3
Then, we first review the multiplexing capacity of deter-
ministic MIMO channels with antenna-space multiplexing. For
antenna-space multiplexing, the capacity for single user with
time-invariant channel is
P
n
min
i=1
log
2
1 +
p
∗
i
µ
2
i
N
0
bits/s/Hz,
where n
min
:= min(N
t
, N
r
) and µ
i
is the i-th singular
value (descending order) of channel H that represents the
spatial channel with N
t
transmit antennas and N
r
receive
antennas; N
0
denotes the noise power at the receiver and
p
∗
1
, . . . , p
∗
k
are the allocated power for spatial parallel sub-
channels determined by water-filling [8]. At high SNR, equal
power allocation policy is the asymptotically optimal, the
capacity can be derived by
C
ant−space
≈
k
X
i=1
log
2
1 +
P
total
µ
2
i
kN
0
(1)
≈ k log
2
(SNR) +
k
X
i=1
log
2
µ
2
i
k
bits/s/Hz.
where SNR = P
total
/N
0
and k also denotes the number of
spatial degrees of freedom offered by multiple antennas.
With beam-space multiplexing, the received signal vector
at the receiver can be expressed as y = HVs + n, where
V ∈ C
N
t
×r
is the optimal beamforming matrix with r beams
such that the spatial multiplexing shifts to beam domain from
antenna domain, and n is the additive noise at the receiver.
When r = 1, it is traditional beamforming. Then, the capacity
is C
beam
= log
2
(1 + SNR µ
2
1
) such that high power efficiency
is gained. Assuming the effective channel HV has r non-zero
singular values, and r ≤ k. Similarly, the achievable capacity
can be written as
C
beam−space
≈ r log
2
(SNR) +
r
X
i=1
log
2
µ
2
i
r
bits/s/Hz. (2)
As a result, we can see that the receive SNR can be improved
without extra power consumption while multiplexing gain
could also be achieved by beam-space multiplexing.
B. Comparison of CSI Acquisition Between TDD and FDD
In order to align beam to each spatial data piece of beam-
space multiplexing accurately, CSI should be acquired at
the BS before the transmission. In FDD systems, CSI can
be obtained through reference signal training and quantized
feedback. However, the performance is limited by several non-
ideal factors, such as feedback delay, quantization error, and
imperfect CSI estimation at user side. This will lead to the
engineering implementation challenge due to heavy overhead
of real-time feedback. The limitation becomes extremely se-
vere in 5G, where the number of antennas in the BS is large
and the reference signal symbols are limited. The required
independent reference signal symbols are proportional to the
number of antennas at the BS. The number of available
reference signal symbols is fundamentally limited by the
channel coherence time. Thus, the reference signal symbols
will become insufficient for accurate channel estimation in
FDD systems with large number of antennas at the BS.
Recently, compressed sensing (CS)-based channel estima-
tion methods have been proposed to reduce the reference signal
overhead for FDD massive MIMO systems, e.g., orthogonal
matching pursuit (OMP) and least absolute shrinkage and
16 32 64 128 256
Number of transmit antennas at BS
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Gflops
TDD with 10 UEs
TDD with 50 UEs
FDD
Fig. 2: Computational complexity of CSI estimation for TDD
and FDD systems.
selection operator (LASSO) algorithm [9]. It has shown
that the massive MIMO channel usually exhibits abundant
sparsity in certain transformed domains due to limited local
scatters in physical environments. However, there are some
drawbacks for the CS-based algorithms. For example, group
sparsity and other sparse structure in the different domains
are not well exploited. This is because of the limitation of
the solution for the CS optimization problem. To overcome
this problem, a structured compressing sensing (SCS)-based
spatio-temporal joint channel estimation scheme is proposed
to reduce the required pilot overhead, whereby the spatio-
temporal common sparsity of delay-domain MIMO channels
is leveraged. Moreover, the design of non-orthogonal pilot
for CS-based adaptive CSI acquisition for improving channel
estimation performance.
Alternatively, in TDD systems, channel reciprocity property
can be utilized for CSI acquisition. The pilot overhead for CSI
estimation in TDD massive MIMO systems is only propor-
tional to the number of users. Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 2,
in contrast to FDD systems, the computational complexity for
CSI estimation in TDD system is relatively much lower [10].
However, strictly synchronization and antenna calibration are
required to guarantee the channel reciprocity. This is because
reciprocity holds only in air channel between the BS and
user side. If the transceiver of BS and users are considered,
downlink and uplink channels are no longer reciprocal. Thus,
in practice, calibration is needed to restore channel reciprocity.
Recently, user-assisted calibration is an enabling technology
for TDD massive MIMO in 5G, which yields fast calibration
processing with low overhead and high calibration accuracy.
It is expected that more efficient calibration algorithms can be
emerged such that the multi-fold gain of massive MIMO in
TDD network can be fully realized.
C. Comparison of Engineering Implementation
We compare the beam-space multiplexing with the tradi-
tional antenna-space multiplexing by considering the prac-
tical engineering implementation constraints. For practical
implementation with antenna-space spatial multiplexing, large-
spaced (i.e., 4 ∼ 10λ) two and four antennas were used
to provide enough decorrelation of multiple antenna signals,