谷歌分布式文件系统：Google File System详解

需积分: 10 172 浏览量更新于2024-07-25 收藏 269KB PDF 举报

"Google File System (GFS) 是一个由Google设计并实现的可扩展的分布式文件系统，专为大型数据密集型应用而构建。它在廉价的商用硬件上运行，提供高聚合性能，并能服务大量客户端。GFS的设计考虑了实际应用负载和技术环境的变化，与早期的分布式文件系统有所不同，它重新审视了传统选择并探索了全新的设计思路。该文件系统已在Google内部广泛应用，作为存储平台支持服务、研究和开发工作，处理大规模数据集。最大的集群至今已提供数百TB的存储空间，跨越数千台机器的数千个磁盘。" **Google File System的核心特点** 1. **可扩展性**：GFS设计目标是支持大规模的存储需求，能够随着硬件和数据的增长轻松扩展。它通过将文件系统划分为大量的小块（通常为64MB）并在多台机器上分布式存储来实现这一点。 2. **容错性**：为了确保数据安全和系统的稳定性，GFS采用了副本机制。每个数据块通常有三个副本，分别存储在不同的机器上，这样即使部分硬件故障，也能保证数据的可用性。 3. **高性能**：GFS通过优化数据读写操作，特别是对于大文件的处理，提供了高聚合性能。它使用主服务器（Master Node）来集中管理和调度文件系统的元数据，从而加速文件访问。 4. **简单的接口**：GFS提供了简单的API，使得应用程序可以方便地与文件系统交互，支持基本的读、写和追加操作，适合大数据处理任务。 5. **粗粒度锁**：与传统的细粒度文件锁定不同，GFS使用粗粒度锁策略，允许多个客户端并行访问同一文件的不同部分，提高了并发性能。 6. **批量操作**：GFS鼓励进行批量I/O操作，而不是频繁的小规模操作，以减少网络开销和提高效率。 7. **故障恢复**：当检测到硬件故障时，GFS能够自动重新分布数据块的副本，确保服务的连续性。此外，主服务器监控所有节点的健康状态，以及时发现并处理问题。 8. **动态扩展**：GFS能够无缝添加新的硬件节点，以应对数据增长或性能需求的增加，而不会中断服务。 **应用场景** GFS被广泛应用于Google的各种服务，包括搜索引擎索引构建、数据分析、日志处理等。它的设计思想对后来的分布式存储系统如Hadoop的HDFS产生了深远影响。 **与其他分布式文件系统的比较** GFS与传统的分布式文件系统（如NFS、Coda等）相比，更注重处理大规模数据和高并发读写场景。而与后来的HDFS相比，虽然两者都基于相同的分布式文件系统设计理念，但HDFS在GFS的基础上进行了优化，更适合MapReduce这样的批处理计算框架。 **结论** Google File System通过其创新的设计和强大的功能，成功地满足了Google内部的大规模数据处理需求，同时也对分布式存储领域的理论和实践产生了重大影响。它证明了在廉价硬件上实现高可用、高并发和可扩展的文件系统是完全可能的，为后续的云计算和大数据技术奠定了基础。

Legend:

Data messages

Control messages

Application

(file name, chunk index)

(chunk handle,

chunk locations)

GFS master

File namespace

/foo/bar

Instructions to chunkserver

Chunkserver state

GFS chunkserverGFS chunkserver

(chunk handle, byte range)

chunk data

chunk 2ef0

Linux file system Linux file system

GFS client

Figure 1: GFS Architecture

and replication decisions using global knowledge. However,

we must minimize its involvement in reads and writes so

that it does not become a bottleneck. Clients never read

and write ﬁle data through the master. Instead, a client asks

the master which chunkservers it should contact. It caches

this information for a limited time and interacts with the

chunkservers directly for many subsequent operations.

Let us explain the interactions for a simple read with refer-

ence to Figure 1. First, using the ﬁxed chunk size, the client

translates the ﬁle name and byte oﬀset speciﬁed by the ap-

plication into a chunk index within the ﬁle. Then, it sends

the master a request containing the ﬁle name and chunk

index. The master replies with the corresponding chunk

handle and locations of the replicas. The client caches this

information using the ﬁle name and chunk index as the key.

The client then sends a request to one of the replicas,

most likely the closest one. The request speciﬁes the chunk

handle and a byte range within that chunk. Further reads

of the same chunk require no more client-master interaction

until the cached information expires or the ﬁle is reopened.

In fact, the client typically asks for multiple chunks in the

same request and the master can also include the informa-

tion for chunks immediately following those requested. This

extra information sidesteps several future client-master in-

teractions at practically no extra cost.

2.5 Chunk Size

Chunk size is one of the key design parameters. We have

chosen 64 MB, which is much larger than typical ﬁle sys-

tem block sizes. Each chunk replica is stored as a plain

Linux ﬁle on a chunkserver and is extended only as needed.

Lazy space allocation avoids wasting space due to internal

fragmentation, perhaps the greatest objection against such

a large chunk size.

A large chunk size oﬀers several important advantages.

First, it reduces clients’ need to interact with the master

because reads and writes on the same chunk require only

one initial request to the master for chunk location informa-

tion. The reduction is especially signiﬁcant for our work-

loads because applications mostly read and write large ﬁles

sequentially. Even for small random reads, the client can

comfortably cache all the chunk location information for a

multi-TB working set. Second, since on a large chunk, a

client is more likely to perform many operations on a given

chunk, it can reduce network overhead by keeping a persis-

tent TCP connection to the chunkserver over an extended

period of time. Third, it reduces the size of the metadata

stored on the master. This allows us to keep the metadata

in memory, which in turn brings other advantages that we

will discuss in Section 2.6.1.

On the other hand, a large chunk size, even with lazy space

allocation, has its disadvantages. A small ﬁle consists of a

small number of chunks, perhaps just one. The chunkservers

storing those chunks may become hot spots if many clients

are accessing the same ﬁle. In practice, hot spots have not

been a major issue because our applications mostly read

large multi-chunk ﬁles sequentially.

However, hot spots did develop when GFS was ﬁrst used

by a batch-queue system: an executable was written to GFS

as a single-chunk ﬁle and then started on hundreds of ma-

chines at the same time. The few chunkservers storing this

executable were overloaded by hundreds of simultaneous re-

quests. We ﬁxed this problem by storing such executables

with a higher replication factor and by making the batch-

queue system stagger application start times. A potential

long-term solution is to allow clients to read data from other

clients in such situations.

2.6 Metadata

The master stores three major types of metadata: the ﬁle

and chunk namespaces, the mapping from ﬁles to chunks,

and the locations of each chunk’s replicas. All metadata is

kept in the master’s memory. The ﬁrst two types (names-

paces and ﬁle-to-chunk mapping) are also kept persistent by

logging mutations to an operation log stored on the mas-

ter’s local disk and replicated on remote machines. Using

a log allows us to update the master state simply, reliably,

and without risking inconsistencies in the event of a master

crash. The master does not store chunk location informa-

tion persistently. Instead, it asks each chunkserver about its

chunks at master startup and whenever a chunkserver joins

the cluster.

2.6.1 In-Memory Data Structures

Since metadata is stored in memory, master operations are

fast. Furthermore, it is easy and eﬃcient for the master to

periodically scan through its entire state in the background.

This periodic scanning is used to implement chunk garbage

collection, re-replication in the presence of chunkserver fail-

ures, and chunk migration to balance load and disk space

剩余14页未读，继续阅读

猴子数据分析

粉丝: 2288
资源: 8

谷歌分布式文件系统：Google File System详解

The Google File System中文版

Google File System Paper

The Google File System中文翻译

Google File System（GFS）

google file system

请简要介绍Google file system的存储构架

The Google File System要解决的问题是否重要

Hadoop Distributed File System

Apache Hadoop 是什么平台

1、什么是Hadoop，Hadoop的核心组件有些？

最新资源