468 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 68, NO. 1, JANUARY 2020
optimal backscatter antenna selection scheme, that maximizes
the detection probability. Finally, simulation results are pro-
vided in Section V and conclusions are drawn in Section VI.
D. Notations
Scalars, vectors, and matrices are denoted by lowercase,
boldface lowercase, and boldface uppercase letters, respec-
tively. The Euclidean norm, statistical expectation, transpose,
and the Hermitian transpose are represented by ·
2
, E(·),
(·)
T
,and(·)
H
, respectively. The matrix I
N
represents the
N × N identity matrix. We denote the ith element of the
vector y as [y]
i
and the (i, j)th element of the matrix Y as
[Y]
i,j
. The set of real-valued M × N matrices is denoted
by R
M×N
and R
M×1
= R
M
. The car dinality of the set
A is |A| and the ith element of the set is A(i).Weuse
N(μ, σ
2
) or CN (μ, σ
2
), χ
2
d
and χ
2
d
(τ) to indicate the real or
complex Gaussian distribution with mean μ and variance σ
2
,
the central chi-squared distribution with degrees of freed om d,
and the non-central chi-squared distribution with the degrees
of freedom d and the noncen trality par a meter τ, respectively.
II. S
YSTEM MODEL
We consider an ambient system composed of an RF source,
a single-antenna read er and a multi-antenna tag (Fig. 1). We
assume that the tag is equipped with K (K ≥ 2) antennas.
These K antennas are divided into two sets: one set with M
(1 <M≤ K) antennas is for backscattering, and the other
set with K − M antennas is for wireless energy harvesting.
Thus, these two tasks occur simultaneously and independently.
In other words, the RF signals received by energy-harvesting
antennas are reserved purely for powering the circuit, while
the RF signals received by the active backscatter antennas are
entirely devoted to backscattering. We denote the whole can-
didate antenna set as A = {1, 2,...,K} and the backscatter
antenna set as S = { κ
1
,κ
2
,...,κ
M
},whereS⊆A.
Let h denote the channel between the RF source and the
reader. Let the channels from the antenna κ
m
∈Sof the
tag to the RF source and the reader be f
κ
m
and g
κ
m
,where
1 ≤ m ≤ M . Let the RF source transmit complex Gaussian
random signal x(n) with tran smitted power P
s
. The signal
received at the antenna κ
m
∈Sis given by [10]
r
m
(n)=f
κ
m
x(n). (1)
This antenna then backscatters the signal r
m
(n) and transmits
its own binary signal B. Specifically, B =0indicates that
the tag changes its impedance so that solely a relatively very
small amount of the RF signal is reflected, and B =1implies
that the tag switches the impedance so as to backscatter some
of the RF signal. Consequently, the backscattered signal by
the antenna κ
m
∈Sis
r
m
b
(n)=αBr
m
(n), (2)
where α ∈ [0, 1] represents the attenuation inside the tag,
which is achieved by adjusting the load impedance at the port
of the antenna, and also depends on the structure mode of the
antenna [36], [37]. It determines the amount of the incident RF
Fig. 2. GBS of the tag in one time slot: (a) N RF signals received by the
tag, (b) backscattered signals by M backscatter antennas.
signals to be backscattered [38]. Finally, the received signal at
the reader can be expressed as
y(n)=hx(n)+g
κ
m
r
m
b
(n)+ω(n)
=
hx(n)+ω(n),B=0,
(h + αf
κ
m
g
κ
m
)x(n)+ω(n),B=1,
(3)
where ω(n) ∼CN(0,σ
2
0
) is additive white Gaussian
noise (AWGN) at the r eader.
Because the data r ate of the tag is m uch lower than that of
the RF source, i.e., the tag signal B remains unchanged during
N consecutive x(n) in one time slot, we divide the N RF
signals in one time slot into M sets, where the mth set contains
an arbitrary number of signals N
m
such that
M
m=1
N
m
= N .
As Fig. 2 shows, the mth set is given by
x
m
=[x
m
(1),x
m
(2),...,x
m
(N
m
)]
T
, (4)
where 1 ≤ m ≤ M .
When the tag receives the mth RF signal set, the mth
backscatter antenna κ
m
is active and reflects these RF signals;
in other words, only one antenna is selected at one time for
backscattering due to limited power. While the other K − 1
antennas are all connected to the energy harvester, and collect
energy from both the RF signals and the backscattered signals
of the antenna κ
m
∈S.
1
According the references [40], [41], the energy harvesting
efficiency depends on the value of load impedance in the
matching network, which is connected to the multiple antennas
to transfer maximum power from the antennas to the rectifier.
As well, the rectifier is equipped with multiple diodes, which
leads to nonlinear RF-to-DC conversion. Clearly, the energy
harvester is then a nonlinear device.
2
The energy captured
by both the K − M antennas dedicated to wireless energy
harvesting and the M −1 silent backscatter antennas provides
the p ower required for the backscatter communication w ith the
antenna κ
m
∈S.
1
The amount of harvested energy is typically on the order of micro-watts
when the battery-free tags locate close to the RF source, such as TV tower
with transmit power 10
6
W [42]. Thus, the harvested energy is sufficient for
powering the analog components of the ambient backscatter devices, which
consume 0.79 μWto2 mW [2], [38].
2
Since the energy harvester and the transmitter operate independently and
simultaneously, the energy harvesting model has no effect on the backscattered
signal (2) by the backscatter antennas, and the received signal at the reader (3).
We only focus on the detector design in our work.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Singapore University of Technology & Design. Downloaded on March 25,2020 at 12:05:44 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.