xviii Introduction
realizable. The delta modulator suppresses the low-frequency end of the signal spectrum,
which needs to be restored at the receiver end. This causes the dynamic range to decrease
with signal frequency and causes a cumulative error due to line noise.
It was proposed by Inose, Yasuda, and Murakami in 1962 [4] to add the loop filter to
the front end of a delta modulator and then move it inside the loop. For the simple case of
an integrator used as loop filter, the resulting system contained an integrator in the forward
path, followed by the (I-bit) quantizer, and the feedback loop contained only a I-bit digi-
tal-to-analog converter (DAC). Since this system contained a delta modulator and an inte-
grator, they named it a delta-sigma modulator, where the "sigma" denoted the summation
performed by the integrator. It was often called sigma-delta modulator by later workers.
Today, both names are in use. The output of the modulator contains the original input sig-
nal plus the first difference of the quantization error, as was the case for the error feedback
coder. Thus, both delta-sigma and error feedback coders are noise-shaping modulators.
They suppress the error in the baseband and thus achieve improved dynamic range across
this band independent of the signal frequency. The structure is free of the practical prob-
lems
of
the previous coders; the only component in the feedback loop is a l-bit DAC,
which can be made nearly ideal with careful design.
In the 34 years since its first description, the basic delta-sigma converter has been
modified many times and in many ways. The first important change was suggested in
1977 by Ritchie [5]. He proposed using several integrators in cascade in the forward path
to create a higher order loop filter, with each integrator receiving an additional input from
the DAC. The latter was needed to prevent instability. In an influential paper published in
1985 [6], Candy gave extensive design information on the double-integrator loop. Even
so, for more than two integrators in the loop, the stability was conditional and had to be
verified by numerical simulation. In 1987, Lee and Sodini gave design techniques for sta-
ble higher order loops [7, 8]. Based on these, delta-sigma ADCs with fourth- and
fifth-order loop filters containing several cascaded switched-capacitor (SC) integrators
and resonators have been successfully produced by several integrated circuit (IC) compa-
nies.
A different approach for the design of stable high-order delta-sigma ADCs was pro-
posed in 1986 by Hayashi et al. [9]. In their system (which they named MASH, for multi-
stage noise shaping) a single-integrator delta-sigma ADC processes the signal, and the
resulting large quantization error is converted by a second delta-sigma ADC into digital
data. The digital outputs of the two ADCs are combined through a digital stage that can-
cels the quantization error of the first ADC and differentiates the quantization error of the
second. The resulting digital signal contains a high-pass filtered replica of the quantization
error; the order of filtering is the sum of the orders of the two loop filters. To prevent the
leakage of unfiltered quantization noise to the output, the analog integrator in the first (sig-
nal) loop needs to function nearly ideally. This makes the practical realization somewhat
difficult. The principle can be extended to the realization of high-order converters, and
successful third- and fourth-order MASH ADCs have been reported.
Another way of enhancing the performance of a delta-sigma ADC is to use a multibit
internal quantizer. This, however, necessitates the inclusion of a multibit DAC in the feed-
back loop. The linearity of this DAC limits the linearity of the complete ADC, and hence
its design is a daunting task. Several techniques have been used to overcome this problem.
In 1989, Carley suggested the use of dynamic element matching to reduce the effect of