Physics Letters B 767 (2017) 199–204
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Physics Letters B
www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb
Naturalness in see-saw mechanism and Bogoliubov transformation
Kazuo Fujikawa
a,b
, Anca Tureanu
a,∗
a
Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
b
Quantum Hadron Physics Laboratory, RIKEN Nishina Center, Wako 351-0198, Japan
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received
4 January 2017
Accepted
29 January 2017
Available
online 1 February 2017
Editor: J.
Hisano
We present an alternative perspective on the see-saw mechanism for the neutrino mass, according to
which the small neutrino mass is given as a difference of two large masses. This view emerges when an
analogue of the Bogoliubov transformation is used to describe Majorana neutrinos in the Lagrangian of
the see-saw mechanism, which is analogous to the BCS theory. The Bogoliubov transformation clarifies
the natural appearance of Majorana fermions when C is strongly violated by the right-handed neutrino
mass term with good CP in the single flavor model. Analyzing typical models with m
R
=10
4
to 10
15
GeV,
it is shown that a hitherto unrecognized fine tuning of the order m
ν
/m
R
=10
−15
to 10
−26
is required to
make the commonly perceived see-saw mechanism work in a natural setting, namely, when none of the
dimensionless coupling constants are very small.
© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP
3
.
1. Introduction
When one discusses the natural appearance of the observed
very small neutrino masses [1], one often refers to the see-saw
mechanism [2–4] the precise form of which depends on specific
models [5]. Those models are characterized by a very large mass
scale and thus the natural appearance of the tiny neutrino mass is
rather surprising. Naturalness is an esthetic notion and thus sub-
jective,
and it should ultimately be determined by experiments.
Currently active search for the support of the see-saw mechanism
in the form of Majorana neutrinos is going, and we expect that this
esthetical issue will be tested soon by experiments.
It
may also be appropriate to examine the naturalness of the
see-saw mechanism from a different perspective. We attempt to
understand the natural appearance of the eigenstates of charge
conjugation C, Majorana fermions, using an analogue of the Bo-
goliubov
transformation when C is strongly violated by the right-
handed
neutrino mass term which has good CP symmetry. We
then recognize that the tiny neutrino mass in the see-saw mecha-
nism
is given as a difference of two large masses, precise values of
which depend on models. This suggests a view different from the
conventional one, motivating us to ask whether the see-saw mech-
anism
is “natural” in the sense emphasized, for example, in [6,7].
We show that a hitherto unrecognized fine tuning of the order
*
Corresponding author.
E-mail
address: anca.tureanu@helsinki.fi (A. Tureanu).
m
ν
/m
R
is required to make the see-saw mechanism work in a nat-
ural
setting.
We
first recapitulate the basic properties of Majorana fermions,
namely, charge conjugation and parity. The Majorana fermions are
defined by the condition
ψ(x) = C
¯
ψ
T
(x) =ψ
c
(x),
where C = iγ
2
γ
0
stands for the charge conjugation matrix [8];
the quantity C
¯
ψ
T
(x) is directly evaluated for a given ψ(x) while
ψ
c
(x) is evaluated by a unitary charge conjugation operator, and
the agreement of these two expressions provides an important
consistency check in our analysis (for example, of eq. (26) below).
We start with a generic neutral Dirac fermion, which is denoted by
ν(x) for later convenience, and define the combinations
ψ
±
(x) =
1
√
2
[ν(x) ±ν
c
(x)],
which satisfy
ψ
c
±
(x) =±ψ
±
(x),
showing that ψ
+
(x) and ψ
−
(x) are Majorana fields. We treat the
fermion with ψ
c
−
(x) =−ψ
−
(x) also as a Majorana fermion.
It
is well-known [8,9] that, in theories where the fermion num-
ber
is conserved, discrete symmetries such as parity can generally
be defined with an arbitrary phase freedom δ,
ν(x) → e
iδ
γ
0
ν(t, −
x).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.01.069
0370-2693/
© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by
SCOAP
3
.