凸优化：斯蒂芬·博伊德与列文·范登伯格的著作

需积分: 10 123 浏览量更新于2024-07-24 收藏 7.77MB PDF 举报

"《凸优化》是斯蒂芬·博伊德(Stephen Boyd)和利文·范登伯格(Lieven Vandenberghe)合著的一本关于凸优化的学术著作，由剑桥大学出版社出版。这本书深入探讨了凸优化理论及其在工程、计算机科学和数学等领域的应用。" 《凸优化》是优化理论的一个重要分支，它研究的是在满足一系列凸条件下的最优化问题。凸优化问题的特点在于其解具有全局最优性，即如果一个解是最优的，那么它就是全局最优解，而不仅仅是局部最优解。这对于许多实际问题来说是非常重要的，因为它可以避免陷入局部最优，从而找到真正意义上的最佳解决方案。在书中，作者博伊德和范登伯格赫详细阐述了凸集、凸函数的基础概念，这些是凸优化的核心。他们解释了如何识别和构建凸函数，并讨论了各种类型的凸函数，如线性函数、二次函数和仿射函数。此外，书中的内容还涵盖了凸优化问题的标准形式，如线性规划、二次规划以及更复杂的锥规划。书中还深入讨论了凸优化的算法，包括梯度下降法、拟牛顿法和内点法等。这些算法不仅描述了它们的理论基础，还给出了实现这些算法的具体步骤和示例，使得读者能够理解和应用到实际问题中。作者强调了数值稳定性和计算效率在实际应用中的重要性。除了基本理论和算法，书中还涉及了凸优化在信号处理、控制理论、统计学习、机器学习等多个领域的应用实例。这些实例展示了凸优化在解决实际问题时的强大能力，同时也为读者提供了将理论知识转化为实际工具的方法。《凸优化》一书适合对优化理论有需求的研究生、科研人员和工程师阅读，它提供了一个全面且深入的视角来理解和应用凸优化。无论你是初次接触这个领域，还是已经有一定基础，都可以从这本书中获益匪浅。通过学习和掌握凸优化，读者可以解决那些在传统优化方法中可能变得复杂或难以求解的问题，从而在各自的领域中实现更高效和精确的决策。

2 1 Introduction

for all x, y ∈ R

and all α, β ∈ R with α + β =1,α ≥ 0, β ≥ 0. Comparing (1.3)

and (1.2), we see that convexity is more general than linearity: inequality replaces

the more r estrictive equality, and the inequality must hold only for certain values

of α and β. Since any linear program is therefore a convex optimization problem,

we can consider convex optimization to be a generalization of linear programming.

1.1.1 Applications

The optimization problem (1.1) is an abstraction of the problem of making the best

possible choice of a vector in R

from a set of candidate choices. The variable x

represents the choice made; the constraints f

(x) ≤ b

represent ﬁrm requirements

or speciﬁcations that limit the possible choices, and the objective value f

(x) rep-

resents the cost of choosing x. (We can also think of −f

(x) as representing the

value, or utility, of choosing x.) A solution of the optimization problem (1.1) corre-

sponds to a choice that has minimum cost (or maximum utility), among all choices

that meet the ﬁr m requirements.

In portfolio optimization, for example, we seek the best way to invest some

capital in a set of n assets. The variable x

represents the investment in the ith

asset, so the vector x ∈ R

describes the overall portfolio allocation across the set of

assets. The constraints might represent a limit on the budget (i.e., a limit on the

total amount to be invested), the requirement that investments are nonnegative

(assuming short positions are not allowed), and a minimum acceptable value of

expected return for the whole portfolio. The objective or cost function might be

a measure of the overall risk or variance of the portfolio return. In this case,

the optimization problem (1.1) corresponds to choosing a portfolio allocation that

minimizes risk, among all possible allocations that meet the ﬁrm requirements.

Another example is device sizing in electronic design, which is the task of choos-

ing the width and length of each device in an electronic circuit. Here the variables

represent the widths and lengths of the devices. The constraints represent a va-

riety of engineering requirements, such as limits on the device sizes imposed by

the manufacturing process, timing requirements that ensure that the circuit can

operate reliably at a speciﬁed speed, and a limit on the total area of the circuit. A

common objective in a device sizing problem is the total power consumed by the

circuit. The optimization problem (1.1) is to ﬁnd the device sizes that satisfy the

design requirements (on manufacturability, timing, and area) and are most power

eﬃcient.

In data ﬁtting, the task is to ﬁnd a model, from a family of potential models,

that best ﬁts some observed data and prior information. Here the variables are the

parameters in the model, and the constraints can represent prior information or

required limits on the parameters (such as nonnegativity). The objective function

might be a measure of misﬁt or prediction error between the observed data and

the values predicted by the model, or a statistical measure of the unlikeliness or

implausibility of the parameter values. The optimization problem (1.1) is to ﬁnd

the model parameter values that are consistent with the prior information, and give

the smallest misﬁt or prediction error with the observed data (or, in a statistical

1.1 Mathematical optimization 3

framework, are most likely).

An amazing variety of practical problems involving decision making (or system

design, analysis, and operation) can b e cast in the form of a mathematical opti-

mization problem, or some variation such as a multicriterion optimization problem.

Indeed, mathematical optimization has become an imp ortant tool in many areas.

It is widely used in engineering, in electronic design automation, automatic con-

trol systems, and optimal design problems arising in civil, chemical, mechanical,

and aerospace engineering. Optimization is used for problems arising in network

design and operation, ﬁnance, supply chain management, scheduling, and many

other areas. The list of applications is still steadily expanding.

For most of these applications, mathematical optimization is used as an aid to

a human decision maker, system designer, or system operator, who supervises the

process, checks the results, and modiﬁes the problem (or the solution approach)

when necessary. This human decision maker also carries out any actions suggested

by the optimization problem, e.g., buying or selling assets to achieve the optimal

portfolio.

A relatively recent phenomenon opens the possibility of many other applications

for mathematical optimization. With the proliferation of computers embedded in

products, we have seen a rapid growth in embedded optimization. In these em-

bedded applications, optimization is used to automatically make real-time choices,

and even carry out the associated actions, with no (or little) human intervention or

oversight. In some application areas, this blending of traditional automatic control

systems and embedded optimization is well under way; in others, it is just start-

ing. Embedded real-time optimization raises some new challenges: in particular,

it requires solution methods that are extremely reliable, and solve problems in a

predictable amount of time (and memory).

1.1.2 Solving optimization problems

A solution method for a class of optimization problems is an algorithm that com-

putes a solution of the problem (to some given accuracy), given a particular problem

from the class, i.e., an instance of the problem. Since the late 1940s, a large eﬀort

has gone into developing algorithms for solving various classes of optimization prob-

lems, analyzing their properties, and developing good software implementations.

The eﬀectiveness of these algorithms, i.e., our ability to solve the optimization prob-

lem (1.1), varies considerably, and depends on factors such as the particular forms

of the objective and constraint functions, how many variables and constraints there

are, and special structure, such as sparsity. (A problem is sparse if each constraint

function depends on only a small number of the variables).

Even when the objective and constraint functions are smooth (for example,

polynomials) the general optimization problem (1.1) is surprisingly diﬃcult to solve.

Approaches to the general problem therefore involve some kind of compromise, such

as very long computation time, or the possibility of not ﬁnding the solution. Some

of these methods are discussed in §1.4.

There are, however, some important exceptions to the general rule that most

optimization problems are diﬃcult to solve. For a few problem classes we have

4 1 Introduction

eﬀective algorithms that can reliably solve even large problems, with hundreds or

thousands of variables and constraints. Two important and well known examples,

described in §1.2 below (and in detail in chapter 4), are least-squares problems and

linear programs. It is less well known that convex optimization is another exception

to the rule: Like least-squares or linear programming, there are very eﬀective

algorithms that can reliably and eﬃciently solve even large convex problems.

1.2 Least-squares and linear programming

In this section we describe two very widely known and used special subclasses of

convex optimization: least-squares and linear programming. (A complete technical

treatment of these problems will be given in chapter 4.)

1.2.1 Least-squares problems

A least-squares problem is an optimization problem with no constraints (i.e., m =

0) and an objective which is a sum of squares of terms of the form a

x − b

minimize f

(x)=&Ax − b&

i=1

x − b

)

(1.4)

Here A ∈ R

k×n

(with k ≥ n), a

are the rows of A, and the vector x ∈ R

is the

optimization variable.

Solving least-squares problems

The solution of a least-squares problem (1.4) can be reduced to solving a set of

linear equations,

A)x = A

so we have the analytical solution x =(A

−1

b. For least-squares problems

we have good algorithms (and software implementations) for solving the problem to

high accuracy, with very high reliability. The least-squares problem can be solved

in a time approximately proportional to n

k, with a known constant. A current

desktop computer can solve a least-squares problem with hundreds of variables, and

thousands of terms, in a few seconds; more powerful computers, of course, can s olve

larger problems, or the same size problems, faster. (Moreover, these solution times

will decrease exponentially in the future, according to Moore’s law.) Algorithms

and software for solving least-squares problems are reliable enough for embedded

optimization.

In many cases we can solve even larger least-squares problems, by exploiting

some special structure in the coeﬃcient matrix A. Suppose, for example, that the

matrix A is sparse, which means that it has far fewer than kn nonzero entries. By

exploiting sparsity, we can usually solve the least-squares problem much faster than

order n

k. A current desktop computer can solve a sparse least-squares problem

1.2 Least-squares and linear programming 5

with tens of thousands of variables, and hundreds of thousands of terms, in around

a minute (although this depends on the particular sparsity pattern).

For extremely large problems (say, with millions of variables), or for problems

with exacting real-time computing requirements, solving a least-squares problem

can be a challenge. But in the vast majority of cases, we can say that existing

methods are very eﬀective, and extremely reliable. Indeed, we can say that solving

least-squares problems (that are not on the boundary of what is currently achiev-

able) is a (mature) technology, that can be reliably used by many people who do

not know, and do not need to know, the details.

Using least-squares

The least-squares problem is the basis for regression analysis, optimal control, and

many parameter estimation and data ﬁtting methods. It has a number of statistical

interpretations, e.g., as maximum likelihood estimation of a vector x, given linear

measurements corrupted by Gaussian measurement errors.

Recognizing an optimization problem as a least-squares problem is straightfor-

ward; we only need to verify that the objective is a quadratic function (and then

test whether the associated quadratic form is positive semideﬁnite). While the

basic least-squares problem has a simple ﬁxed form, several standard techniques

are used to increase its ﬂexibility in applications.

In weighted least-squares, the weighted least-squares cost

i=1

x − b

)

where w

,...,w

are positive, is minimized. (This problem is readily cast and

solved as a standard least-squares problem.) Here the weights w

are chosen to

reﬂect diﬀering levels of concern about the sizes of the terms a

x − b

, or simply

to inﬂuence the solution. In a statistical setting, weighted least-squares arises

in estimation of a vector x, given linear measurements corrupted by errors with

unequal variances.

Another technique in least-squares is regularization, in which extra terms are

added to the cost function. In the simplest case, a positive multiple of the sum of

squares of the variables is added to the cost function:

i=1

x − b

)

+ ρ

i=1

where ρ > 0. (This problem too can be formulated as a standard least-squares

problem.) The extra terms penalize large values of x, and result in a sensible

solution in cases when minimizing the ﬁrst sum only does not. The parameter ρ is

chosen by the user to give the r ight trade-oﬀ between making the original objective

function

i=1

x−b

)

small, while keeping

i=1

not too big. Regularization

comes up in statistical estimation when the vector x to be estimated is given a prior

distribution.

Weighted least-squares and regularization are covered in chapter 6; their sta-

tistical interpretations are given in chapter 7.

6 1 Introduction

1.2.2 Linear programming

Another important class of optimization problems is linear programming, in which

the objective and all constraint functions are linear:

minimize c

subject to a

x ≤ b

,i=1,...,m.

(1.5)

Here the vectors c, a

,...,a

∈ R

and scalars b

,...,b

∈ R are problem pa-

rameters that specify the objective and constraint functions.

Solving linear programs

There is no simple analytical formula for the solution of a linear program (as there

is for a least-squares problem), but there are a variety of very eﬀective methods for

solving them, including Dantzig’s simplex method, and the more recent interior-

point methods described later in this book. While we cannot give the exact number

of arithmetic operations required to solve a linear program (as we can for least-

squares), we can establish rigorous bounds on the number of operations required

to solve a linear program, to a given accuracy, using an interior-point method. The

complexity in practice is order n

m (assuming m ≥ n) but with a constant that is

less well characterized than for least-squares. These algorithms are quite reliable,

although perhaps not quite as reliable as methods for least-squares. We can easily

solve problems with hundreds of variables and thousands of constraints on a small

desktop computer, in a matter of seconds. If the problem is sparse, or has some

other exploitable structure, we can often solve problems with tens or hundreds of

thousands of variables and constraints.

As with least-squares problems, it is still a challenge to solve extremely large

linear programs, or to solve linear programs with exacting real-time computing re-

quirements. But, like least-squares, we can say that solving (most) linear programs

is a mature technology. Linear programming solvers can be (and are) embedded in

many tools and applications.

Using linear programming

Some applications lead directly to linear programs in the form (1.5), or one of

several other standard forms. In many other cases the original optimization prob-

lem does not have a standard linear program form, but can be transformed to an

equivalent linear program (and then, of course, solved) using techniques covered in

detail in chapter 4.

As a simple example, consider the Chebyshev approximation problem:

minimize max

i=1,...,k

x − b

(1.6)

Here x ∈ R

is the variable, and a

,...,a

∈ R

, b

,...,b

∈ R are parameters

that specify the problem instance. Note the resemblance to the least-squares prob-

lem (1.4). For both problems, the objective is a measure of the size of the terms

x − b

. In least-squares, we use the sum of squares of the terms as objective,

whereas in Chebyshev approximation, we use the maximum of the absolute values.

剩余729页未读，继续阅读

hhuant

粉丝: 0
资源: 1

凸优化：斯蒂芬·博伊德与列文·范登伯格的著作

凸优化算法：Convex Optimization 介绍

Stephen Boyd & Lieven Vandenberghe的(Convex Optimization)英文原版

深度学习中的非凸优化：Non-convex Optimization for Machine Learning

Convex Optimization

斯坦福大学凸优化教材：Convex Optimization精髓解读

斯坦福大学经典教材：凸优化Convex Optimization

8.18发烧购物节活动SOP - 电商日化行业+电商引流转化（5张子表全案）.xlsx

网页设计期末大作业基于HTML+CSS的仿中国银行网站源代码.zip

ntu嵌入式所有周实验文件

WordPress子比AI自动发文章插件AI辅助写作随更版wapai-ai-create.zip

最新资源