Eur. Phys. J. C (2017) 77 :445 Page 3 of 15 445
where α = α
π
2
6
, F = d ∧ A is the field strength of the
vector field and −
1
4
G
μν
G
μν
is a dilaton-independent term
of flux fields, assumed condensed (...), which is induced
by the bulk geometry and serves the purpose of keeping any
cosmological-constant terms on the brane universe in the cur-
rent era (we are interested in here) positive and small, in
accordance to observations [29]. We shall define the various
other quantities appearing in Eq. (2.1) below.
An important point we would like to stress is that the action
(2.1) is derived by string world-sheet conformal invariance
considerations in the framework of Lorentz and U(1) invari-
ant vector fields A
μ
,asdiscussedin[13,20]. Any breaking
of the Lorentz or U(1) invariance (by the constraint over the
vector field) is understood as spontaneous, hence the stan-
dard Maxwell kinetic terms for the vector field, which from
a string perspective is a constraint gauge field in a gauged
fixed setting. This stems from the fact that in our world-sheet
logarithmic conformal field theory to D-particle recoil [33],
the recoil is described in terms of appropriate open-string
world-sheet vertex operators of the vector field A
μ
(cf. (2.6)
below) which are invariant under a U(1) gauge transforma-
tion of A
μ
in target space by construction, A
μ
→ A
μ
+∂
μ
θ.
Details are given in [13,20].
We consider constant dilaton fields φ = φ
0
in the galactic
era and weak recoil fields
√
α
A
μ
1 (appropriate for late
eras of the universe), in which case the above action is well
approximated by (in the Einstein frame with respect to the
dilaton φ)[13]
S
E
eff 4D
=
d
4
x
√
−g
1
2
M
2
Pl
+
αe
−2φ
0
˜
F
μν
˜
F
μν
4
R −
0
−
1
4
G
μν
G
μν
−
1
4
˜
F
μν
˜
F
μν
+ λ
˜
A
μ
˜
A
μ
+
1
α
J
+ S
m
, (2.2)
with
α = α
π
2
6
, J ≡
(2πα
)
2
T
3
e
3φ
0
g
s0
,
1
2
M
2
Pl
≡
1
16π G
=
α T
3
e
φ
0
g
s0
+
1
κ
2
0
,
0
≡
T
3
e
3φ
0
g
s0
+
˜
e
2φ
0
κ
2
0
. (2.3)
The tilded vector field
˜
A
μ
in the action (2.2), as compared
to the original action (2.1), results from an appropriate nor-
malisation so that the vector field appears with a canonical
(Maxwell) term for its field strength
˜
F
μν
. The quantity λ is
a Lagrange multiplier field implementing the constraint on
the recoil-velocity field stemming from its interpretation as
a velocity four-vector field [20],
2
M
Pl
= 2.4 × 10
18
GeV
is the reduced Planck mass in four space-time dimensions
(on our brane universe),
˜
is a bulk cosmological constant,
which can be constrained (cf. discussion below Eq. (2.4))
by means of the dilaton equation of motion, T
3
> 0isthe
three-brane universe tension, α
= M
−2
s
is the Regge slope,
with M
s
the string scale, and g
s0
the string coupling. For
the rest of this work we assume the phenomenological value
g
2
s0
/(4π) = 1/20, that is, g
s0
∼ 0.8, for which string pertur-
bation theory is valid. Moreover, the reader should recall [13]
that, under the assumptions that
˜
F
μν
˜
F
μν
is almost constant
and α R M
2
Pl
, which are appropriate for late eras of the
universe we are interested in here, the dilaton equation of
motion in the action (2.2) leads to an expression of
˜
in
terms of the brane tension T
3
, which can be used to obtain
0
−
1
2
T
3
e
3φ
0
g
s0
< 0. (2.4)
This anti-de Sitter type cosmological constant would not be
phenomenologically acceptable in the current era, as it would
defy the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), Baryon
Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) and gravitational lensing data.
To remedy this fact we assume [13] that contributions from
bulk flux gauge fields G
μν
(which condense) and distant (to
the brane) D-particles amount to a positive cosmological-
constant type vacuum-energy contribution that fine tunes the
negative cosmological constant (2.4) to an acceptably small
positive amount in the current era. This assumption will be
understood in what follows in the sense that
vac
≡
0
+
1
8
G
μν
G
μν
+···> 0, (2.5)
where ··· denote other bulk D-particle contributions to the
brane vacuum energy, so that
vac
is compatible with the
bounds on the cosmological constant from observations in
2
For completeness we remark that the vector field is expressed in terms
of the recoil four velocity as [13,20]
A
μ
=
1
√
α
g
μν
(t)u
ν
,
where g
μν
(t) = C(η(t))η
μν
is the background cosmological FLRW
metric, with η(t) the conformal time, and C(η) = a
2
(t) as standard.
In this background the velocity field satisfies the standard constraint
u
μ
u
ν
g
μν
=−1, which implies the constraint A
μ
A
ν
g
μν
=−
1
α
. Upon
appropriately normalising the Maxwell kinetic term in the action (2.1),
by redefining the vector field as
A
μ
→
˜
A
μ
=
(2πα
)
2
T
3
e
3φ
0
g
s0
A
μ
,
one obtains a canonical Maxwell term for the field
˜
A
μ
and the pertinent
constraint implemented by the Lagrange multiplier field λ as given in
(2.2). For details we refer the reader to [13,20].
123