Physics Letters B 802 (2020) 135188
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Physics Letters B
www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb
Improved sensitivity to the CKM phase γ through binning phase space
in B
−
→ DK
−
, D → K
+
π
−
π
−
π
+
decays
T. Evans
a,∗
, J. Libby
b
, S. Malde
c
, G. Wilkinson
c
a
European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN), 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
b
Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India
c
University of Oxford, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Road, OX1 3RH, United Kingdom
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received
24 September 2019
Received
in revised form 20 December 2019
Accepted
24 December 2019
Available
online 6 January 2020
Editor:
L. Rolandi
Keywords:
Charm
decay
CP violation
A binning scheme is proposed for D → K
+
π
−
π
−
π
+
phase space that will improve the sensitivity of a
B
−
→ DK
−
analysis to the angle γ of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa Unitarity Triangle. The scheme
makes use of amplitude models recently reported by the LHCb collaboration. Assuming that a four-bin
scheme optimised on the models retains a similar sensitivity when applied in data, it is estimated that
the statistical uncertainty on γ from the B-meson sample so far collected by the LHCb experiment will
be as low as 5 degrees. This will be one of the most precise results available for any single decay mode
in a B
−
→ DK
−
measurement. Quantum-correlated D
¯
D data accumulated by the CLEO-c experiment are
analysed to provide first constraints on the coherence factors and average strong-phase differences in
the four bins, which are necessary inputs for the measurement. These constraints are compared with the
predictions of the model, and consequences for the measurement of γ are discussed.
© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP
3
.
1. Introduction
An important goal of flavour physics is to determine the an-
gle
γ = arg(−V
ud
V
∗
ub
/V
cd
V
∗
cb
) of the Cabibbo-Maskawa-Kobayashi
(CKM) Unitarity Triangle with the best possible precision. Sensi-
tivity
to this weak phase (also denoted φ
3
) can be obtained by
measuring CP -violating and associated observables in the decay
B
−
→ DK
−
, where D indicates a neutral charm meson recon-
structed
in a final state common to both D
0
and
¯
D
0
. (The inclusion
of charge-conjugate processes is implied throughout, unless oth-
erwise
stated.) First measurements of γ using this strategy were
performed at the B-factory experiments [1,2], but the most pre-
cise
ensemble of results now comes from the LHCb collaboration,
which has exploited a wide selection of D-decay modes
1
to estab-
lish
γ = (74.0
+5.0
−5.8
)
◦
[3]. This value is consistent with, but signifi-
cantly
less precise than the prediction of (65.6
+1.0
−3.4
)
◦
, which comes
from the knowledge of the sides and other angles of the Unitarity
Triangle [4], with a similar prediction in Ref. [5]. Hence more data
and new approaches are required to improve the precision of the
*
Corresponding author.
E-mail
address: timothy.david.evans@cern.ch (T. Evans).
1
Additional inputs to this result come from analogous strategies involving B
0
decays and from time-dependent B
0
s
and B
0
measurements.
direct measurement and to allow for more stringent tests of the
CKM paradigm.
One
input to the LHCb determination of γ is the measure-
ment
of observables involving D → K
+
π
−
π
−
π
+
decays, where
this mode is reconstructed inclusively as part of the B
−
→ DK
−
decay chain. Here there are contributions from both Cabibbo-
favoured
(CF) and doubly Cabibbo-suppressed (DCS) amplitudes in
the charm-meson decay, as well as favoured b → c and suppressed
b →u amplitudes in the B-meson decay, the net effect of which is
to introduce interference effects sensitive to γ [6]. There are four
possible decay configurations, with rates given by
(B
∓
→ (K
±
π
∓
π
∓
π
±
)
D
K
∓
)
∝ (
r
B
)
2
+(r
K 3π
D
)
2
+2r
B
r
K 3π
D
R
K 3π
cos (δ
B
+δ
K 3π
∓γ ) (1)
(B
∓
→ (K
∓
π
±
π
±
π
∓
)
D
K
∓
)
∝
1 + (r
B
r
K 3π
D
)
2
+2r
B
r
K 3π
D
R
K 3π
cos (δ
B
−δ
K 3π
∓γ ), (2)
where r
B
∼ 0.1is the absolute ratio of B
−
→
¯
D
0
K
−
to B
−
→
D
0
K
−
amplitudes. The phase difference between these two am-
plitudes
is (δ
B
− γ ), where δ
B
is a CP -conserving strong phase.
(These expressions neglect small corrections from D
0
¯
D
0
mixing,
which can be included in a straightforward manner [7].)
The
other parameters in Eqs. (1) and (2)relate to the phase-
space
averaged contribution of intermediate hadronic resonances
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135188
0370-2693/
© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by
SCOAP
3
.