents of the modified PCC
The constituents of the modified PCC, c
k
,Var
v
n
{2}
2
dyn
and cov(v
n
{2}
2
, [p
T
]) and are combined, using Eq. (4), to
obtain ρ. Figure 2 shows the dynamical p
T
fluctuation coef-
ficient c
k
as a function of charged-particle multiplicity in
Pb+Pb and p+Pb collision systems for tracks in three dif-
ferent p
T
intervals. A strong decrease of c
k
with increasing
N
ch
is observed in all measured results. A similar decrease
was seen for c
k
in Au+Au and Pb+Pb data at lower centre-
of-mass energies [28,29], evaluated for lower p
T
range,
0.15 < p
T
< 2 GeV, not accessible with the ATLAS detec-
tor. For the same N
ch
,thec
k
values differ by an order of
magnitude for different p
T
ranges of tracks used in the anal-
ysis. For the intervals with the same lower p
T
limit, the c
k
123