实践指南：网站优化的Bandit算法

需积分: 4 122 浏览量更新于2024-07-17 收藏 7.24MB PDF 举报

"《Bandit Algorithms For Website Optimization》是一本由John Myles White编写的书，专注于介绍在实践中实验和学习算法的短期教程。本书针对的是希望通过编程实践理解新算法的读者，特别是对网站优化感兴趣的读者。书中使用Python语言解释并示例了每一种算法，并在配套在线材料中提供了用Julia（一种适合实现bandit算法的新编程语言）实现的相同算法代码，还有JavaScript等其他语言的实现链接。" 在网站优化中，Bandit算法是一种关键的工具，它主要用于A/B测试和决策制定，帮助网站所有者通过不断试错来优化用户体验和转化率。Bandit算法的核心思想是平衡探索与利用：在尝试新的优化策略（探索）的同时，也要最大化当前最佳策略的收益（利用）。这种算法在网页设计、广告投放、推荐系统等领域都有广泛应用。书中提到的Python和Julia代码示例，为读者提供了一手的实践经验，帮助读者深入理解Bandit算法的工作原理和实际效果。Python是一种广泛使用的编程语言，适合初学者和专业开发者，而Julia则以其高性能和数学计算能力受到数据科学界的青睐，对于实现复杂算法特别有效。 Bandit算法主要包括以下几种类型： 1. **Epsilon-Greedy算法**：这是最简单的Bandit算法之一，大部分时间选择当前最佳策略，但有一定概率随机尝试其他策略以进行探索。 2. **Softmax算法**：也称为温度调整算法，根据每个策略的历史回报率，以概率分布的方式选择策略，探索与利用之间的平衡可通过调整“温度”参数控制。 3. **Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) 算法**：考虑了每个策略的不确定性，选择具有最高上界回报期望的策略，从而在探索未知策略和利用已知高回报策略之间取得平衡。 4. **Thompson Sampling**：基于贝叶斯统计的方法，每次选择具有最高后验概率的策略，既能探索又能利用。书中的内容可能还包括这些算法的实现细节、性能比较、模拟实验以及如何将它们应用到实际的网站优化问题中。此外，作者还可能讨论了如何处理稀疏反馈、动态环境以及如何评估和调整算法性能等相关话题。这本书对于想要了解和实施Bandit算法以提升网站性能的Web开发者、数据科学家和产品经理来说，是一份宝贵的资源。它不仅提供了理论知识，更强调了实践操作，鼓励读者通过编写和运行代码来加深理解。通过阅读此书，读者可以学习如何运用Bandit算法进行有效的网站优化，提高用户体验，最终提升业务指标。

“Cynthia’s a scientist. Of course she thinks that you should run lots of experiments. She

wants to have knowledge for knowledge’s sake and never thinks about the costs of her

experiments. But you’re a businesswoman, Deb. You have a livelihood to make. You

should try to maximize your site’s profits. To keep your checkbook safe, you should only

run experiments that could be profitable. Knowledge is only valuable for profit’s sake in

business. Unless you really believe a change has the potential to be valuable, don’t try it

at all. And if you don’t have any new ideas that you have faith in, going with your

traditional logo is the best strategy.”

Bob’s skepticism of the value of large-scale experimentation rekindled Deb’s concerns

earlier: the threat of losing customers was greater than Deb had felt when energized by

Cynthia’s passion for designing experiments. But Deb also wasn’t clear how to decide

which changes would be profitable without trying them out, which seemed to lead her

back to Cynthia’s original proposal and away from Bob’s preference for tradition.

After spending some time weighing Cynthia and Bob’s arguments, Deb decided that

there was always going to be a fundamental trade-off between the goals that motivated

Cynthia and Bob: a small business couldn’t afford to behave like a scientist and spend

money gaining knowledge for knowledge’s sake, but it also couldn’t afford to focus short-

sightedly on current profits and to never try out any new ideas. As far as she could see,

Deb felt that there was never going to be a simple way to balance the need to (1) learn

new things and (2) profit from old things that she’d already learned.

Oscar the Operations Researcher

Luckily, Deb had one more friend she knew she could turn to for advice: Oscar, a pro‐

fessor who worked in the local Department of Operations Research. Deb knew that

Oscar was an established expert in business decision-making, so she suspected the Oscar

would have something intelligent to say about her newfound questions about balancing

experimentation with profit-maximization.

And Oscar was indeed interested in Deb’s idea:

“I entirely agree that you have to find a way to balance Cynthia’s interest in experimen‐

tation and Bob’s interest in profits. My colleagues and I call that the Explore-Exploit

trade-off.”

“Which is?”

“It’s the way Operations Researchers talk about your need to balance experimentation

with profit-maximization. We call experimentation exploration and we call profit-

maximization exploitation. They’re the fundamental values that any profit-seeking sys‐

tem, whether it’s a person, a company or a robot, has to find a way to balance. If you do

too much exploration, you lose money. And if you do too much exploitation, you stag‐

nate and miss out on new opportunities.”

The Scientist and the Businessman | 3

“So how do I balance exploration and exploitation?”

“Unfortunately, I don’t have a simple answer for you. Like you suspected, there is no

universal solution to balancing your two goals: to learn which ideas are good or bad,

you have to explore — at the risk of losing money and bringing in fewer profits. The

right way to choose between exploring new ideas and exploiting the best of your old

ideas depends on the details of your situation. What I can tell you is that your plan to

run A/B testing, which both Cynthia and Bob seem to be taking for granted as the only

possible way you could learn which color logo is best, is not always the best option.”

“For example, a trial period of A/B testing followed by sticking strictly to the best design

afterwards only makes sense if there is a definite best design that consistently works

across the Christmas season and the rest of the year. But imagine that the best color

scheme is black/orange near Halloween and red/green near Christmas. If you run an A/

B experiment during only one of those two periods of time, you’ll come to think there’s

a huge difference — and then your profits will suddenly come crashing down during

the other time of year.”

“And there are other potential problems as well with naive A/B testing: if you run an

experiment that streches across both times of year, you’ll see no average effect for your

two color schemes — even though there’s a huge effect in each of the seasons if you had

examined them separately. You need context to design meaningful experiments. And

you need to experiment intelligently. Thankfully, there are lots of algorithms you can

use to help you design better experiments.”

The Explore-Exploit Dilemma

Hopefully the short story I’ve just told you has made it clear to you that you have two

completely different goals you need to address when you try to optimize a website: you

need to (A) learn about new ideas (which we’ll always call exploring from now on), while

you also need to (B) take advantage of the best of your old ideas (which we’ll always call

exploiting from now on). Cynthia the scientist was meant to embody exploration: she

was open to every new idea, including the terrible ideas of using a purple or chartreuse

logo. Bob was meant to embody exploitation, because he closes his mind to new ideas

prematurely and is overly willing to stick with tradition.

To help you build better websites, we’ll do exactly what Oscar would have done to help

Deborah: we’ll give you a crash course in methods for solving the Explore-Exploit di‐

lemma. We’ll discuss two classic algorithms, one state-of-the-art algorithm and then

refer you to standard textbooks with much more information about the huge field that’s

arisen around the Exploration-Exploitation trade-off.

4 | Chapter 1: Two Characters: Exploration and Exploitation

剩余86页未读，继续阅读

dianyanjiao2372

粉丝: 0
资源: 1

实践指南：网站优化的Bandit算法

Bandit Algorithms.pdf

Optimization Algorithms on Matrix Manifolds

BanditAlgorithmsForWebsiteOptimizationEbook.pdf 英文原版

Bandit Algorithms for Website Optimization

【Bandit Algorithms学习笔记】EXP3算法理论证明1

bandit-website

Bandit+Algorithms-book.pdf

Multi-armed-Bandit-Algorithms:Golang中的多臂Bandit算法

bandit-algorithms-js：js中的epsilon-greedy和softmax算法的实现

Distributed exploration bandit for dynamic spectrum access

最新资源