always being produced and others dissolved. They vary in duration from one or
two days to thirty or forty. For the most part they are of most irregular shape, and
their shapes continually change, some quickly and violently, others more slowly
and moderately.
They also vary in darkness, appearing sometimes to condense and sometimes to
spread out and rarefy. In addition to changing shape, some of them divide into
three or four, and often several unite into one; this happens less at the edge of the
sun's disk than in its central parts. Besides all these disordered movements they
have in common a general uniform motion across the face of the sun in parallel
lines. From special characteristics of this motion one may learn that the sun is
absolutely spherical, that it rotates from west to east around its own center, carries
the spots along with it in parallel circles, and completes an entire revolution in
about one lunar month. Also worth noting is the fact that the spots always fall
in one zone of the solar body, lying between the two circles which bound the
declinations of the planets - that is, they fall within 28° or 29° of the sun's equator.
The different densities and degrees of darkness of the spots, their changes of shape,
and their collecting and separating are evident directly to our sight, without any
need of reasoning, as a glance at the diagrams which I am enclosing will show. But
that the spots are contiguous to the sun and are carried around by its rotation can
only be deduced and concluded by reasoning from certain particular events which
our observations yield.
First, to see twenty or thirty spots at a time move with one common movement is
a strong reason for believing that each does not go wandering about by itself, in the
manner of the planets going around the sun. . . . To begin with, the spots at their
first appearance and final disappearance near the edges of the sun generally seem to
have very little breadth, but to have the same length that they show in the central
parts of the sun's disk. Those who understand what is meant by foreshortening on
a spherical surface will see this to be a manifest argument that the sun is a globe,
that the spots are close to its surface, and that as they are carried on that surface
toward the center they will always grow in breadth while preserving the same
length. . . . this maximum thinning, it is clear, takes place at the point of greatest
foreshortening....
I have since been much impressed by the courtesy of nature, which thousands of
years ago arranged a means by which we might come to notice these spots, and
through them to discover things of greater consequence. For without any instru-
ments, from any little hole through which sunlight passes, there emerges an image
of the sun with its spots, and at a distance this becomes stamped upon any surface
opposite the hole. It is true that these spots are not nearly as sharp as those seen
through the telescope, but the majority of them may nevertheless be seen. If in
church some day Your Excellency sees the light of the sun falling upon the pave-
ment at a distance from some broken window pane, you may catch this light upon
a flat white sheet of paper, and there you will perceive the spots. I might add that
nature has been so kind that for our instruction she has sometimes marked the sun
with a spot so large and dark as to be seen merely by the naked eye, though the
false and inveterate idea that the heavenly bodies are devoid of all mutation or al-
teration has made people believe that such a spot was the planet Mercury coming
between us and the sun, to the disgrace of past astronomers.
12
12
Galileo Galilei, History and Demonstrations
Concerning Sunspots and Their Phenomena
(Rome, 1613), translated by Stillman Drake,
Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo (Garden
City, New York, 1957), pp. 106-107, 116-
117. Galileo had been through all this once
before when he first saw craters on the
moon, another supposedly perfect celestial
sphere. One of Galileo's opponents, "who
admitted the surface of the moon looked
rugged, maintained that it was actually
quite smooth and spherical as Aristotle had
said, reconciling the two ideas by saying
that the moon was covered with a smooth
transparent material through which moun-
tains and craters inside it could be discerned.
Galileo, sarcastically applauding the ingenu-
ity of this contribution, offered to accept it
gladly — provided that his opponent would
do him the equal courtesy of allowing him
then to assert that the moon was even more
rugged than he had thought before, its sur-
face being covered with mountains and
craters of this invisible substance ten times
as high as any he had seen. At Pisa the
leading philosopher had refused even to look
through the telescope; when he died a few
months afterward, Galileo expressed the
hope that since he had neglected to look at
the new celestial objects while on earth, he
would now see them on his way to hea-
ven." Stillman Drake, "Introduction: Sec-
ond Part," Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo
(Garden City, New York, 1957), p. 73.
20 ENVISIONING INFORMATION