Technical Foundation and Calibration Methods for Time-of-Flight Cameras 11
the ToF camera is viewing the floor and wall a hole is reconstructed in the floor,
where the position of the hole aligns with the light path from camera to wall,
wall to floor, and then back to the camera. The distance into the hole is due
to the phase of the total measured phasor and is determined by the relative
amplitude and phase of the component returns, as per Eq. 9. Another example
that exhibits strong multipath interference is the sharp inside corner junction
between two walls [12]. The light bouncing from one wall to the other causes the
camera to measure an erroneous curved corner.
Multipath interference can also occur intra-camera due to the light refraction
and reflection of an imaging lens and aperture [13,14,15]. The aperture effect
is due to diffraction which leads to localised blurring in the image formation
process. Fine detail beyond the limits in angular resolution is greatly reduced,
causing sharp edges to blur. Aberrations in the lens increase the loss in resolu-
tion. Reflections at the optical boundaries of the glass produce what is commonly
referred to as lens flare [16], which causes non-local spreading of light across the
scene. In ToF imaging the lens-flare effect is most prominent when a bright fore-
ground scatterer is present. The foreground object does not need to be directly
visible to the camera, as long as the light from the source is able to reach that
object and reflect, at least in part, back to the lens [17]. Such light scattering
leads to distorted reconstructed ranges throughout the scene with the greatest
errors occurring for darker objects.
2.6 Other Error Sources
ToF camera sensors suffer from the same errors as standard camera sensors. The
most important error source in the sensor is a result of the photon counting
process in the sensor. Since photons are detected only by a certain probability,
Poisson noise is introduced. We refer to Seitz [18] and the thesis by Schmidt [10,
Sect. 3.1] for detailed studies on the Poisson noise. An experimental evaluation
of noise characteristics of different ToF cameras has been performed in by Erz
&J¨ahne [19]. Besides from that other kinds of noise, e.g. dark (fixed-pattern)
noise and read-out noise, occur.
In ToF cameras, however, noise has a strong influence on the estimated scene
depth, due to the following two issues
– The recorded light intensity in the raw channels is stemming from both active
and background illumination. Isolating the active part of the signal reduces
the SNR. Such a reduction could be compensated by increasing the integra-
tion time, which on the other hand increases the risk of an over-saturation of
the sensor cells, leading to false depth estimation. As a consequence, a trade-
off in the integration time has to be made, often leading to a low SNR in the
raw data, which occurs especially in areas with extremely low reflectivity or
objects far away from the sensor.
– Since the estimated scene depth depends non-linearly on the raw channels
(cf. Eqs. 4 and 7), the noise is amplified in this process. This amplification is
typically modeled ([1,20]) by assuming Gaussian noise in the raw data and