Apache Helix：解构集群管理复杂性
需积分: 7 171 浏览量
更新于2024-07-18
收藏 545KB PDF 举报
"Apache Helix 是一个基于Zookeeper构建的分布式集群管理框架，由LinkedIn开发，用于解决大规模系统中的复杂动态管理和故障恢复问题。它在各种分布式数据系统中发挥着关键作用，如在线服务、离线分析、数据传输和搜索等应用场景。尽管这些系统可能服务于不同的目的，但它们往往具有许多共同的特性，并且在架构上倾向于使用相同的构建模块。集群管理作为其中一个核心组件，开始受到更多的关注，因为它处理的是包含大量服务器的动态系统的复杂性，包括处理软件和硬件故障、任务设置（如数据初始化）以及数据放置等操作问题。"
Apache Helix的核心功能和设计原理：
1. **动态集群管理**：Helix提供了对集群状态的实时监控和自动调整能力，支持添加、删除和重启节点，确保服务的高可用性和负载均衡。
2. **故障检测与恢复**：通过集成Zookeeper，Helix可以快速检测到集群中的节点故障，并自动将故障节点上的工作负载转移到其他健康的节点，保证服务的连续性。
3. **资源分配与平衡**：Helix可以根据预设的策略和当前集群状态，智能地分配和重新分配资源，确保数据和服务的均匀分布。
4. **多租户支持**：Helix能够支持多个独立的应用或服务在同一集群中运行，通过隔离和调度策略，确保各应用之间的资源互不影响。
5. **模块化设计**：Helix的设计允许开发者根据需要扩展和定制管理模块，适应不同场景下的需求。
6. **可编程控制**：提供API接口，允许用户自定义规则和策略，例如故障处理策略、资源分配算法等，实现灵活的集群管理。
7. **状态模型**：Helix使用状态模型来表示资源和实例的状态，如Online、Offline、DROPPED等，便于理解和处理各种情况。
8. **事务处理**：Helix支持事务处理，保证在分布式环境中的数据一致性。
9. **监控与调试**：提供丰富的监控指标和日志，方便排查问题和优化性能。
在LinkedIn和其他组织的实践中，Apache Helix已经成为构建大规模分布式系统的关键工具，它简化了复杂集群的运维工作，提高了系统的稳定性和效率。通过利用Helix，开发者可以更专注于业务逻辑，而不必过于担忧底层集群的管理问题。
Databus Databus is a change data capture (CDC) system that provides a common pipeline for transporting events from
LinkedIn primary databases to caches within various applications.
Databus deploys a cluster of relays that pull the change log from multiple databases and let consumers subscribe to the
change log stream. Each Databus relay connects to one or more database servers and hosts a certain subset of databases (and
partitions) from those database servers. Databus has the same concerns as Espresso and Search-as-a-service for assigning
databases and partitions to relays.
Databus consumers have a cluster management problem as well. For a large partitioned database (e.g. Espresso), the
change log is consumed by a bank of consumers. Each databus partition is assigned to a consumer such that partitions are
evenly distributed across consumers and each partition is assigned to exactly one consumer at a time. The set of consumers
may grow over time, and consumers may leave the group due to planned or unplanned outages. In these cases, partitions
must be reassigned, while maintaining balance and the single consumer-per-partition invariant.
2.2 Requirements
The above systems tackle very different use cases. As we discuss how they partition their workloads and balance them
across servers, however, it is easy to see they have a number of common requirements, which we explicitly list here.
• Assignment of logical resources to physical servers Our use cases all involve taking a system’s set of logical resources
and mapping them to physical servers. The logical entities can be database partitions as in Espresso, or a consumer as in
the Databus consumption case. Note a logical entity may or may not have state associated with it, and a cluster manager
must be aware of any cost associated with this state (e.g. movement cost).
• Fault detection and resource reassignment All of our use case systems must handle cluster member failures by
first detecting such failures, and second re-replicating and reassigning resources across the surviving members, all while
satisfying the system’s invariants and load balancing goals. For example, Espresso mandates a single master per partition,
while Databus consumption mandates a consumer must exist for every database partition. When a server fails, the masters
or consumers on that server must be reassigned.
• Elasticity Similar to failure detection and response requirement, systems must be able to incorporate new cluster physical
entities by redistributing logical resources to those entities. For example, Espresso moves partitions to new storage nodes,
and Databus moves database partitions to new consumers.
• Monitoring Our use cases require we monitor systems to detect load imbalance, either because of skewed load against a
system’s logical partitions (e.g., an Espresso hot spot), or because a physical server become degraded and cannot handle
its expected load (e.g., via disk failure). We must detect these conditions, e.g., by monitoring throughput or latency, and
then invoke cluster transitions to respond.
Reflecting back on these requirements we observe a few key trends. They all involve encoding a system’s optimal and
minimally acceptable state, and having the ability to respond to changes in the system to maintain the desired state. In the
subsequent sections we show how we incorporate these requirements into Helix.
3. DESIGN
This section discusses the key aspects of Helix’s design by which it meets the requirements introduced in Section 2.2. Our
framework layers system-specific behavior on top of generic cluster management. Helix handles the common management
tasks while allowing systems to easily define and plug in system-specific logic.
In order to discuss distributed data systems in a general way we introduce some basic terminology:
3.1 DDS Terminology
• Node: A single machine.
• Cluster: A collection of nodes, usually within a single data center, that operate collectively and constitute the DDS.
• Resource: A logical entity defined by and whose purpose is specific to the DDS. Examples are a database, search index,
or topic/queue in a pub-sub system.
• Partition: Resources are often too large or must support too high a request rate to maintain them in their entirety, but
instead are broken into pieces. A partition is a subset of the resource. The manner in which the resource is broken is
system-specific; one common approach for a database is to horizontally partition it and assign records to partitions by
hashing on their keys.
剩余18页未读，继续阅读
2011-07-18 上传
2008-09-25 上传
2023-07-08 上传
2023-06-06 上传
2023-10-23 上传
2024-09-07 上传
浴火重生-xhyzjiji
- 粉丝: 24
- 资源: 2
我的内容管理
展开
最新资源
- AirKiss技术详解：无线传递信息与智能家居连接
- Hibernate主键生成策略详解
- 操作系统实验：位示图法管理磁盘空闲空间
- JSON详解：数据交换的主流格式
- Win7安装Ubuntu双系统详细指南
- FPGA内部结构与工作原理探索
- 信用评分模型解析：WOE、IV与ROC
- 使用LVS+Keepalived构建高可用负载均衡集群
- 微信小程序驱动餐饮与服装业创新转型：便捷管理与低成本优势
- 机器学习入门指南：从基础到进阶
- 解决Win7 IIS配置错误500.22与0x80070032
- SQL-DFS：优化HDFS小文件存储的解决方案
- Hadoop、Hbase、Spark环境部署与主机配置详解
- Kisso：加密会话Cookie实现的单点登录SSO
- OpenCV读取与拼接多幅图像教程
- QT实战：轻松生成与解析JSON数据
