智力测试对比：SIT与WISC-R在天才学生中的应用分析

需积分: 5 115 浏览量更新于2024-08-07 收藏 299KB PDF 举报

"天才学生的 SIT 与 WISC-R 的比较" 这篇学术论文"Comparison of the SIT with the WISC-R for Gifted Students"由Frances A. Karnes和K. Eliot Brown撰写，他们来自美国南密西西比大学。论文主要探讨了在识别和重新评估天才学生是否符合特殊教育项目资格时，快速筛选工具的重要性。Slosson Intelligence Test（SIT）被提议作为这样的工具，它是一种简化的智力测试。在对SIT进行的十年效度研究回顾中，Stewart和Jones（1976）发现SIT与Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Revised (WISC-R)之间存在显著的相关性。他们建议未来的研究应关注具有特定智商范围的子群体以进一步验证SIT的有效性。然而，这项最新研究对比了SIT与WISC-R在一组智力超常学生中的表现，结果显示出两者之间的相关性降低。计算出的回归方程与Stewart和Jones在非受限智商人群中报告的方程不同，尽管SIT在预测能力上有所提高。近年来，针对智力超常学生的本地学校项目的数量急剧增加，这导致了对更准确评估工具的需求。由于SIT与WISC-R在天才学生群体中的相关性减弱，该研究支持了对SIT和其他措施在特定子群体中进行比较的必要性。这可能意味着对于这个特定的高智商群体，需要更加精细化和针对性的智力评估工具来更准确地评估他们的能力和潜力，以便更好地设计和实施适合他们的教育计划。这篇论文的贡献在于提醒教育者和心理学家，在评估天才学生时，不能简单地依赖于通用的智力测试，而是需要考虑这些学生的独特性，并可能需要开发或选择更适合他们能力水平的评估方法。同时，它也为未来在这个领域的研究提供了方向，即如何优化筛查工具，以满足特殊教育项目中对天才学生的有效识别和教育需求。

COMPARISON OF THE SIT

WITH THE WISC-R FOR GIFTED STUDENTS

FRANCES A. KARNES

AND

K. ELIOT BROWN

University

Southern Mksissippi

There has been a need to identify a quick screening and reevaluation instrument to

determine eligibility status for specialized programs. The Slosson Intelligence Test

(SIT)

is one instrument that has been suggested for this purpose.

a ten-year review

of validity studies with the

SIT,

Stewart and Jones

(1976)

found substantial cor-

relations between the

SIT

and

WISC.

They recommended that future validity

studies with the

SIT

focus on specific subgroups with restricted

ranges. The pres-

ent study compared the

SIT

with the

WISC-R

for a group

intellectually gifted

students. The results indicated reduced correlations between the measures. The

calculated regression equation was dissimilar to the one reported by Stewart and

Jones for nonrestricted

populations, although predictive ability was greater. The

need for comparing the

SIT

with other measures for specific subgroups was sup-

’

ported.

Recent years have seen a tremendous increase

the number of local school

programs for the intellectually gifted. This growth of interest and service has led many

states to establish minimum guidelines for determining eligibility status for a gifted

program. One of the more common guidelines is an IQ of

130,

while in some states an IQ

120

on an individually administered intelligence test (Wechsler Scales or Stanford-

Binet) is the minimum requirement. This requirement for individual testing, coupled with

recent federal regulations that have mandated services for children with special education

needs, has placed a tremendous burden on local school districts

terms of identifying

these children through accurate referrals and efficient use of school testing personnel.

These developments have led to the need for identifying a quick screening device that

would aid in the initial referral process

as to maximally utilize individual testing time

while minimizing errors

identification. The Slosson Intelligence Test (SIT) (1963) is

frequently mentioned as a possible instrument to accomplish these needs. The

SIT

relatively short test that requires approximately

minutes to administer. In addi-

tion, it is easy to score and requires limited training to administer. The test is partially

based on the Stanford-Binet

(S-B)

and the Gesell Developmental Schedules (GDS). The

SIT has been used previously to identify children

need

a more extensive evaluation.

Typically, the Wechsler Scales or the Stanford-Binet are used for a comprehensive

assessment. Stewart and Jones (1976) caution that the SIT fails to yield diagnostic infor-

mation and should not be used as the sole IQ criterion

placement decisions. In light of

the recent federal regulations that govern special education placement, it seems hardly

likely that a professional examiner would use the SIT for such purposes.

a ten-year review of studies that examined the validity of the SIT with the S-B

and the WISC and WISC-R, Stewart and Jones (1976) found substantial correlations

between the SIT and other IQ measures. They noted that the SIT correlated more highly

with the verbal section of the Wechsler test than with the performance section. In terms

of using the SIT as an initial screening device

reevaluation instrument, Stewart and

Jones suggested that regression equations be calculated and the standard error of es-

timate be used to generate

SIT

IQ ranges “indeterminate with respect to the decision be-

Requests for reprints should

sent

Frances

Karnes, Dept. of Special Education, University

Southern Mississippi, Southern Station,

Box

15.

Hattiesburg,

39401.

478

下载后可阅读完整内容，剩余4页未读，立即下载

weixin_38742954

粉丝: 10
资源: 916

智力测试对比：SIT与WISC-R在天才学生中的应用分析

特殊教育考生的 SIT 和 WISC-R IQ 比较

受教育弱智学生WISC与WISC-R的比较

SIT与WISC-R在天才学生中的对比评估：有效性与局限

城市受教育弱智学生WISC与WISC-R结果比较

Comparison of SIT and WISC-R IQs among special education candidates

面向天才学生的 WISC-R 的简短形式

智力天才学生在 WISC-R 和第四版斯坦福-比奈的分数比较

WISC-R与WISC-III：天才儿童智力评估的比较研究

智力测验比较：WISC-R与WISC-III在天才儿童中的关联性研究

天才学生 WISC-R 分数的性别差异

最新资源