Within-Patient Variability of
18
F-FDG:
Standardized Uptake Values in Normal Tissues
Nancy Paquet, MD
1
; Adelin Albert, PhD
2
; Jacqueline Foidart, MD, PhD
1
; and Roland Hustinx, MD, PhD
1
1
Division of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Lie`ge, Lie`ge, Belgium; and
2
Department of Biostatistics, University Hospital
of Lie`ge, Lie`ge, Belgium
The aim of this study was to evaluate the test–retest variability
of standardized uptake values (SUVs) in normal tissues and the
impact of various methods for measuring the SUV. Methods:
SUVs were determined in 70 cancer-free patients (40 female
and 30 male) on 2 occasions an average of 271 d apart. Mean
values for body weight and height, blood glucose level, injected
dose, and uptake period did not change between the 2 groups
of studies. Four regions of interest (ROIs) were placed— on the
liver, lung, mediastinum, and trapezius muscle. Mean and max-
imum SUVs normalized for body weight were obtained, and
normalizations were then applied for lean body mass (LBM),
LBM and blood glucose level, body surface area (BSA), and
BSA and blood glucose level. Results: In the lungs and muscle,
metabolic activity within the ROIs was significantly different in
the 2 studies, no matter which method was used for the SUVs.
The differences ranged from 0.02 to 0.1 for SUV normalized for
body weight and SUV normalized for LBM and from 0.001 to
0.002 for SUV normalized for BSA. In the liver, results were
similar for all SUVs, except for maximum SUV corrected for
LBM and maximum SUV corrected for LBM and blood glucose
level. The metabolic activity measured in the mediastinum was
also comparable in the 2 studies, regardless of the type of SUV.
When investigating whether any normalization method for SUVs
reduces variability and improves test–retest concordance, we
found no significant superiority for any. The best intraclass
correlation coefficients were obtained with the SUV normalized
for body weight, in both the liver and the mediastinum, but the
coefficients of variation were similar for all 3 mean SUVs that
were not corrected for glucose level (range, 10.8%–13.4%).
However, normalizing for blood glucose level increased the
variability and decreased the level of concordance between
studies. Conclusion: The SUVs measured in normal liver and
mediastinum in cancer-free patients are stable over time, no
matter which normalization is used. Correcting for blood glu-
cose level increases the variability of the values and should
therefore be avoided. Normalizing for BSA or LBM does not
improve the reproducibility of the measurements.
Key Words: instrumentation; oncology;
18
F-FDG PET; stan-
dardized uptake value; test–retest variability
J Nucl Med 2004; 45:784 –788
The increased glucose metabolism of cancer cells is used
to detect neoplasms with
18
F-FDG PET imaging, for either
initial staging, posttreatment follow-up, or detection of sus-
pected recurrence. In clinical routine, images are analyzed
either qualitatively, using visual comparison of the metab-
olism in lesions versus normal tissue, or semiquantitatively,
using standardized uptake values (SUVs). SUV is defined as
the tissue concentration (MBq/mL) divided by activity in-
jected per body weight (MBq/g). Many authors have dis-
cussed the multiple factors affecting the SUV, such as
weight, plasma glucose level, length of uptake period, par-
tial-volume effects, and recovery coefficient (1–5).
To our knowledge, there has been no published report of
the test–retest within-patient variability of SUV in normal
tissues. The purpose of this work was to evaluate this issue
and to verify whether one correction method for SUV is
more reproducible than the others. Both the qualitative and
the quantitative evaluation of
18
F-FDG PET images could
be affected.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients
The data on 70 patients (40 female and 30 male; mean age ⫾
SD, 50 ⫾ 16 y) who underwent 2
18
F-FDG PET examinations with
normal findings (271 ⫾ 118 d apart) were analyzed retrospec-
tively. The patients were referred for follow-up of lymphoma
(41%), melanoma (39%), lung carcinoma (10%), gastrointestinal
carcinoma (5%), renal carcinoma (3%), or ovarian carcinoma
(2%). None of the patients received anticancer treatment within 3
mo before the studies or experienced tumor recurrence between the
2 studies. All studies were reviewed by 2 experienced nuclear
medicine physicians, fully aware of all clinical data, and the results
were found to be rigorously normal.
Average body weight (70 ⫾ 12 kg) and height (168 ⫾ 10 cm)
were stable between the 2 studies. The change in weight was 0.7 ⫾
4.2 kg between studies. Only 9 of 70 patients had changes exceed-
ing 10% of their initial weight (13% of the population sample).
The blood glucose level was measured in all patients before
injection. The average glucose level was 4.8 ⫾ 0.9 mmol/L (3.2–
9.6 mmol/L) for study A (test) and 4.9 ⫾ 0.9 mmol/L (3.6–8.3
mmol/L) for study B (retest) (P ⫽ 0.29).
Received Sep. 23, 2003; revision accepted Dec. 12, 2003.
For correspondence or reprints contact: Roland Hustinx, MD, PhD, Division
of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Lie` ge, Sart-Tilman B35, 4000
Lie` ge 1, Belgium.
E-mail: rhustinx@chu.ulg.ac.be
784 THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE • Vol. 45 • No. 5 • May 2004