linear reduction

线性降维是一种降低数据维度的方法，它通过线性变换将高维数据投影到一个较低维度的子空间中。线性降维方法主要包括主成分分析(PCA)和多维缩放(MDS)。PCA通过寻找数据中的主要方差分布来确定一个新的坐标系，将原始数据映射到新的低维空间中。MDS则通过计算样本之间的距离矩阵来确定样本在低维空间中的位置。这些方法可以有效地减少数据的维度，提取出主要的特征，并保留数据之间的关系。<span class="em">1</span><span class="em">2</span><span class="em">3</span>
#### 引用[.reference_title]
- *1* *2* *3* [机器学习之降维](https://blog.csdn.net/qq_16829085/article/details/105916024)[target="_blank" data-report-click={"spm":"1018.2226.3001.9630","extra":{"utm_source":"vip_chatgpt_common_search_pc_result","utm_medium":"distribute.pc_search_result.none-task-cask-2~all~insert_cask~default-1-null.142^v93^chatsearchT3_2"}}] [.reference_item style="max-width: 100%"]
[ .reference_list ]

相关问题

Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\PyCharm\5hour(1.1)07linear_regtression\linear.py", line 95, in <module> loss=criterion(y_predicted,y_train) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "D:\Python3.11.2\Lib\site-packages\torch\nn\modules\loss.py", line 616, in __init__ super().__init__(weight, size_average, reduce, reduction) File "D:\Python3.11.2\Lib\site-packages\torch\nn\modules\loss.py", line 30, in __init__ super().__init__(size_average, reduce, reduction) File "D:\Python3.11.2\Lib\site-packages\torch\nn\modules\loss.py", line 23, in __init__ self.reduction: str = _Reduction.legacy_get_string(size_average, reduce) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "D:\Python3.11.2\Lib\site-packages\torch\nn\_reduction.py", line 35, in legacy_get_string if size_average and reduce: RuntimeError: Boolean value of Tensor with more than one value is ambiguous并且传入criterion 函数的两个参数的形状是相同的，请找出错误原因，并给出更改代码

这个错误通常是由于使用了过时的参数组合引起的。在 PyTorch 1.5.0 版本之前，损失函数的参数 `size_average` 和 `reduce` 分别用于控制是否对每个样本的损失进行平均以及是否对每个样本的损失进行求和。但是在 PyTorch 1.5.0 及之后的版本中，这两个参数已经被 `reduction` 参数所取代，`reduction` 参数可以取值为 `'none'`, `'mean'` 或 `'sum'`，分别表示不进行缩减、对所有样本的损失取平均、对所有样本的损失进行求和。

根据你的错误信息，很可能是在使用损失函数时，同时设置了 `size_average=True` 和 `reduce=True` 参数，这导致了错误的出现。建议将损失函数的参数 `size_average=True` 和 `reduce=True` 改为 `reduction='mean'`，代码如下：

criterion = nn.MSELoss(reduction='mean')
loss = criterion(y_predicted, y_train)

这样就可以避免上述错误的出现。

def __init__(self, input_dim): super(NeuralNet, self).__init__() # Define your neural network here # TODO: How to modify this model to achieve better performance? self.net = nn.Sequential( nn.Linear(input_dim, 64), #70是我调得最好的， 而且加层很容易过拟和 nn.ReLU(), nn.Linear(64, 1) ) # Mean squared error loss self.criterion = nn.MSELoss(reduction='mean')

To modify the `NeuralNet` model to achieve better performance, you can consider experimenting with the following modifications:

1. Increase the number of hidden layers: Adding more hidden layers can increase the model's capacity to learn complex patterns in the data. You can add additional `nn.Linear` layers with appropriate activation functions between them.

2. Adjust the number of hidden units in each layer: The number of hidden units determines the complexity and representational power of the neural network. Increasing the number of hidden units can potentially improve the model's ability to capture intricate relationships in the data. You can modify the `in_features` argument of `nn.Linear` to change the number of hidden units in a particular layer.

3. Try different activation functions: The ReLU activation function (`nn.ReLU`) is commonly used in neural networks, but experimenting with other activation functions such as `nn.LeakyReLU` or `nn.ELU` might yield better results for your specific task.

4. Implement regularization techniques: Regularization techniques like dropout or weight decay can help prevent overfitting and improve generalization. You can add dropout layers (`nn.Dropout`) after each hidden layer or apply weight decay using optimizer-specific parameters.

5. Adjust the learning rate and optimizer: The learning rate and choice of optimizer can significantly impact the model's convergence and performance. You can experiment with different learning rates and optimizers (e.g., Adam, RMSprop, SGD) to find the combination that works best for your specific task.

Remember to assess the impact of these modifications on both training and validation/test performance to ensure you're achieving better results without overfitting or sacrificing generalization. It may require some trial and error to find the optimal configuration for your specific problem.