Physics Letters B 750 (2015) 107–111
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Physics Letters B
www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb
Heavy concerns about the light axino explanation of the 3.5 keV
X-ray line
Stefano Colucci
a
, Herbi K. Dreiner
a
, Florian Staub
b
, Lorenzo Ubaldi
c,∗
a
Physikalisches Institut der Universität Bonn, Bethe Center for Theoretical Physics, Nußallee 12, 53115 Bonn, Germany
b
Theory Division, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
c
Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received
27 July 2015
Received
in revised form 13 August 2015
Accepted
2 September 2015
Available
online 7 September 2015
Editor:
A. Ringwald
An unidentified 3.5 keV line from X-ray observations of galaxy clusters has been reported recently. Al-
though
still under scrutiny, decaying dark matter could be responsible for this signal. We investigate
whether an axino with a mass of 7 keV could explain the line, keeping the discussion as model inde-
pendent
as possible. We point out several obstacles, which were overlooked in the literature, and which
make the axino an unlikely candidate. The only viable scenario predicts a light metastable neutralino,
with a mass between 0.1 and 10 GeV and a lifetime between 10
−3
and 10
4
s.
© 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP
3
.
1. Introduction
There has been interest recently in an unidentified 3.5 keV line
in X-ray observations of galaxy clusters [1,2]. Despite its physi-
cal
origin being subject to debate [3–8], there is still some room
to speculate that decaying dark matter is responsible for this sig-
nal.
The first obvious dark matter (DM) candidate in this context
is a 7 keV sterile neutrino [1], but many other alternatives have
been proposed. Some authors have pointed out that a decaying
axino could explain the line [9–12]. In this paper we examine care-
fully
the conditions under which a 7 keV axino would produce
the observed X-ray line. Due to the large number of parameters
at disposal in supersymmetric models, it is hard to exclude with
certainty the axino scenario. However we show that various con-
straints
leave almost no room available in the parameter space of
these models. Therefore we deem the axino an unlikely candidate
to explain the line. The authors of Ref. [13] also mentioned the ax-
ino
as an unnatural explanation of the X-ray line. In this work we
elaborate on the physical arguments that lead to such a conclusion.
There
are a few reasons why it is appealing to consider a model
with a light axino. First, introducing the axion multiplet (axion, ax-
ino,
saxion) in models of supersymmetry (SUSY) solves the strong
CP problem [14]. Second, the axion and the axino can both be
*
Corresponding author.
E-mail
addresses: colucci@th.physik.uni-bonn.de (S. Colucci),
dreiner@th.physik.uni-bonn.de (H.K. Dreiner), florian.staub@cern.ch (F. Staub),
ubaldi.physics@gmail.com (L. Ubaldi).
DM candidates. Third, if the axino has a mass in the keV range,
it is warm DM and it could help reconcile some small-scale struc-
ture
issues [15–17] of cold DM. In the context of R-parity violating
(RPV) SUSY [18], a light axino is unstable. Its lifetime is still longer
than the age of the universe, but it can decay into a neutrino and
a photon. It is this channel that would produce the 3.5 keV line.
RPV models also have the virtue of explaining the null-results for
SUSY searches at the LHC without introducing a little hierarchy
problem: the limits on the masses of the sparticles become much
weaker [19–23]. The axino could also produce an X-ray photon in
R-parity conserving SUSY. This is possible if the lightest neutralino
is very light or even massless. The axino can then decay into the
neutralino plus a photon [12]. We comment also on this possibility,
below.
This
letter is organized as follows. In Section 2, we review how
the axino abundance depends on the reheating temperature, in
Section 3 we discuss various constraints that the 3.5 keV line puts
on models with a decaying axino. We conclude in Section 4.
2. Axino relic density
Any supersymmetric model with an axino contains also an ax-
ion.
The latter, as an invisible axion, is always a good DM candi-
date,
while the former is suitable only if it is sufficiently long lived.
We are here interested in a scenario where the axino constitutes
almost the entire DM budget of the universe. This is typically re-
alized
for low values of the axion decay constant ( f
a
∼10
10
GeV),
in which case the axion DM component is suppressed and can be
neglected. See e.g. Ref. [24] for a review on axion DM.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.09.009
0370-2693/
© 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by
SCOAP
3
.